Latest News
-
First Foundations for 1.6GW German Offshore Wind Project Reach Dutch Port
The first eight foundations for the Nordeseecluster, a 1.8GW offshore wind project being built in the German North Sea, have arrived and been offloaded in the Dutch base port Eemshaven.The foundations are around 85 meters long on average and weigh approximately 1,500 tonnes each, the equivalent to the weight of around 800 cars.Built by RWE, the offshore wind project will consist of Nordseecluster A with 660MW, with commissioning expected in 2027, and Nordseecluster B with additional 900MW to follow in 2029.A total of 45 of monopile foundations will pass through the Buss Terminal in Eemshaven in 2025 - 44 of them are to carry the wind turbines, and one will support the transformer substation.RWE, TotalEnergies Pick Buildout Base for Dutch Offshore Wind FarmThe large-scale foundations were manufactured and delivered by Dajin Heavy Industry.Beginning in summer 2025, the foundations will be shipped from the base port in Eemshaven out to the construction site at sea, which is located around 50 kilometers north of the island of Juist.The 44 wind turbines for Nordseecluster A will be erected in 2026 and fully connected to the grid at the start of 2027, while Nordseecluster B will contribute additional 60 wind turbines.Vestas will supply its V236-15.0 MW offshore wind turbines for the project.“With the delivery and safe unloading of the first foundations by Dajin, we have passed an important milestone on the way to building our Nordseecluster. With an overall capacity of around 1.6 gigawatts, it is the largest wind project currently being built off the German coast.“We need an enormous amount of storage space and an excellent port infrastructure for the construction process – both of which are available at the Buss Terminal Eemshaven. We are currently creating synergies by also handling the foundations for our Danish offshore wind farm Thor at this port and will use it as the base for our Dutch OranjeWind project as well,” said Thomas Michel, COO RWE Offshore Wind.Once fully operational, the Nordseecluster will generate enough green electricity to supply the equivalent of around 1.6 million households.
-
British Steel Industry Calls for Help with Electricity Prices
The British steel industry is calling on the government to lower electricity prices, which it claims can be up to 50% higher than their European competitors. This week, the steel industry was hit with a 25% duty on exports to America that represent around 9% in value of Britain's exports of steel. Frank Aaskov is the Director of Energy and Climate Change Policy for industry group UK Steel. He said, "Uncompetitive electric prices must be addressed in order to ensure that the steel industry thrives, secures thousands of jobs and safeguards national steel production, as geopolitical turmoil increases." The group, which represents the country's main steel producers, has called on the government to set fixed electricity prices for the sector via a contract-for-difference. The system stipulates that if wholesale electric prices exceed a certain threshold, called the strike price (or the minimum level), the government will subsidise any difference. If they fall below this threshold, then the steel producers are responsible for paying the difference. The steel industry commissioned a report from the consultancy Baringa that said "the strike price could reflect changes in wholesale energy prices at regular intervals and provide the sector with much needed protection from price volatility." According to the Baringa report, UK producers are paying around 68 pounds for each megawatt-hour (MWh), compared to 52 pounds/MWh Germany and 44 pounds/MWh France. The government announced last month that it would launch a consultation to develop a strategy in the steel industry. It said they hoped to invest 2,5 billion pounds ($3,23 billion) as well as examine issues such high energy costs. A spokesperson for the government said that through a package to support industry, it was already "bringing energy costs of steel closer in line" with those of other major economies. This fully exempts eligible companies from certain costs associated with renewable energy policies. Especially those exposed to high electricity prices, such as steel. Steel UK is made up of British Steel, Liberty Steel, and Tata Steel. ($1 = 0.7738 pound) (Reporting by Susanna Twidale, editing by David Evans & Barbara Lewis)
-
Buffett rejects shareholder proposals, Olson steps down as director of Berkshire Hathaway
Berkshire Hathaway announced on Friday that longtime director Ronald Olson would be leaving the board due to a new policy requiring all directors except Warren Buffett to step down when they reach 80. In its proxy statement for the company's annual meeting on May 3, in Omaha, Nebraska Berkshire said that its board had unanimously recommended rejecting seven shareholder proposals. This included three regarding its subsidiaries' anti-discrimination and diversity efforts. Berkshire said Buffett will also receive $405,111 by 2024. This includes his $100,000 salary plus personal security and home protection. Vice Chairman Greg Abel and vice chairman Ajit Jain, who are expected to succeed Buffett in the role of chief executive, saw their compensation increase from $1 million to $21 millions each. Abel, 62 years old, is in charge of non-insurance companies such as BNSF Railroad and Berkshire Hathaway Energy. Jain, 73 years old, is in charge of insurance businesses like Geico auto insurance. Olson, 83, has been a Berkshire Director since 1997. He is a partner in the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson. The new age limit set by Berkshire Corporate Governance Guidelines has forced him to leave the 14-member Berkshire board. The other directors, except for Buffett, are all 75 years old or younger. Olson has not responded to comments immediately. Buffett's age is not a factor because he has 30.3% voting power in Berkshire, which triggers an exception. The 94 year old billionaire owns approximately 14.4% of Berkshire. If the independent directors wanted him to, he could continue to be a director after retiring. Shareholder resolutions include conservative investor proposals that Berkshire Report on its race-based initiatives and how it affects employees' employment based on race and color, religion, sex and national origin. Berkshire’s board said that both reports were unnecessary. It stated that subsidiaries had their own policies, and “Berkshire’s approach is straightforward - do what's right and follow the law." The board opposed the proposal to create a diversity and inclusion committee, stating that its audit committee oversees all diversity issues. The company also argued that a proposal for independent directors to oversee the risks associated with artificial intelligent was unnecessarily and incompatible with Berkshire’s decentralized culture.
-
S&P raises Saudi Arabia’s rating due to its sustained economic shift away oil
S&P, a global ratings agency, raised Saudi Arabia's credit rating from 'A to 'A+ with a stable outlook' on Friday. This was based on the ongoing social-economic transformation of the country. Fitch stated that the Vision 2030 project of the country provides flexibility in managing capital spending and debt issuance. This report stated that the sustained momentum of this project could help boost activity in the construction, manufacturing, and mining sectors to spur GDP growth between 2025-2028. The ratings agency said earlier this week that it expected the Saudi government to reduce capex, and current spending associated with them in 2025. Fitch stated that Saudi Arabia is aiming to diversify their economy and move away from its dependence on hydrocarbons. The current investments will boost the consumption of Saudi Arabia's youth population, as well as increase the productivity capacity of the country. Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund signed last week a new Memorandum of Understanding worth $3 billion with Italy’s state export credit agency SACE. Rating agency SACE said that this would help maintain the debt of the country. Fitch expects the current oil price sensitivity will continue to erode fiscal and external balances until 2028. The Saudi giant Aramco is expected to further reduce oil revenues due to its declining dividend.
-
Cobre Panama Mine ready to suspend arbitration with Panama
First Quantum, which has closed its Cobre Panama mine, instructed its lawyers on Friday to begin work to suspend arbitration proceedings against Panama. The President of Panama announced on Thursday that his government would allow the exportation of 120,000 tons of copper concentrate, which has been trapped in the closed mine for more than two years. Later, the country’s commerce ministry stated that any negotiations with miner would only be possible if Panama dropped the arbitration case. Manuel Aizpurua is the manager of Cobre Panama. In a memo seen by, he stated that "we have instructed our attorneys to meet with the legal team of the government to work on a suspension of the arbitrations... leading to a resolution that benefits workers and communities as well as suppliers, as well. First Quantum confirmed that the memo was authentic. The shares of the Canadian mining company were up 1% at the Toronto Stock Exchange on Friday after reaching a two-month peak on Thursday. They had risen 15% following news of the approval of copper export. First Quantum was ordered by the Panamanian government under Mulino to close down the open pit Cobre Panama mine at the end of 2023 after protests about environmental concerns. This led to concerns about the maintenance of this massive site, and also 120,000 metric tonnes of copper concentrate that was piled up. The mine, which accounted for 1% global copper production, was one of the top sources in the world before its closure. Mulino said at a press conference held on Thursday that he authorized the removal of copper products that were stranded in the mine. He argued that the copper was being wasted, and that Panama will need to reimbursed after the products have been processed outside the country. The president stated that he will review the future of mine in greater detail as early as next week. Mulino stated, "The mine issue will be handled with great care and always keeping in mind the national interest." We'll begin next week. Reporting by Divyarajagopal and Elidamoreno, Editing by Anthony Esposito & David Gregorio
-
Gold investors flock to gold amid Trump-driven turmoil
Investors looking for a safe haven from the political and economic volatility triggered the new U.S. Administration are increasingly turning to gold Exchange-Traded Funds. This is adding momentum to market's record rally. Gold prices have been rising steadily since U.S. president Donald Trump assumed office in January. His radical policy changes, such as trade tariffs and comments that he wants to annex Greenland, along with his unconventional diplomatic approach to end the conflict in Ukraine, has led to successive record highs. Analysts say that the shift in policy has tempted even U.S. Investors who have traditionally preferred equities. Gold reached its latest record on Friday at $3,004.86 per ounce. This represents a 14% increase since the beginning of 2025. In 2024, it had grown by 27%. Gold holdings of Europe listed exchange traded funds have increased by 46,7 metric tons (a 3.6% increase) to 1,334.3 tonnes since the beginning of 2025. This is in contrast to 2021-2024, which was marked by large outflows. As the market continues to move into overbought terrain, further inflows may provide support. Investors such as real money manager, particularly those in the West, needed to be sufficiently scared by a stock market and growth scare for them to return back into gold. Ole Hansen is the head of commodity strategy for Saxo Bank. These investors have now returned to gold after leaving it in 2022, when the Federal Reserve started its rate-hiking cycles. But with other markets showing signs of weakness and the possibility of even lower funding rates for the future, the other markets are now showing signs that they will suffer. Retail investors in the United States are wary about stock markets following Monday's crash, when the benchmark S&P 500 registered its largest drop of this year. Analysts believe that this will increase demand for gold, as it is a safe haven from the turmoil. Alexander Zumpfe is a precious metals dealer at Heraeus Metals. He says that some U.S. investors are less concerned about global risks because they have more confidence in their own economy. However, recent inflows to North American gold ETFs suggest that gold is becoming a popular hedge in the U.S. Gold holdings of ETFs in the United States have increased by 68.1 tons this year, or 4.3%. They now total 1,649.8 tonnes. EQUITIES LOSS COULD BE GOLDS' GAIN Hansen, from Saxo, said that Trump's policies had triggered a withdrawal of cash from U.S. stock markets, which attracted investors for many years. Gold could benefit, at least short-term. Retail investors around the world are eager to get exposure to gold. Adrian Ash, BullionVault’s head of research, stated that the number of people purchasing gold online for the first time jumped to its highest level since May 2021 in February. Ash stated that the gold investor demand at BullionVault was higher than customer profit taking by 0.2 tons, which is the highest level since June 2023. Analysts say that despite all the positive signs for the market, the gold price may not rise, as the signs of an overbought market are evident. John Reade is a senior market strategist with WGC. He said that for gold to remain above $3,000 an ounce, the demand from retail bars and coins in Europe and North America would have to increase further, and/or the central bank purchases intensify. After a recent slump, the only thing that has been increasing in Germany is demand for gold bars and coin. (Reporting and editing by Polina Devtt, Veronica Brown, Barbara Lewis and Pratima Dasai)
-
Ukrainian authorities claim that an anti-Russian activist was killed in Odesa.
The authorities have not ruled out Russian involvement. A prominent anti-Russian protester was killed in Odesa, a Ukrainian port city on Friday. Demian Hansul, 31, was identified as the victim. Local media reported that he had taken part in the Maidan Revolution of 2014 against Ukraine's pro-Russian President. Media reported that he was also a former member of the extreme-right Right Sector. Telegram: "The incident qualifies as a premeditated killing committed on order." Security Service reported that a 46-year old military deserter was detained and treated as a suspect. On Telegram local, the Telegram said that possible motives for this crime were being investigated. This included a link to Russia. A video uploaded on Telegram local claimed to have captured the moment of shooting. The video showed a burly, bald man with a gun pointing at the head of an unidentified man who was lying on the pavement. He fired, then walked away. The authenticity of the clip could not be verified. Russian state media had previously branded Hanul a neo Nazi responsible for a May 2014 arson attack at the Trade Union House, Odessa. This was a reference then to violent fighting between pro Russian activists and supporters of Ukrainian unification. In April 2024, a Moscow court in absentia charged Hanul with several crimes. These included damaging Soviet-era monuments of war for which he could have faced up 20 years in prison. In July, several media outlets reported that Hanul requested Ukrainian police protection following threats. (Reporting and editing by Gareth Jones, Angus MacSwan and Yuliia dysa)
-
Greenland's Democrats are looking for a broad coalition of Democrats to stand united in the face of Trump's pressure
Greenland's parties must put aside their differences and quickly form a wide coalition government in order to show unity against a U.S. annexation campaign, said the Democrats on Friday following this week's elections. Jens-Frederik Nielson, leader of a pro-business party that favors a gradual separation from Denmark, expressed in a post on Facebook the urgency of the current situation following introductory coalition discussions. This is not the moment for internal disputes and political tactics. He said that the situation in our country was far too grave for such tactics. "We stand together when someone threatens us or looks down upon us. Donald Trump, the President of the United States, said on Thursday that the U.S. needs to control Greenland in order to improve international security. When asked about the possibility of an annexation, he replied: "I believe it will happen." On Friday, the leaders of Greenland's Inatsisartut Parliament's five parties rejected Trump's remarks. In a joint press release, they stated that "we - all the party leaders – cannot accept the repeated remarks about annexation of Greenland and its control." They said that "we find this behavior unacceptable towards friends and ally in a defense alliance", adding that they condemned any attempts to cause division. The Democrats, which more than tripled to 10 seats in the chamber of 31, have advocated a responsible mining of Greenland’s vast, but largely untapped, mineral resources as a way to develop the economy, as the semiautonomous territory transitions towards full independence from Denmark. Naleraq, which is strongly pro-independence, came in second place at Tuesday's elections. It doubled its number of seats from four to eight. (Reporting and editing by Hugh Lawson, Christina Fincher and Louise Breusch Rasmussen)
Russell: The term critical minerals is meaningless and needs a new strategy.
It is now so common to use the term critical mineral that its original meaning has been lost.
It is time to create a new definition of what is truly vital for a nation and what is simply important.
The Mining Indaba conference held in Cape Town last week also made it clear that what's important to one country may not be as critical to another.
What is a better way to define a critical mineral than by its name?
It's simply a mineral you don't possess and worry you will not be able get it in the future.
You need a certain mineral, but don't possess any domestic reserves. Your strong allies don't also have enough deposits, and you do not have control over the supply chain.
This is a different mineral from what commodity analysts CRU call a core ore, which you may need now but are confident you can source in the future.
Why is it important to distinguish between the two?
Westerners tend to view core minerals as ones that can be left to the market to supply. They rely on private mining firms to explore, develop, and produce them on commercial terms.
A truly critical mineral will require a different acquisition strategy, including direct funding of new mines, strategic relationships with the host country, and offtake agreements not dependent on market prices.
China has shown that it is much better at focusing on minerals they deem critical. It invests in mines, infrastructure and processing plants in other countries, and also in its own country.
China is the largest importer of commodities in the world. It dominates the global supply chain of minerals essential to the energy transformation, including lithium, cobalt and nickel.
These four minerals are no surprise to China, but are they still important for China, given that China dominates the production and supply of these minerals?
Beijing's approach to ensuring supply was more strategic than commercial.
Copper, aluminium and graphite are also included on the list of critical minerals for the United States as well as the European Union.
Iron ore, gold potash, and uranium are among the critical minerals on China's list.
One could argue that these minerals are critical to China's economy, and are also ones in which Beijing has little influence on the supply chain.
Consider iron ore as an example. China imports over 80% of what it needs. Of those imports, more than 90% are from Australia, Brazil, and South Africa.
Beijing has no control over these resources, despite its ownership of some companies that mine iron ore. It is a price taker and has been for the last two decades.
NEW TACTICS NEEDED
The United States and Europe could be asked why copper is included on their list of critical minerals, when there is no threat to the supply. This is because most of the copper mined in the world is controlled by Western firms, which are located in countries with a strong Western alignment.
Aluminium and lithium are also important, but cobalt's importance for energy transition is still being questioned.
Nickel is a fascinating case. Both the United States and European Union consider it critical but have not done anything to guarantee supply.
They have instead allowed Chinese-controlled mining and processing plants to dominate the Indonesian market, while others in countries such as Australia, a strong ally of China's, are closed due to low prices.
It would make sense to continue to supply nickel from allies, even if the cost was higher.
If Western countries are truly concerned about the security of minerals like graphite and tungsten, they must change their approach to developing mines.
Western mining companies have difficulty securing long-term financing because they cannot guarantee the price that will be paid in several years, when a new mine is built and operational.
They lose out to Chinese firms that are less concerned about commercial results.
Western governments must also become more proactive when it comes to engaging countries in resource-based relationships, utilizing both soft power like aid programmes and direct benefits like market access to foster stronger resource relationships.
It appears, however, that U.S. president Donald Trump has adopted the exact opposite strategy, abandoning all aid and threatening to impose widespread tariffs against both allies and enemy alike.
The European Union appears to be moving at a snail's pace. It produces policies and reports about critical minerals, but does not seem to do much to develop the supply chains that it controls.
These are the views of the columnist, an author for.
(source: Reuters)