Latest News

OPEC+’s 'healthy crude oil market' looks like catching a flu: Russell

The OPEC+ group's increased supply is not based on the reasons they claim.

On May 3, the eight OPEC+ member countries who have agreed to voluntary production cuts decided to relax their curbs for June. This time, they added back 411,000 barrels a day (bpd).

Calculations show that the June increase will bring the combined April, May, and June increases to 960,000 bpd. This represents a 44% reduction of the 2.2million bpd decrease.

In a statement posted on the website of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, the eight stated that the decision to increase output was made due to "the current healthy market fundamentals as reflected by the low oil inventory."

OPEC+ has a problem because there is no evidence that the market is healthy. While crude inventories may be slightly lower than five-year averages, they are still far too high to cause any concern.

The OPEC report for April shows that the commercial crude oil inventories of developed economies within the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) were 2.746 million barrels as of the end February. This is down 16.1 millions barrels compared to the previous month and 71,000,000 barrels below their five-year average.

Other words, OECD stock prices were only 2.5% lower than the average for the past five years. This seems reasonable, given the rise in crude oil prices between September and January, and the increased risk of a global slowdown following Donald Trump's return to the U.S. Presidency.

China, as the world's largest oil importer does not disclose its strategic or commercial inventories. However, it is likely that the storage flow in March was significantly increased after a slight decrease in the first two month of the year.

Based on official data, calculations based upon imports and domestic production as well as refinery throughput in March showed that China imported significantly more crude oil than it refined into fuels.

What can we make of OPEC+ claiming "healthy" fundamentals?

ASIA IMPORTS

It is instructive to look at the situation in Asia. This region is the largest importer of crude oil and accounts for about 60% of all seaborne volumes.

After a weak month of February, Asia's seaborne exports rebounded in March and April. According to commodity analysts Kpler, arrivals were 25,27 million bpd & 25.28 millions bpd.

It was an increase from 23,31 million bpd and 23,94 million bpd for January and February.

For the first four month of 2025, Asia's seaborne exports were still 280,000 bpd lower than the same period of 2024. This is hardly indicative of a healthy demand.

The increase in March-April was largely due to the increased imports from China. These were temporary factors.

Arrivals in March were boosted by an increase in imports of crude oil from Iran. Refiners bought cheaper crude as they feared increased U.S. restrictions on Iranian shipments.

China's imports of Russian crude oil increased in April after a decline in March due to tighter U.S. sanctions on ships carrying Russian crude.

In the coming months, there is also a mixed outlook for crude oil demand.

The trade war started by Trump is likely to start reducing oil demand.

The massive 145% import tariff from China has already reduced container shipping and is likely to affect air freight as well in the coming weeks.

The decline in consumer confidence will likely affect air and road travel.

Even if the trade tensions ease, the shipping slowdown is likely to continue for at least the next few months. It may even be longer because it will take some time for supply chain to recover or reworked.

What is the real goal of OPEC+ in increasing output?

All of the answers are valid.

Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of the group, may be trying to get other members to lower their prices in order to increase quote compliance.

Saudi Arabia may also try to meet Trump's demands for lower prices. This would help him fulfill a campaign pledge to lower energy costs. However, it would come at the expense of the U.S. Oil Industry that he had promised to boost.

OPEC+ could also try to limit oil production in other major producers such as the United States or Brazil due to their higher costs of production.

It's difficult to argue anything but a negative case for oil, at least in the months ahead, as the likelihood of lower demand increases.

Brent futures fell as much as 3.7% during early Asian trading to a low price of $58.50 a barrel, down from a close of $61.29 a barrel on May 2.

These are the views of a columnist who writes for.

(source: Reuters)