Latest News

Joachim Klement: Why NATO should ask Ukraine for assistance

Western governments are re-arming, but may be spending billions on the wrong arsenals. Drones and algorithms are just as important as tanks and missiles. Ukraine could be in a good position to show what the West needs today. Last week, at the NATO summit held in Ankara (Turkey),?U.S. The President Donald Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and others noted that Ukraine was able to use drone technology to strike Russian energy infrastructure. They called this an "escalation," which they believed could lead to the resolution of the conflict. The European Union is looking to rearm itself, due to the amount of traditional weapons it has sent to Ukraine, and because Trump wants NATO members to invest more in their own defense. They could turn to Ukrainian companies and experts who have designed drones that have helped Kyiv to survive the years-long onslaught. According to the Ukraine Tracker of the Kiel Institute for the World Economy's Ukraine Support Tracker, European nations sent military aid to Ukraine totaling EUR213 billion (USD242.6 billion). The U.S. military assistance to Kyiv has totaled EUR115 billion by the end of 2026.

The majority of these sums do not represent cash expenditures but rather the value of inventory of "old paradigm" weapons systems such as artillery, tank and missiles that were shipped to Ukraine.

The European governments are now faced with a strategic decision: either they replenish these stocks, or rethink their next purchases.

What to buy? The U.S. and Israeli war with Iran and the war in Ukraine have shown that drones, electronic war, and AI are likely to be the future of warfare. Traditional weaponry will be needed in the short term. Ukraine requested a license for the manufacture of U.S. Patriot interceptor missiles because they are still the best defense against Russia's missiles.

Western powers must adapt if war becomes cheaper, smaller and more agile.

Use of a Patriot interceptor is a sensible way to stop a ballistic rocket. It makes no sense to use either a Patriot missile (costing about $4 million) or a THAAD, with a price of between $12 and $15 million, to take out an Iranian or Russian Shahed, which costs anywhere from $20,000 to $50,000.

However, many European militaries are still stuck in an old mindset. Kiel Institute warned recently that the total amount spent on procurement in 2024-2025 for new-paradigm weaponry like drones would be?only 12%. Poland, which is one of the European Union countries most vulnerable to future Russian aggressions, has increased its focus on cutting-edge technology. Germany and Britain, however, have seen their share fall over time.

'DRONE DEAL'

Ukraine is a better option than ordering expensive fighter jets and missile systems. It has experience in 21st century battlefield conditions. Ukraine, which has the largest drone industry and most advanced drones, is the world's leading manufacturer of military drones. Its technology has been proven on the battlefield. Ukraine did not have any significant manufacturing facilities for drones, or first-person-view (FPV), which are tiny, inexpensive cameras-equipped drones that can be controlled through a screen or headset. By the 2025 NATO Summit, Volodymyr Zelenskiy claimed that Ukraine was capable of producing 8 million drones a year.

Ukraine offers more and more "drone deals", or drones, to its allies. Kyiv offers support and expertise for the development of drones and radar systems, as well as other electronic devices in exchange with conventional arms or investments into Ukrainian defence manufacturing. The country recently stated that it hopes to reach such agreements with seven NATO countries by the year's end.

European countries are advancing, especially smaller ones that do not have a military-industrial complex. Denmark was one of the first countries to sign a drone deal with Ukraine, and Copenhagen-headquartered MITS Industries will be offering "drones-as-a-service" to Western countries, meaning providing engineering assistance and data. As part of the drone deal, Ukraine and Latvia announced that they would invest in a drone factory located on Latvian soil.

Saab, the French drone manufacturer Parrot and Ukrainian companies are working together to develop know-how they can use to compete with established players such as Thales and Leonardo. Established?defence companies are developing more and more new-paradigm weapon systems. However, they could lag behind the upstarts who have specialist knowledge, and be hindered by their size, bureaucracy, and longer lead times. These large, legacy defence contractors risk being overtaken by more agile competitors in certain specialized areas if they don't adapt quickly.

NEW PRIORITIES After a multi-month conflict, the U.S. must also rearm. The Center for Strategic & International Studies estimates that the United States has spent between 25 to 51 months replenishing its stock of advanced weapons, such as the Patriot and THAAD systems of air defence.

The U.S. is not only restocking these systems but also re-examining their military strategy, taking a cue from Ukraine. The Department of Defense announced on July 1 that it would consolidate all Unmanned and Autonomous Systems. This is because the U.S. wants to "rapidly" accelerate the development, acquisition, and deployment of autonomous capabilities.

It would be wise for large defence contractors around the world to take note and ensure that they are in contact with Kyiv. One of the greatest risks that they face is complacency in a battlefield that is rapidly changing.

You like this column? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.

(source: Reuters)