Latest News

Helen Jewell explains why gold and defense stocks fell as the war broke out.

Helen Jewell explains why gold and defense stocks fell as the war broke out.
Helen Jewell explains why gold and defense stocks fell as the war broke out.

Investors tend to raise money first, and then ask questions. Investors who are aware of this phenomenon will not have a problem. It's a great opportunity.

Gold dropped by nearly 4% in the four days following the first U.S./Israeli strike on Iran. So did European defence stocks. It seems strange. Gold has been historically a safe investment in turbulent times. Conflicts are usually the driving force behind military equipment demand.

This is due to investor positioning, or more specifically, crowded trading.

Many fund managers will execute a “program trade” to de-risk quickly and mechanically in order to raise money when a market-jolting, large event occurs.

Instead of selling only certain positions, they try to raise cash by reducing a percentage fixed across all their holdings. The positions that have increased the most are sold most. This is why, when magnified across the market, assets that should benefit from an event can fall the fastest.

CROWDING OUT

In the last few weeks, gold has been the most obvious example.

BlackRock data shows that in 2025, a record amount of money will flow into commodity ETPs. BlackRock data shows that $83 billion of the $100 billion in new money went to gold products. In January, $15.5 billion was added to gold ETPs - the largest monthly inflow in recent memory.

Bank of America data shows that gold was trading 30% above its 200 day moving average before the Middle East conflict. This is the highest of any major asset.

Shortly, gold was a very busy trade. It was because of this that its value dropped when war broke out, despite the fact that it had a reputation for being safe.

The same is true for European defense companies.

The index of the industry has risen more than three-times as much as the European market in the last 12 months. Some companies have soared since the beginning of the Ukraine War. Rheinmetall in Germany, for instance, has risen by 1,700%. In January, flows into an iShares European Defence ETF reached a record high.

This sector, which was a 'clear beneficiary of rising geopolitical conflict', weakened immediately after the war began. It was obvious that this was due to crowded positioning and not fundamentals.

What's next?

In a crisis, de-risking can be the easiest part. What to do next is the harder question.

Investors should ask themselves a few key questions. Is it essentially the same, in which case the original positions can be restored? Or is the world radically different?

Consider first two categories of wounded assets: European defense contractors and gold.

The case for European defense companies is still pretty good, if not even better than at the end February.

Our analysis on the gold front shows that mining firms are poised to generate record-breaking cash flows, while trading at a discount to their historical average valuations. This thesis is still valid, given that recent gold price weakness wasn't likely driven by a fundamental change in investor sentiment.

You can also take a look at South Korean chip stock prices, which have fallen sharply in value since the beginning of the war.

These stocks were the big winners of the first two month of the year. They rose more than 50%. This was due to the massive amount of capital being deployed by large technology companies for artificial intelligence hardware.

Why did they retreat? The war did not change much for the companies themselves. They were located in a region that was vulnerable and, perhaps most importantly, the stock prices had risen the most.

In February, Korean stocks were trading at a level nearly 40% higher than their 200-day moving average. The momentum score was also the highest of any market segment. Companies like SK Hynix gained 400% in the previous 12 months.

A retreat was to be expected. The retracement in the last few weeks was excessive, especially for large and cash-generating firms.

Asia's dependence on Middle East oil - and the rise in Asian fuel costs - are serious risks for the region. It could potentially affect the outlook of these companies if it persists.

In some cases, the crisis can change fundamentals in a short time, which can lead to mismatches in?price' and 'value.

This may be true for oil companies. Brent crude has soared to over $100 per barrel after Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of world oil used to transit. Oil producers' shares haven't kept up with the price of crude oil. This 'gap' could present an opportunity.

It is important to know the difference between a fundamental shift and a technical recalibration when navigating markets.

Helen Jewell is the author of this article. She is International CIO for Fundamental Equities at BlackRock. This column is intended for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice. This column is interesting to you? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, X and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.

(source: Reuters)