Latest News

Two things OPEC+ cannot control. Russell: Trump and China imports

Two factors are largely outside the control of OPEC+, and are likely to influence the price of crude in the next few weeks.

First, we need to know if U.S. President Donald Trump decides to launch a shooting conflict with Iran. If he does, will both sides be able keep oil cargoes flowing and production infrastructure intact?

Second, China, as the world's largest crude importer, will decide whether to reduce its recent strong imports, in light of January's 16% increase in Brent benchmark futures.

It was only logical that the eight members with production quotas of OPEC+, given the uncertainty on the crude oil market today, would not make any changes to their policy of production at the meeting they held on Sunday.

Eight OPEC+ member countries, who pump around half of the world's crude oil, increased production quotas from April to December 2025 by approximately 2.9 million barrels a day, or roughly 3% global demand. Then, they froze planned increases from January to March 2026 due to seasonal lower consumption.

The exporter group is gaining ground in some respects.

Prices are rising, but not to the point that they will cause concern about inflation or a slowdown in economic growth for importing countries.

Brent crude oil ended the day at $70.69 per barrel, just shy of the six-month high reached the day before.

Media and analyst commentary has also been dominated by the narrative of an oversupply of oil, as the focus is now on the reshaping the Venezuelan oil flow after the intervention of the United States. The intervention that led the President Nicolas Maduro to be taken away, as well the current tensions between Iran and the United States.

OPEC+'s biggest challenge is the Iranian situation, since it would be against their interest to see a military conflict continue in the?Middle East even though they are enjoying the $7-$8 premium on the current oil prices.

Trump will likely make his own calculations about whether he is able to?attack Iran, achieve the goals he wants, and keep oil prices low to avoid inflation and public outrage at home.

The risk premium on crude oil will likely remain for the time being until the United States has decided what they are going to do and the possible consequences.

CHINA IMPORTS

China could reduce its crude imports as a result of the price increase in January.

China's arrivals in December reached a record 13,18 million barrels per daily (bpd). They are expected to remain robust in January. According to commodity analysts Kpler, seaborne arrivals were 10.4 million, which would need to be increased by about 1 million bpd for pipeline imports, bringing the total to around 11.4 millions bpd.

Brent oil fell to a low of $58,72 per barrel on December 16, a drop of seven months.

China is likely to reduce imports in order to meet its consumption and will not add crude oil to its strategic reserves.

China does not disclose the flows in or out of its commercial and strategic stocks, but it imports far more crude oil than it processes.

Add imports and domestic production and subtract refinery processing to calculate China's excess crude.

This means that China was able to absorb a large part of the anticipated supply surplus by taking advantage of the low oil price.

In the past, sharp rises in crude oil prices led to lower imports from China. If this trend continues, it is likely that less tankers will arrive in Chinese ports by the end of March and into April.

If China reduces imports by 1 million bpd or more, this would lead to a return of the supply glut talk points. This is especially true if the outcome between the United States, Iran, and other countries does not affect crude shipments, infrastructure, and so on.

You like this column? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. ROI provides data-driven, thought-provoking analysis on everything from soybeans to swap rates. The markets are changing faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, X.

These are the views of the columnist, an author for.

(source: Reuters)