Latest News

OPEC+ loses influence in Iran War as China gains influence

OPEC+ loses influence in Iran War as China gains influence
OPEC+ loses influence in Iran War as China gains influence

Six months after the 'Iran War,' the world’s most powerful oil coalition, OPEC+ finds itself in a new position. It is unable to influence a marketplace it?once shaped.

The war has eroded OPEC's share of the market and its ability to influence prices. The group's policy decisions and statements barely affect oil markets any more.

Analysts describe the worst ever supply disruption as a major factor in balancing oil markets.

OPEC+, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (and its allies, including Russia), accounted for 40% of the global oil production in July. Calculations based on data from the International Energy Agency? were used. This is down from 48% in February before Israel and the U.S. attacked Iran. However, four to five percentage point of that decline was due to the United Arab Emirates withdrawing from OPEC.

OPEC+’s core group, which includes Saudi Arabia and Russia as well, accounted only for a quarter (25%) of the world's oil production in July.

The war has?reduced OPEC+’s ability to quickly increase or cut supply, by effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz. This is a major export route for Saudi Arabia, OPEC's top producer and other members like Iraq and Kuwait.

OPEC was founded in 1960 and expanded to OPEC+ in 2016, when Russia and other oil producers joined forces with the group to counter its declining?share of global oil production.

OPEC's global crude oil output peaked in the 1970s at around 50%. By the mid-1980s, however, the share had dropped to 30% as the North Sea and Alaska production increased.

OPEC has not responded to a comment request. OPEC+ claims that its decisions aim to support market stability, and do not target a particular oil price.

OPEC has experienced supply disruptions during wartime before, including in Kuwait during the 1990-1991 Gulf War and Iraq after the 2003 U.S. led invasion. The scale of this outage is unprecedented, as it affects multiple producers at once, making it difficult for OPEC to compensate for losses elsewhere.

Since March, the core OPEC+ has announced six increases in oil production. The Hormuz Blockade has kept most of these decisions on paper. They have had little impact on oil prices except for a brief U.S./Iran ceasefire in July that sparked hopes that Hormuz might reopen.

The contrast between 2019 and 2018 is stark. The contrast with 2019 is striking.

The key question at that time was how much oil OPEC+ decided to pump. The focus now is on how much oil can be physically produced and exported during a Middle East conflict.

The steep drop in Chinese oil imports has been one of the major price drivers for this year. China has purchased roughly 400 million barrels less oil since the start of the war than it did during the same time last year. The decline is due to a ban on fuel imports, lower refining production and the increasing use of electric vehicles. This?trend highlights China's increasing role in balancing the oil markets. A?role that was once almost exclusively associated with OPEC+, as the world's pivotal producer. China's lower demand for oil this year has contributed to a price ceiling. In contrast, China's buying spree in the past year, which could have accounted up to half of the global growth in oil demand, has helped support the market. June Goh is an analyst with Sparta Commodities. She said, "They have become the swing centre for demand."

(source: Reuters)