Latest News

US Defense Agency's push to stockpile Cobalt is paused as the price soars

A DLA spokesperson said on Thursday that the U.S. Defense Logistics Agency intends to continue purchasing cobalt as part of the National Defense Stockpile, but it is reassessing the strategy. There is no set date for reissuing this tender.

The agency will likely pay more for any purchases of cobalt, as the prices have risen by 50% since the initial tender in August.

The DLA has not stockpiled cobalt in over 30 years. Cobalt is essential to the United States' national security and industrial strength as global competition for strategic minerals increases.

The U.S. also wants to reduce its reliance on China. China dominates the processing of metals used in missiles, aerospace components, magnets for communications and radars and guidance systems.

DLA is currently reviewing its cobalt acquisition strategy. DLA's spokesperson confirmed that the requirement was still valid and the agency still intended to buy the material for its National Defense Stockpile. The agency has not set a date to reissue the solicitation.

The original tender announced on August 19, with offers due to be submitted by August 29, went through several changes before being cancelled in October. Cobalt is currently priced at $24 per lb, or $52,910 per metric ton. This compares to $16 alb, or $35,275 for a ton back in August. Since February, when exports were banned by the top producer Democratic Republic of Congo, prices have been rising. Congo has since implemented quotas but producers still wait for approval from the government to resume exports.

In its original offer, the agency detailed their plans to buy 16.49 million pounds or 7,480 tons of cobalt over a period of five years for the National Defense Stockpile.

The initial offer was only from three companies: Vale's Port Colborne, Long Harbour and Sumitomo metal mining plants in Canada; Glencore's Nikkelverk operations in Norway; and Japan's Sumitomo.

Sources in the cobalt industry say that the DLA wanted companies to commit to a fixed price for the five-year period, which didn't take into account the possibility of price fluctuations. This could lead to producers suffering losses. (Reporting and editing by Kirovan Donovan; reporting by Pratima Dasai)

(source: Reuters)