Latest News
-
State news agency reports that attacks have reduced Saudi oil production and East-West pipeline flows.
Saudi state-run news agency SPA reported on Thursday that attacks on Saudi energy plants 'have reduced the kingdom's capacity to produce oil by 600,000 barrels per day, and its East-West pipeline throughput by 700,000 barrels per days, according to an official source at the energy ministry. SPA reported that the attacks, as well as previous strikes against some facilities, disrupted key operations in Riyadh and Yanbu Industrial City. SPA reported that seven Saudi employees, including one Saudi national who was part of the industrial security staff at the Saudi energy company, were injured in the attack. Sources in the ministry did not say who fired the missiles. Saudi Arabia has been 'under attack by hundreds of Iranian missiles, drones, and drones, since the beginning of the U.S. Israel war with Iran. Most of these were intercepted. Tehran has launched attacks on Israel and Gulf Arab countries that host U.S. Military installations. The source from the ministry said that one of the 'pumping stations' on the East-West pipeline in the Kingdom was damaged, which reduced throughput by 700,000 bpd. The source said that the pipeline is currently the main route to supply global markets. Source: The Manifa oilfield, which was also attacked, saw its production capacity reduced by about 300,000 barrels per day. A previous attack at the Khurais facility had already cut production capacity in Saudi Arabia by another 300,000 barrels per day. This brings the total Saudi production reduction to around 600,000 barrels per day, the source said. SPA reported that the attacks affected major refineries, such as SATORP in Jubail, Ras Tanura, SAMREF in Yanbu, and Riyadh, which directly affected exports of refined goods to global markets. Fires also affected processing facilities in Ju'aymah, which impacted exports of natural gas liquids and liquefied petrol gas. As conflict spreads throughout the region, the?strikes against key oilfields and pipeline infrastructure as well as refining hubs highlight the risks to the global energy supply. Saudi Arabia, the top oil exporter in the world, is a major player on global crude markets. A disruption of its production, refinery system, or export routes for a long time could cause a shortage and increase price volatility. According to the ministry source, continued attacks will reduce supply and slow recovery. This would affect energy security in consuming countries. It would also increase volatility on oil markets. SPA reported that the disruption has already depleted a large portion of emergency and operational inventories, limiting their ability to compensate for supply shortages. (Reporting and editing by Enas Alashray and Yomna ehab)
-
Lula criticises Petrobras for reimbursing winners of LPG auction.
Petrobras, the state-run oil company in Brazil, announced?on Thursday that it would reimburse fuel distributors who had won an auction for liquefied petrol gas (LPG) in March. It will pay them the difference between what they bid and what import prices were at the time. Last week, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said that the government would seek an annulment of the 'auction in order to protect the consumers. He claimed that Petrobras sold liquefied petrol gas at prices which he described as 'too high due to the war with Iran. Petrobras stated that the reimbursement was to compensate for the effects of the auction on prices. The company also noted the "exceptional" nature of the market due to the Middle East war and regulatory body comments. Last week, the oil?regulator ANP conducted an 'inspection' of Petrobras' auctions of liquefied gas. The suspicion was that there had been price gouging. Petrobras announced that the reimbursement will be calculated based on the difference between the winning bids at the auction on March 31 and the import prices set by the ANP based on the period of March 23 to March 27. (Reporting and editing by Brendan O'Boyle, Daina Beth Solon, and Andre Romani)
-
Judge rules that despite a $250 million settlement with Berkshire, the unit still faces a lawsuit for brokerage commissions.
Federal Judge ruled Thursday that Berkshire Hathaway must face a proposed antitrust lawsuit claiming that it conspired with real estate agents to increase commissions paid by home sellers, despite the fact that its HomeServices of America agency settled similar claims for $250,000,000 in 2024. U.S. district judge Stephen Bough rejected Berkshire Hathaway Energy’s argument that its dealings with HomeServices were a single enterprise for antitrust purposes. This meant it would not owe any additional damages to the home sellers after HomeServices settled. Bough said that HomeServices settlement also reflected the parties' intention that Berkshire entities with deeper pockets not be excused. He cited an November 2024 filing in which HomeServices asked for the court to determine the fairness of the $250 million agreement against its own resources. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, as well as its attorneys, did not immediately reply to comments. Michael Ketchmark is a home seller's lawyer. He said that he was looking forward to the jury trial to show Berkshire Hathaway Energy’s role in "propping this conspiracy" to steal from homeowners. The Omaha-based conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway, led by CEO Greg Abel, and Chairman Warren Buffett ended 2025 with a total of $373.3 billion in cash and 'equivalents. The National Association of Realtors changed their real estate commission rules after a Missouri jury ordered them to pay $1.8 Billion to home sellers who claimed that they had been overcharged. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the?settlement was inadequate and voidable. The Appeals Court of the Circuit ruled that the?settlement was inadequate. In January, oral arguments were held. Attorneys for plaintiffs claim that settlements in commission suits, including those against companies who did not go to court, exceeded $1 billion. Reporting by Jonathan Stempel, New York Editing Rod Nickel
-
Gold gains more than 1%; spotlight on US-Iran truce and CPI data
Gold prices rose?over 1% Thursday, as a weakened U.S. Dollar lent?support. Investors assessed the durability and strength of a fragile truce between Washington and Tehran. They also awaited U.S. Consumer Price Index results. At 1:30 pm, spot gold was up by 1.6% to $4,789.67 an ounce. ET (1730 GMT), following a session in which gold reached a high of nearly three weeks. U.S. Gold Futures closed 0.9% higher, at $4.818.00. The U.S. dollar index fell. The dollar is weaker, making bullion more accessible to buyers of other currencies. Bob Haberkorn is a senior market strategist with RJO Futures. He said that the weaker dollar has helped gold to regain its footing. However, there are still some participants who are unsure of what the ceasefire actually means. He added that "the ceasefire headlines for gold were very bullish, but prices have pulledback from recent highs because cracks are showing." Israel has bombed additional targets in?Lebanon that Tehran insists must be included in a ceasefire. However, there is no indication Iran has lifted its blockade of Strait of Hormuz. The Federal Reserve could be forced to raise rates for longer if negotiations break down and the war flares up again. Gold, which is traditionally a hedge against inflation but does not yield any interest, could become less attractive. Morgan Stanley believes that gold will remain stable through the second quarter of this year before rebounding during the second half. It added that "if Fed hikes are avoided, gold could rebound. A resolution of the conflict would be also supportive, likely bringing focus back to?on debasement of fiat currencies." The markets are also awaiting the release of the Consumer Price Index data for March. Consumer Price Index for March is due on Friday. According to estimates, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index - which is the Fed's preferred?"inflation gauge – grew 2.8% over a 12-month period ending in February. It will likely rise further in March. Silver spot gained 2.9%, to $76.24 an ounce. Platinum rose 3.8%, to $2,106.01, and palladium climbed 0.3%, to $1,558.75. (Reporting and editing by Kirby Donovan, Niall Williams and Ashitha Anil in Bengaluru)
-
Some trades made ahead of Trump's policy changes raise questions
Experts have questioned whether some of Donald Trump's most important policy decisions were preceded by timely bets. This is a list. IRAN CEASEFIRE Announcement: April 7, 2026 Just hours before an announcement was made of a "ceasefire" between the U.S. LSEG data shows that at 1945 GMT, a total of 8,600 lots were sold for Brent and U.S. Crude futures. Trump announced at?around 2230 GMT a two week ceasefire with Iran. This caused crude?futures to drop by 15%, and below $100 per barrel, for the start of Wednesday’s official trading session. Separately the Associated Press reported a group new accounts on Polymarket's prediction market platform made timely bets about whether a ceasefire will be reached on 7 April. Trading yes-or no contracts allows users to wager on real-world events. The news agency cited publicly-available blockchain data from Polymarket, using crypto analytics platform Dune. This showed that at least 50 accounts or wallets placed "Yes" wagers before Trump posted his post. A wallet created at 10am ET the same day made $200,000 profit after wagering $72,000. Another user, who joined the platform in April, won $125,000. One wallet, created 12 minutes prior to Trump's announcement and raking in $48,500 from a wager of $31,908. Polymarket has not responded to a comment request. March 23, 2026: IRAN ATTACK pause. An unidentified trader bet $500,000,000 on Brent and WTI futures within a minute, shortly before Trump announced that he would delay the attack on Iran's energy infrastructure for five days. After Trump's announcement, oil prices dropped 15%. LSEG data show 5,100 lots traded between 1049 and 10:00 GMT. Selling dominated volume. Trump's announcement on social media at 1105 GMT caused over 13,000 lots to trade in 60 seconds. This is equivalent to 13,000,000 barrels. Brent fell to $99 from $112 per barrel and WTI to $86 from $99. February 28, 2026: IRAN STRIKES KILLED SUPREME OFFICER AYATOLLAH ALI KHAMENEI Wagers made on platforms such as Polymarket prior to the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah?Ali Khamenei increased scrutiny of prediction markets. Democratic lawmakers called for a prohibition on bets that are tied to military action, which could reward those who have privileged information. Kalshi faces a lawsuit because it failed to pay $54 million in winnings to those who had bet on Khamenei leaving office before March 1. The company claims that it doesn't offer markets that are settled on death. A review of Polymarket’s website revealed that at the time, $529 million had been wagered on a variety of contracts relating to the timings of U.S. and Israeli strikes against Iran. Another $150 million was bet on Khamenei being removed as supreme ruler. Bubblemaps, an analytics firm, identified six accounts which made a total profit of $1.2 million from Polymarket bets funded just hours before the raids on February 28. U.S. Rep. Mike Levin from California highlighted one particular Polymarket bet that was placed shortly before Iran's strikes. Separately traders moved the opposite way on February 27. Despite hotter than expected inflation data, which would normally prompt investors to sell Treasuries with a long maturity, they pushed yields on the 10-year benchmark note below 4%. Analysts say that such a shift to safe-haven assets is usually driven by macroeconomic events which are negative or expected to be so. The Dow Jones U.S. Airlines Index fell 5.13% that day, as oil prices increased. January 3, 2026 -- U.S. CAPTURE OF FORMER VENEZUELAN PRESIDENT NICOLASMADURO An unknown trader made a profit of approximately $410,000 in January after betting on the ouster Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. Before the weekend raid on Maduro’s Caracas compound by U.S. Special Forces, the trader’s account at Polymarket had built up positions on contracts that were tied to Maduro’s removal. The terms used?implied high odds. These wagers were worth $34,000 before his capture. However, their value soared after the news of U.S. military operations broke on January 3. Trading data shows that unidentified traders bet millions on a U.S. market rally just minutes before Trump announced his tariff pause. This led to a huge rally in April of last year. Trump's Truth Social post pausing the tariffs was at 1:18 pm. ET on April 9, causing a 9.5% increase in the S&P 500. Data from the market shows that certain option contracts have seen a surge in trading activity before it. Around 1 p.m., 5,105 call options for SPY were traded. The average price was $4.20. These calls could have risen as high as $42 when stocks rose, converting $2.14 into $21.44 on paper. Other SPY calls bet on the ETF going above $509 at 1:10 pm. ET;?their values jumped from $624,000 to $10 million at the end of the day. It was impossible to determine if the calls had been bought or sold all by the same trader, or by several traders and if the positions were closed with a profit. Kush Desai, White House spokesperson, said that government ethics guidelines prohibit federal employees from profiting from nonpublic information. In an email, he stated that any implication of Administration officials engaging in such activities without evidence was baseless and irresponsible.
-
Georgieva, IMF economist, says central banks need to balance energy inflation and demand softening.
Kristalina Georgeeva, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, said that central bankers should be ready to tighten their monetary policies to prevent an inflationary spiral, if war-related energy price shocks continue. They also need to "watch" for a softerening in demand, which would argue against a rate increase. Georgieva said at an event previewing next week's IMF/World Bank annual meetings, that if the Iran War ceasefire is maintained and the oil shock is brief-lived the central banks might be able to?hold rates steady with a only slight increase in inflation. This would equate to a "de-facto" easing of the monetary policy. She warned central bankers against a rush to tighten rates if they were slow to react to inflation after COVID-19, and told them to be alert to data. Georgieva warned: "Be careful, focus on the conditions. If you tighten up?prematurely or unnecessarily you will be putting a damper on growth." "And then, the demand could shrink. Then, you go from a shock of supply to a shock of supply and demand. It could get ugly." The Middle East war, which began February 28, disrupted shipping worldwide and caused an increase of 50% in oil prices. This week, the IMF warned that war would result in higher costs and slower growth regardless of the end date. Georgieva noted that the markets were expecting major central banks tightening their policies. She warned there was a risk that inflation expectations could 'break anchor' and spark a costly spiral of inflation. She said that although the short-term inflation expectations were higher, longer-term expectations were unchanged. She said that IMF officials worked with countries to help them create fiscal support packages, with sunset clauses, to ensure that they were temporary. They also stressed the importance of fiscal and monetary policy not being in opposition. She said that adding deficit-financed stimuli to the mix at this time would increase the burden of monetary policy. It would be like having one foot on the gas and the other on the brake. Not good. Reporting by David Lawder, Andrea Shalal and Chizu Nomiyama; editing by Andrea Ricci and Chizu nomiyama
-
Banxico Minutes reveal rift on inflation and Mideast war threats
The minutes of the latest policy meeting of the Bank of Mexico, published on Thursday, reveal that the board is deeply divided over how to balance 'new inflation risks', such as those posed by the escalating conflict in the Middle East, with the needs of an economy struggling. Minutes from the Bank of Mexico's latest policy meeting published on Thursday reveal a board deeply divided?over how to weigh?new inflation risks, including a resurging conflict in the Middle East, against the needs of a weak economy. The controversial decision saw Governor Victoria Rodriguez, deputies Omar Mejia, Gabriel?Cuadra and Jonathan Heath vote in favor of a cut. Galia Borja and Jonathan Heath dissented. The dissenting members called for a cautious approach due to the new uncertainty created by geopolitical tensions. Borja, in her dissension, said that the escalation of the Middle East conflict had increased oil prices and volatility on financial markets. This has introduced new risks for inflation as well as?economic activity. In my opinion, the information is not sufficient to accurately assess the 'implications' of this shock. The majority of the board argued, however, that Mexico's slow economy would act as a buffer to these inflationary pressures. In the minutes, it was noted that "most members believed that the ample slack in the Mexican economy will help to mitigate the impact of the shocks" from the conflict. The debate over how much weight to give to the Middle East conflict reflects an underlying philosophical difference: whether the primary mission of the central bank is to control?inflation, or if monetary policy should be used to stimulate Mexico's slow economy. Heath, who is the'most hawkish member of the board, called for a pause on rate cuts while current shocks subside. He also warned that lowering interest rates 'while core inflation continues and non-core inflation increases undermines the credibility of the bank. Heath, the?most hawkish on?the board, advocated for a pause in rate cuts until current shocks dissipate, and warned that easing the interest rate?while core inflation persists and non-core inflation rises undermines the bank's?credibility. The debate ?is particularly acute as Mexico navigates a challenging economic landscape, marked by both higher-than-projected inflation and a relatively stagnant economy--conditions that make every interest rate decision profoundly consequential. (Reporting and editing by Emily Green; Brendan O'Boyle, Natalia Siniawski)
-
Georgieva, IMF economist, says central banks need to balance energy inflation and demand softening.
Kristalina Georgeeva, the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, said on Thursday that central bankers should be ready to tighten their monetary policies if war-driven energy prices shocks continue. Georgieva said at an event previewing 'next week’s IMF/World Bank annual meetings that if the Iran War ceasefire is maintained and the oil supply shock is brief, they might be able to maintain a steady rate of inflation with only a small increase. This would result in a de facto easing of the monetary policy. She warned central bankers not to be tempted to tighten rates if they were slow to react to the?post COVID-19 inflation. She told them to remain alert to 'data. Georgieva warned: "Be careful, focus on the conditions. If you tighten too early and unnecessarily you will halt growth." Then the demand could shrink. Then, you'll go from a "supply shock" to a "supply-and-demand-shock." It could get ugly." Reporting by David Lawder, Editing by Chizu nomiyama
The Iran War increases demand for US fuel and boosts Gulf Coast refinery margins
Analysts and experts say that U.S. Gulf Coast refiners have the highest margins they've ever had as Middle Eastern oil flow disruptions resulting from the Iran War increase demand for U.S. exports of fuel.
Refiners in Asia and Europe have been impacted by the?slump of Middle Eastern crude exports as a result of Iran's blockade of Strait of Hormuz. This has forced some to reduce production.
The U.S. president Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that he has agreed to a ceasefire of two weeks with Iran. This agreement is conditional upon the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. However, tanker traffic continues to be limited, and there are still doubts about whether this fragile truce can last.
U.S. refiners are less dependent on Middle Eastern crude and can benefit from the global fuel shortages by maximising international sales through their U.S. Gulf Coast hub.
Refining capacity in the U.S. is about 18 million barrels a day (bpd), with most of it located on the Gulf Coast, which is the largest export hub.
Analysts said that independent refiners such as Marathon Petroleum, Phillips 66 and Valero Energy, which are located at the 'origin point' of the Colonial pipeline and have direct access marine export terminals are the winners in the market.
Jeff Krimmel is the founder of Krimmel Strategy. He said that U.S. refiners can sell into markets with scarcity without having to suffer any disruption in their own feedstock supplies.
According to U.S. Energy Information Administration, refinery utilization in the United States reached nearly 92% during last month. Gulf Coast usage averaged above 95% compared to around 90% a year ago. This compares to a seasonal average for the Gulf Coast of 82% over the past five years.
Rystad Energy, a consultancy, said that Asian refinery utilization has fallen to a low-to-mid-?80% range following slashings in March and April.
EXPORT MARGIN BOOST
Ship-tracking data revealed that U.S. refined product exports reached a new record in March. Exports have surged, boosting refining margins following recent quarters of global oversupply.
As refiners are receiving better prices overseas, domestic fuel prices will rise. This is despite the fact that U.S. gasoline prices and diesel prices have been trending towards record highs.
This phenomenon is most evident in the diesel and jet fuel market, which has been most affected by the Iran?war. The Middle East is the main supplier of fuels and high yield crude grades.
U.S. ultra low sulfur diesel futures traded at a premium of over $72 per barril to U.S. West Texas intermediate crude futures. This was compared to a premium of about $40 prior to the Iran War.
U.S. gasoline futures, on the other hand, were near $26 above crude oil, up from $18 before the war.
Alex Hodes of StoneX, the director of energy markets strategy, said that "Strength on global diesel markets will?expectedly pull barrels out of the U.S. Gulf Coast."
INSULATION LIMITS
The U.S. refineries are still not immune from rising crude prices as a stronger global demand raises the price of feedstock.
The spot premiums on West Texas Intermediate crude oil have reached new highs.
The price of WTI Midland crude oil for North Asia was $30-40 per barrel more than benchmarks in late March. In Europe, the bids have reached a record high near $15 per barrel.
Market participants reported that Asian refiners also compete for South American crude barrels, which?had historically flown to the U.S.
Phillips 66 announced on Monday that the rising price of commodities led to a loss of $900 million before tax in the first quarter.
Phillips 66's hedges are less valuable because oil prices have risen. They'll make a profit as they sell more refined products in a market where product prices are high," Krimmel said.
(source: Reuters)