Latest News

Mike Dolan: ROI-AI frenzy also fuels inflation heat

Iran's energy boom may mask a larger inflation concern. AI prices are rising, and this boom will outlast any Gulf hiatus.

Not least the major central banks are watching the crude price fluctuations around the Iran conflict to see how it will affect the cost of living. The AI investment frenzy has also been fueling a flurry of factory activity, a rise in construction, and a possible increase in prices.

The massive business investment expenditure is expected to reach trillions of dollars in the future. Already, it is affecting company earnings, stock prices and projections, as well the aggregate GDP. Direct effects on consumer price are also closely examined.

AI is a topic that has generated a lot of concern, mainly because of its potential deflationary impact and long-term effects on employment. Few have focused on the inflationary pressure that is likely to come first.

The Federal Reserve published a detailed paper last month co-authored by Stephen Miran. It highlights one area in which the AI boom could already be driving up consumer prices.

The Fed's preferred inflation gauge for personal consumption expenditures, or PCEs, showed a dramatic rise in "Computer Software and Accessories". This led to some remarkable readings.

The category is relatively low in the "overall basket of consumer prices", but it has seen an unprecedented increase between November and the end of March.

Software accounted for more than half of this increase (2.8 percentage points) and the core goods component, which is the PCE's main component. It says that the contribution was more than nine standard errors above historical averages.

This was due in part to a 70 percent increase in the number of flash drives or memory sticks during a time when South Korea experienced a memory chip shortage as a result of massive chip demand around the global data center construction.

The paper argues then that the prices recorded in statistics may be misleading. They are unable to keep up with rapid technological developments and quality upgrades and could even be imputed incorrectly.

PCE is calculated by using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as inputs. A mismatch between PCE and CPI may be responsible for up to a quarter the large gain. With other measurement errors combined, the gain could be overstated by up to 50%.

HEAT AND COOL

These pressures are not dismissed by everyone as mere statistical noise.

The price increases are real, regardless of the method. It's not even worth considering the ripple effect of AI-driven costs on other chip-intensive products from energy to autos.

In a Monday note, Deutsche Bank strategist George Saravelos stated that "the AI Capex Boom" is inflationary. "There are no convincing evidences of an impact on labor markets, but there is a lot evidence for demand-side inflation." AI is pushing rates upwards, not down.

Morgan Stanley has a different baseline and is more sanguine about U.S. Inflation than the market, which has become increasingly hawkish.

The bank's alternative scenarios also indicate that AI-related pressures on prices could lead to a more aggressive price increase, such as a "combination" of AI-related pressures in categories like semiconductors, chips, memory and software.

Morgan Stanley has also suggested that AI "animal spirit" could tighten up the labor market, as the economy grows.

If this scenario occurs, the Fed may decide to consider a rate hike of up to 100 basis points. Morgan Stanley places the probability at 15%.

There are a lot more "ifs" than "buts", in these alternative scenarios.

The consensus is based on some questionable assumptions.

The AI debate is increasingly focused on the cost of AI itself. A growing emphasis has been placed on tracking AI tokens that measure this cost and could be used to re-price related contracts in the future.

If the costs of AI are higher than what is currently believed, this could have a number of effects: the costs may be passed on to products, recovered by reducing jobs, or AI use might simply be stifled.

The public and policymakers are at risk of a scenario that is similar to the Iran-related shock in terms of energy prices: the inflation will spike for a long time, only to reverse itself when demand destruction sets in, with job losses.

Wei Yao, chief economist at Societe Generale for the global region, called it "the convexity" of "central bank tightening". He applied it to Iran and oil but could also extend to AI-related fallout.

What happens when you get a cold followed by heat?

The opinions expressed are those of Mike Dolan a columnist at. This column is great! Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.

(source: Reuters)