Latest News

Russell: The price of crude oil makes Trump TACO less likely to trade:

The crude oil markets still price in a resolution of the Middle East conflict that will result in the full opening of the Strait of Hormuz.

In pricing this outcome, the market actually makes it more likely that the narrow waterway which serves as a channel for as much as 20 percent of the world’s oil supply remains closed.

The market still expects U.S. president Donald Trump to deliver TACO - the acronym for Trump always?Chickens out.

Trump can continue the conflict by maintaining the price of paper crude oil below the level that would allow for a return to normal flow from the Persian Gulf. This is because he believes the global market, which includes crude and refined products, is not yet in a crisis.

It's a Catch-22. The paradoxical, no-win situation popularized by Joseph Heller in his 1961 novel with the same title.

Brent crude futures, the global benchmark for oil prices, were trading at around $111.81 per barrel during early Asian trade Monday. They had risen by 54% from the $72.48 close on February 27, a day before Israel and the U.S. launched an air campaign against Iran.

Brent reached a high of $139.13 per barrel when Russia invaded Ukraine on February 20, 2022.

The Russian attack on Ukraine is different from the conflict currently raging in the Middle East because the Russian action did not result in significant losses of crude oil and refined products.

China and India stepped in to fill the gap left by European countries' halting of purchases of Russian crude oil and products. The disruption was limited mainly to the rerouting and pricing.

The situation today is quite different. Most of the 20,000,000 barrels of crude and refined products, which normally transit the Strait of Hormuz per day, are no longer available.

Even with the increased flow of crude oil and refined products from the United Arab Emirate of Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman and Saudi Arabia's Yanbu Port in the Red Sea, the world is likely to lose at least 12,000,000 barrels of product per day.

The International Energy Agency's moves to release their stockpiles, and the waiver of U.S. sanctions against Russian oil and Iranian crude in water are only temporary solutions that don't do much to solve the problem.

HORMUZ is the only game

The Strait of Hormuz is the single key to global supply. The longer it remains closed for most vessel traffic, the more strain will be put on the world's supplies.

Singapore jet fuel prices are already showing the strain in Asia. The price of oil has more than doubled from the low of $93.45 per barrel on February 27.

The highest price of jet fuel was $173.69 per barrel during the price spike after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. This shows that physical traders did not perceive the same risk as the current war with Iran.

The market must ask itself how high crude oil futures will have to go before Trump is forced to deliver on the TACO deal, instead of the current mixed message word salad.

Trump has, in recent weeks, veered from claiming that the conflict would be over soon to threatening "obliteration" of Iran's energy installations if the Strait of Hormuz was not reopened.

This move and the likely Iranian attacks on energy infrastructure in the Gulf do not sound like the necessary de-escalation to control crude oil futures.

It seems that the de-escalation of tensions and the re-opening strait are getting further apart with every passing day.

The history shows that long-running, intractable conflict is usually resolved only when one side achieves a decisive victory in a war. This is unlikely to happen in the current conflict, or when most parties begin to align their interests for peace.

Trump wants to end the conflict quickly to increase the chances that his Republican Party will win the November mid-term elections. But his ego also needs a victory even if only his domestic political base believes it.

Israel is determined to eliminate Iran from the world as a serious threat. It does not seem to care if a severe recession occurs worldwide if they continue to wage war.

Iran's authoritarian regime, which has achieved its first goal of survival, might believe that prolonging the conflict will give it more leverage to negotiate favorable terms for any settlement.

Russia is probably laughing to the bank, and wants the war on indefinitely.

China believes it has a large oil stockpile that will protect it from the worst effects. However, the longer the conflict continues, the more likely economic consequences for the heavily trade-dependent Chinese economy.

Almost every nation in Asia, Africa and Europe wants the war to end quickly, as they fear the economic effects of a prolonged lack of crude oil from the Gulf. Fuel-importing nations are particularly at risk.

Lack of alignment increases the likelihood of war continuing or even getting worse.

The global economy is likely to be faced with a loss of at least 10% of its crude oil supply and refined products.

The question is not about demand, but rather supply.

The global economic impact of reducing demand by 10 million bpd is not evenly distributed. Regions like Asia and Africa will likely suffer more.

Even in wealthy countries, governments often lack the fiscal power to combat an increase in energy prices and their accompanying economic downturn.

You like this column? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. ROI provides data-driven, thought-provoking analysis on everything from soybeans to swap rates. The markets are changing faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, X.

These are the views of the columnist, an author for.

(source: Reuters)