Latest News
-
Deepsea Mira Spuds Third Well in Orange Basin License off Nambia
Oil and gas firm Rhino Resources and its partners have spudded the Volans-1X exploration well in PEL85 license, offshore Namibia, using Odfjell Drilling-managed Deepsea Mira semi-submersible rig.Drilled by the Deepsea Mira in water depths of around 1,200 meters, the Volans-1X well aims to test a new play fairway that could unlock significant development potential and strengthen Namibia’s energy future.Rhino Resources is the operator of the PEL85 license, holding 42.5% interest, with partners Azule Energy, a joint venture between Eni and BP, with 42.5% stake, National Petroleum Corporation of Namibia (NAMCOR) with 10%, and Korres Investments with 5% interests.The Volans-1X is the third successive well to be drilled on PEL85 license by Rhino and its partners.“With the Volans-1X exploration well Rhino and our partners are strategically advancing our understanding of PEL 85's potential. Once again, we’re proud to emphasize our commitment to local upliftment through the execution of another well in Namibia with all associated construction services and equipment uniquely sourced in-country.“Our focus remains on safely delivering a third consecutive well, with an emphasis on operational excellence and environmental stewardship,” said Travis Smithard, Rhino’s CEO.Built in 2019, the Deepsea Mira is a sixth generation dynamically positioned/anchor-moored semi-submersible drilling rig of Moss Maritime CS60E design. It is designed to operate in both benign and harsh environments, with a maximum operational water depth of 3000 meters.The drilling rig is owned by Northern Ocean and managed by the Norwegian drilling firm Odfjell Drilling.
-
US: Rwanda and Congo agree on outline of economic integration framework in peace deal
According to the U.S. State Department the U.S. State Department reported that the U.S. State Department and the U.S. State Department announced on Friday an outline of the regional economic integration frame work. The two countries are taking steps towards implementing the peace agreement signed last month in Washington. The framework includes elements on energy, infrastructures, mineral supply chains and national parks, as well as public health. In June, Rwanda and Congo signed an agreement in Washington, DC, at the talks hosted by President Donald Trump. The deal aims to end fighting that has claimed thousands of lives and to attract Western investment worth billions of dollars to a region with tantalum and gold deposits, as well as copper, lithium, and cobalt. The agreement stated that Kinshasa, Kigali and the other parties to the agreement agreed to launch an economic integration framework for the region within 90 days. Sources familiar with the issue said that a draft framework had been approved and now there will be a period of input to gather feedback from the civil society and private sector before the final version is released. The White House is planning to sign the framework at a summit of head of state. The source stated that no date had been set for the meeting. According to a copy of the statement seen by, Rwanda and Congo stated that each country had "full sovereign control" of the exploitation and processing of their natural resources, and acknowledged the importance of developing the mineral processing and transformation capability within each country. Kinshasa sees the looting of its mineral resources as the key factor in the conflict between their forces and the Rwanda-backed M23 M23 rebels of eastern Congo. In May, it was reported that Congolese minerals, such as tungsten tantalum, and tin which Kinshasa accuses the neighbouring Rwanda for illegally exploiting. exported legitimately Sources claim that the U.S. is negotiating a deal to send the shipments to Rwanda to be processed. According to the joint statement, the two countries have committed themselves to making sure that the minerals trade does not provide funding for armed groups, to creating a world class industrial mining sector in this region and to improving cross-border interoperability of mineral supply chains. The two countries also agreed to link new infrastructure with the U.S.-backed Lobito Corridor to demonstrate Washington's desire to gain greater access to resources and counter China. The Ruzizi hydropower project, and the Lake Kivu methane extraction were the only projects specifically mentioned in the U.S. statement despite the emphasis placed by the U.S. on critical minerals. The countries stated that they would prioritize funding for Ruzizi, and work together in order to sustainably exploit methane gas.
-
Meta shares AI infrastructure costs with $2 billion in asset sales
Meta Platforms continues to push forward with its efforts to find outside partners who can help fund the massive infrastructure required to power artificial intelligent. In a Thursday filing, Meta Platforms revealed plans to sell $2 billion worth of data center assets to achieve this strategy. This strategy is part of a wider shift in the tech giants' approach to growth. They are no longer self-funding their own growth, but instead they have been forced to deal with the rising cost of data centers and energy for generative AI. The social media giant announced earlier this week it was looking into ways to collaborate with financial partners in order to co-develop its massive capital expenditure for next year. Meta's Chief Financial Officer Susan Li stated on Wednesday during a conference call following the company's earnings. Li stated that while the company will continue to fund a large portion of its capital expenditures internally, certain projects may attract "significant" external financing and provide more flexibility as infrastructure needs change over time. She said that the company had no finalized transactions she could announce. Meta's quarterly report, however, indicates that plans are becoming more concrete. In its quarterly filing on Thursday, Meta said it had approved a plan in June to dispose of certain data center assets and reclassified $2.04 billion worth of land and construction-in-progress as "held-for-sale". The assets would be transferred to a third-party within the next 12 months to co-develop data centers. Meta did not report a loss for the reclassification. The assets are valued at the lower value of the carrying amount or the fair value less the costs to sell. According to the filing, total assets held for sale stood at $3.26billion as of June 30. Meta declined to comment on this article. Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, has announced plans to invest hundreds billions of dollars in building "superclusters", or AI data centers for superintelligence. He said that "just one of these covers an important part of Manhattan's footprint." Instagram and WhatsApp's owner raised its forecast for annual capital expenditures by $2 billion on Wednesday, from $66 billion to $75 billion. It reported stronger-than-expected ad sales, boosted by AI-driven improvements to targeting and content delivery. The executives said that these gains helped offset the rising costs of infrastructure associated with its long-term AI initiative. (Reporting and editing by Sayantani ghosh and Marguerita choy in New York)
-
Sources say that Trump is looking to bring Azerbaijan and Central Asian nations under the Abraham Accords.
Five sources familiar with the situation say that the Trump administration is in active discussions with Azerbaijan about the possibility of bringing this nation and other Central Asian allies to the Abraham Accords. The goal is to strengthen their current ties with Israel. In the Abraham Accords signed in 2020 and 2021, during Trump's initial term, four Muslim majority countries agreed to normalize their diplomatic relations with Israel, after U.S. mediated. Azerbaijan, and all countries in Central Asia have had long-standing relations with Israel. Therefore, an expansion of the Abraham Accords to include these countries would be largely symbolic. It would focus on strengthening ties such as trade and military collaboration, according to the sources who requested anonymity for private conversations. This expansion would show Trump's willingness to accept pacts less ambitious than the administration's goal of convincing regional giant Saudi Arabia to restore relations with Israel as war rages on in Gaza. The Kingdom has said repeatedly that it will not recognize Israel until Israel acknowledges a Palestinian State. The Arabs are furious over the escalating death toll and the starvation of Gaza due to Israel's military actions and blockade of aid. This has complicated efforts to include more Muslim majority countries in the Abraham Accords. Global anger has been sparked by the war in Gaza where, according to local authorities, over 60,000 people, including tens and thousands of women, children, have died. Canada, France and United Kingdom announced in recent days plans to recognize an independent Palestine. Azerbaijan and Armenia's conflict is another key sticking point, as the Trump administration views a peace agreement between the two Caucasus countries as a condition for joining the Abraham Accords. Sources said that while Trump officials had publicly floated a number of potential participants in the accords the Azerbaijan talks were among the most structured. Two sources said a deal might be achieved within months, or even weeks. Steve Witkoff was the special envoy of Trump for peace missions. He traveled to Baku in Azerbaijan to meet President Ilham Aliyev. Three sources claim that Aryeh lightstone, a Witkoff aide who is a major player in the Abraham Accords discussion, met Aliyev in the spring to discuss this issue. Sources said that as part of the discussion, Azerbaijani representatives had contacted officials from Central Asian nations including Kazakhstan to gauge their interest for a broader Abraham Accords extension. Sources said that it was unclear which other Central Asian countries were contacted, including Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan Turkmenistan Tajikistan Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. When asked to comment, the State Department did not mention specific countries but stated that expanding the accords was one of Trump's key goals. A U.S. official said, "We're working to get more nations to join." The Azerbaijani Government declined to comment. Requests for comment were not answered by the White House, Israel's foreign ministry or the Kazakhstani Embassy in Washington. The Abraham Accords, which Israel signed in the past, will not be affected by any new agreements. OBSTACLES REMAINS Original Abraham Accords - signed between Israel, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan – were centered around restoration of ties. The second round of the expansion seems to be evolving into a wider mechanism to expand U.S. soft power and Israeli hard power. Azerbaijan, sandwiched between Russia and Iran in the north, and Central Asia and Europe to the south is a vital link for trade between the two regions. Oil and gas are abundant in Central Asia and the Caucasus, which has led to a competition between major powers for influence. Extending the accords to countries that have diplomatic relations with Israel could also be a way to give a symbolic win to a President who is known for praising even small victories. Two sources describe the Central Asia discussions as embryonic, but the Azerbaijan discussions as fairly advanced. There are still challenges and no guarantee that a deal can be reached. This is especially true given the slow progress of talks between Armenian and Azerbaijan. Both countries gained independence from the Soviet Union, in 1991. Since the late 1980s, when Nagorno Karabakh, an Azerbaijani area with a majority ethnic Armenian population, broke away from Azerbaijan, they have been at odds. Azerbaijan will retake Karabakh in 2023. This will cause 100,000 ethnic Armenians fleeing to Armenia. Since then, both sides have said that they would like to sign a peace treaty to end the conflict. The U.S. and Armenia have strong ties, but the Trump administration does not want to upset the authorities in Yerevan. Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have both argued for a near-term peace between the two nations. Trump said to reporters in early July, "Armenia and Azerbaijan...we worked magic there." It's close." (Reporting and editing by Humeyra Pauk and Deepa Babyington; Additional reporting and editing by Steve Holland in Washington and Humeyra and Humeyra in Jerusalem, Nailia Bagirova and Nailia Rose in Baku)
-
BlackRock fails to dismiss Texas climate conspiracy claims
A U.S. Judge on Friday rejected in large part a request from top asset managers, including BlackRock, to dismiss a suit filed by Texas and twelve other Republican-led States that claimed the companies had violated antitrust laws through climate activism which reduced coal production and increased energy prices. U.S. district judge Jeremy Kernodle, in Tyler, Texas, agreed to dismiss only three of the 21 count in the states' suit, which also names institutional investors State Street, Vanguard, and others. This is one of the most high-profile lawsuits aimed at promoting environmental, social, and governance goals. Requests for comment from the companies were not immediately responded to by representatives. Kernodle was appointed by Donald Trump and his ruling means that states can continue with their claims against asset managers for violating U.S. Antitrust Law by joining Climate Action 100+ an investor initiative to take actions to combat climate changes, as well as using their shareholder advocacy to further its goals. The companies deny wrongdoing, and have called the case "half baked." The theories of the states were supported by Trump's antitrust enforcers, who are now at the U.S. Department of Justice (DJ) and Federal Trade Commission. The result of the case could have major implications on how companies that together manage $27 trillion in passive funds and holdings approach their investments. BlackRock, the fund firm that is suing the plaintiffs, has stated that the plaintiffs could seek a remedy by asking the fund firms not to hold coal companies. This would likely increase energy prices and harm companies' access capital. Reporting by David Shepardson and Jody Godoy, both in Washington; editing by David Holmes
-
Chevron CEO: Exports of Venezuelan crude oil to resume in this month
The chief executive of U.S. oil company Chevron said that the company expects to resume its exports to the U.S. this month. This follows a limited license issued by the U.S. Treasury Department this week to operate in Venezuela and to do oil swaps. Mike Wirth, CEO of Chevron, said that exports would begin with "a limited amount" and that he did not expect them to have an impact on the third-quarter results. Chevron has not exported Venezuelan oil since April when the state-owned PDVSA cancelled cargoes scheduled for its joint venture partner due to payment issues related to U.S. sanctioned against Venezuela. In March, the U.S. administration of President Donald Trump revoked Chevron's license that was granted under former president Joe Biden. Trump's administration gave Chevron, PDVSA and some of its partners until the end of May to complete transactions. Washington reinstated licenses last month after a successful prisoner exchange with Venezuela. The U.S. Congress urged the reinstatement of licenses in order to stop Venezuelan barrels going to China. According to vessel movement data, Chevron had exported around 250,000 barrels of Venezuelan crude per day in the first three months before the licenses were cancelled. This was 29% of Venezuela's total exports. According to U.S. officials and sources, the new authorization is similar in nature to that of Biden's license but prohibits payment to Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro’s administration using any currency. Chevron and the cash-strapped PDVSA have been in negotiations since Washington approved the license. Sources said that the agreement is likely to include payment of mandatory taxes and royalties to Venezuela, either in kind or by way of oil swaps where Chevron supplies Venezuela with diluents. Sheila Dang (Reporting, Marianna Pararaga and David Gregorio).
-
Sources say that despite the export ban, Russia may face gasoline shortages.
Sources said that despite the export ban, Russia may face gasoline shortages this August due to low stocks at home, a peak in seasonal demand, and repairs being done by domestic refineries. The ban was imposed Monday, and is intended to last through August 31. Its purpose is to stabilize the Russian market and avoid socially sensitive increases in motor fuel prices. Traders say that it is unlikely to be enough to bring the market back to equilibrium, since gasoline export volumes are much smaller than the domestic consumption. They also claim that diverting the fuel to the local market will not satisfy the demand. The oil companies expect state regulators will force them to sell more refined products in the domestic market and to delay planned plant maintenance. The Russian Energy Ministry did not immediately respond to a comment request sent on Friday after hours of business. According to participants in the market, this year, private retail networks did not create enough fuel reserves to meet summer's high demand. This was due to an increase in interest rates of 20%, which made borrowing from banks for fuel purchases in advance to be too expensive. "At the moment, gasoline production has reached a normal summer level. Sales are also in line with expectations. Private traders are short of stocks," said a source from a large oil firm. Sources at gas retailers say that frequent flight delays in Russian airports also lead to higher gasoline consumption as travellers switch from their cars. Market participants and industry analysts believe that the shortage of gasoline is likely to persist until September. Prices may fall in October when local refineries complete repairs while demand drops off its seasonal peak. (Reporting and Editing by David Holmes).
-
Trump tariffs spark 'deep concern' among Brazil chemical firms
A Brazilian association of chemical companies, which includes large U.S. companies like ExxonMobil, Dow Chemical, and ExxonMobil, has expressed "deep concerns" about a U.S. Executive Order that raised tariffs on Brazilian imports to 50%. Abiquim, in a Friday statement, said that the Brazilian chemical industry is inextricably linked with the United States. The relationship was marked by "integration," and "cross investments." Andre Cordeiro said that the impact on Brazilian chemical exports would be significant, as it would compromise supply chains, jobs and investments both in Brazil and in the U.S. Abiquim reported that more than 20 of the chemical companies in Brazil are owned by Americans. Abiquim, along with the American Chemistry Council, submitted a joint declaration to the Brazilian and United States governments "requesting action to prevent damage to integration and resilience in chemical supply chains. The statement focused on trade facilitation and regulatory collaboration." According to Abiquim, Brazil exported $2.4 billion worth of chemical products to America last year. This sector has a deficit of almost $8 billion. The executive order of President Donald Trump from July 30, affects approximately $1 billion annually in Brazilian chemical exports into the U.S. while only exempting five products that represent $697 million sales to the U.S. by 2024. Abiquim also said that its companies will suffer more losses as the chemical products are used in many industries, including furniture, textiles and leather goods. Some of these industries have already experienced cancellation of orders from the United States due to this new tariff. Abiquim announced last week that its own sector was already facing contract cancellations due to Trump's tariffs. (Reporting and editing by Andrea Ricci; Ana Mano)
Sources say that Putin's peace demands include a stop to NATO expansion.
According to three Russian sources familiar with the negotiations, President Vladimir Putin has set conditions to end the war in Ukraine. These include that Western leaders commit in writing to stop expanding NATO eastwards as well as lifting a portion of sanctions against Russia. Donald Trump, the U.S. president, has said repeatedly that he wants the European conflict to be over. He has also shown growing frustration towards Putin in recent weeks. On Tuesday he warned the Russian leader 'playing with fire' by refusing ceasefire talks with Kyiv while his forces were making gains on the battlefield. Putin told Trump that after a two-hour conversation last week, he agreed to work on a document with Ukraine that would outline the terms of a peace agreement, including when a ceasefire will be implemented. Russia is drafting their version of the document and has no idea how long it will take.
Kyiv, as well as European governments, have accused Moscow for stalling its troops' advance in the east Ukraine.
One senior Russian source, speaking on condition of anonymity and with intimate knowledge of the Kremlin's thinking, said that Putin is willing to make peace at any cost.
Three Russian sources have said that Putin wants an "written" commitment from major Western powers to not expand the U.S. led NATO alliance eastwards. This is a shorthand way of formally excluding Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova and other former Soviet Republics. The three sources also said that Russia wants Ukraine to remain neutral, certain Western sanctions lifted, a solution for the frozen Russian assets in the west, and protection of Russian speakers in Ukraine.
First source: If Putin is unable, on his terms, to achieve a peaceful settlement, he'll try to demonstrate to the Ukrainians and Europeans, through military victories, that "peace tomorrow would be even more painful".
The Kremlin has not responded to a request for a comment about'reporting. Putin and Russian officials repeatedly stated that any peace agreement must address the "root cause" of the conflict. This is Russian shorthand for NATO expansion and Western support for Ukraine. Kyiv repeatedly stated that Russia shouldn't be given veto rights over Ukraine's aspirations to become a member of the NATO alliance. Ukraine wants the West to provide a solid security guarantee that is backed up by teeth in order to deter future Russian attacks. The administration of President Volodymyr Zelenskiy did not reply to a comment request. NATO has said in the past that it would not change its policy of "open doors" just because Moscow demanded it. The 32-member alliance's spokesperson did not answer any questions.
Putin sent tens-of-thousands of troops to Ukraine in February 2022, after eight years fighting between separatists backed by Russia and Ukrainian troops in the east of Ukraine.
Russia controls less than one fifth of Ukraine. The Russian advance has accelerated in the last year. However, both Russia and Ukraine are paying a heavy price for the war.
In January, it was reported that Putin had become increasingly concerned about the economic distortions of Russia's wartime economies. This is due to labour shortages as well as high interest rates implemented in order to combat inflation. Oil, which is the foundation of Russia's economic system, has been steadily declining in price this year. Trump, who boasts of his friendly relationship with Putin, and believes that the Russian leader is seeking peace, warned Washington it could impose additional sanctions if Moscow delayed efforts to reach a settlement. Trump suggested on social media that Putin was "absolutely CRAZY", for unleashing an aerial attack against Ukraine last week.
First, the source stated that Putin would move further into Ukraine in the event he saw an opportunity to do so on the battlefield. The Kremlin also believed that Russia could continue fighting for many years despite the economic and political pressures imposed by Western countries. Second source: Putin is less willing to compromise with regards to territory, and is sticking to his public position that he wants to claim the entire four regions of eastern Ukraine.
The second source stated that Putin has reaffirmed his position on the issue of territory.
NATO Enlargement As Trump and Putin battled in public about the prospects for peace in Ukraine could not tell if the intensification of war and the hardening of positions signaled a determination to reach an agreement or a collapse of talks.
In June of last year, Putin laid out his first terms for an end to the conflict immediately: Ukraine must abandon its NATO ambitions and remove all its troops from four Ukrainian regions that are claimed by Russia and largely controlled by them.
Russia controls more than 70% Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia regions, as well as almost all of Luhansk. Russia also controls a small part of Kharkiv, Sumy and Kherson regions and threatens Dnipropetrovsk.
The former U.S. president Joe Biden and Western European leaders, as well as Ukraine, have repeatedly called the invasion an imperialistic land grab. They also vowed that they would defeat Russian forces.
Putin sees the war in the context of the watershed moment for Moscow's relationship with the West, which he claims humiliated Russia in 1991 after the Soviet Union collapsed by expanding NATO and encroaching upon what he believes to be Moscow's sphere.
In 2008, NATO leaders in Bucharest agreed that Ukraine and Georgia will one day be members. In 2019, Ukraine amended its constitution to commit to full membership in NATO and the European Union. Trump said that the U.S.'s previous support for Ukraine’s NATO membership bid caused the war and indicated that Ukraine would not be granted membership. The U.S. State Department has not responded to a comment request on this story.
Putin, who became the Kremlin's top official in 1999, has returned to NATO enlargement several times, including his most detailed remarks on a possible peaceful future in 2024. Just two months prior to the Russian invasion in 2021, Moscow presented a draft of an agreement with NATO that, under Article 6 would bind NATO "to refrain from any further expansion of NATO, which includes the accession of Ukraine and other States." At the time, U.S. diplomats and NATO officials said that Russia had no veto over the expansion of the alliance. Russia wants to see a written commitment from NATO because Putin believes that the United States misled Moscow after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 when U.S. Secretary James Baker told Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, in 1990, that NATO wouldn't expand eastward.
William J. Burns, the former director of Central Intelligence Agency, said that there was a verbal agreement, but it never became formalized. It was also made before the fall of the Soviet Union. NATO, which was founded in 1949 as a means of providing security against the Soviet Union says that it does not pose a threat to Russia, even though the 2022 assessment on peace and security within the Euro-Atlantic region identified Russia as the "most significant and direct danger".
Finland joined NATO in 2023 after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in that same year. Sweden followed in 2024. Western European leaders have said repeatedly that if Russia won the Ukraine war it could attack NATO one day - which would trigger a global war. Russia has dismissed such claims as scaremongering but also warned that the conflict in Ukraine could escalate. (Reporting in Moscow; Editing by Daniel Flynn).
(source: Reuters)