Latest News

McGeever: The 2007 subprime credit warnings are echoed in the alarms of private lenders.

Each financial market crisis differs, but they all rhyme. Parallels are emerging between the 'tremors' now rippling across private credit and the subprime housing in the U.S. that led to 2007-09 Global Financial Crisis.

It's not to say that a replay of the historic crash is imminent. There is a growing danger that the increasing stress in the private credit market - i.e., the lack of liquidity, the opaque pricing and the soaring redemptions – could spill?over into the public markets.

BlackRock, with its $14 trillion in assets under management, announced?on? Friday that it had limited withdrawals after an influx of redemption requests. Blackstone, an alternative asset manager, had announced a few days prior that it raised the redemption limit on its BCRED private-credit fund in order to meet record withdrawals.

These alarms are a result of a similar incident at Blue Owl, a smaller alternative asset manager, last month. Also, the bankruptcy of U.S. auto parts supplier First Brands, and Tricolor, formerly based in California, prompted Jamie Dimon, CEO at JPMorgan Chase, to say: "When you find one cockroach there will be more."

Investors who have a sense for history or were around during the 2000s may find this all a little familiar. BNP Paribas and Bear Stearns blocked withdrawals from U.S. Subprime Funds in 2007 or warned of their problems. This small risk grew into a global financial crisis.

The GFC did not?fully explode' until September 2008, when U.S. officials allowed Lehman Brothers go bankrupt. The crisis was building steadily over the past 18 months. Investors were alerted by the tremors in those subprime funds.

It is likely that the?reason for not allowing investors to access their money today will be similar to 2007's justifications: the value of the assets has probably dropped significantly and they would have to be sold to make up the required cash; the manager may be afraid to trigger a fire-sale in other assets to raise the needed cash; or the fund might be struggling to sell illiquid assets. It could be all three.

It is difficult to know what private credit assets are worth today because the market is opaque and illiquid. Price discovery is often lost, and the bearish assumptions win.

A similarity to subprime of 2007 is the belief that private credit, and more generally private markets, do not pose a risk systemic stability. We all know that this was wishful thinking at the time.

SUBPREME RHYME, DO NOT REPEAT

This time, is it different?

If we look at sheer size, probably. According to Investec, the mortgage-backed securities, which were the cause of the GFC in 2007, were worth $7.2 trillion, or 5% of all global securities. Private credit is currently worth $2 trillion. This represents less than 1% all global securities.

Unlike subprime credit in 2007, private lending is not as tightly regulated today, at least compared to traditional banks, so its true impact is difficult to determine.

Even mom-and-pop investors have become more active. According to Investec, retail investors will hold 16.6% of private credit funds by the end of 2024. This is up from just 5.5% at the beginning of 2020.

Fitch Ratings, a credit rating agency, said last week that private credit default rates will reach a new record of 9.2% by 2025. This is up from the previous high of 8.1% set in 2024.

Unsettlingly, none of these defaults included software companies. These firms have become major private lenders. Fears of disruption from artificial intelligence have impacted the software sector this year, causing shares in Blackstone, KKR, and Apollo to drop by up to 45%.

Private credit appears to have a skewed risk profile. The?U.S. The?U.S. economy is in a precarious position, with a shaky job market, the aftermath of the Middle East war, wild volatility on oil markets, and the threat of "stagflation" in modern times.

The consensus is that the fundamentals of the economy are strong and private credit is not large or integrated enough to sabotage GDP growth or asset markets. Barclays strategists note that private credit problems are present, but not large enough to send the U.S. economy into recession.

This is how subprime mortgages were viewed in 2007!

When the liquidity wave 'goes out', you can see who has been swimming naked. Recent events on the private credit markets suggest that more funds could be exposed soon.

You like this column? Check out Open Interest, your new essential source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X.

Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.

(source: Reuters)