Latest News
-
The weekly copper price is up on the back of mine supply concerns and China demand
Copper prices were on track to gain a weekly % of?1.5% this Friday. This was due to concerns about mine supply disruptions and signs of active demand from?China, the top consumer. By 0948 GMT, the benchmark three-month price of copper at the London Metal Exchange had risen by 1.2% to $14,473.50 per metric tonne. Yangshan Copper Premium This week, the price of copper in China reached its highest level in four years, after the country returned from its week-long vacation. The Shanghai Futures Exchange monitors copper inventories in warehouses. The end-of-week stock level was 58,744 tonnes, an increase of 20,000 tons over the previous week. Exchange data revealed that copper stocks at the LME registered warehouses fell to a six-week-low of 233.025 tons, after daily outflows totaling 4,700?tons. This was mainly due to warehouses in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Since 2025, copper prices have been supported by the constant transfers of metal to Comex warehouses, especially in the last six months. This is due to uncertainty about potential US import tariffs for refined copper. Comex inventories are at a record high of 711 609 tons. Cash copper contracts ended Thursday with a $97 per ton premium over the three-month contract. Morgan Stanley stated in a report that "any slowdown in US stocks could make the markets feel looser. But China's demand has been resilient, and supply is experiencing significant disruptions." The union representing Antofagasta’s?Centinela mine in Chile has said that the strike will?begin affecting output in November. Antofagasta initially downplayed its impact, but this situation has increased the risk of disruptions at other mines. Aluminium and lead, among other LME metals, rose by 1.1% each to $3,085 a ton and $1,880 per ton. Zinc rose 1.7% to $3.781.50. Tin increased 2.1% to $52,305. Nickel climbed 1.2%, to $15,730.
-
AI-related companies drive the majority of third-quarter US earnings increases
US companies will likely deliver a third-quarter earnings surge, and AI-related players, like the stock market rally, are driving most of these gains. Investors are excited about the hyper-growth of AI companies, but they are also concerned about the future of the share price and how long this trend will continue. According to Tajinder dhillon, LSEG’s head of earnings research and equity, analysts expect S&P500 earnings to increase by 31% in the third quarter. Two-thirds will come from the tech sector, including AI giants Alphabet and Amazon.com, as well as Meta Platforms. The S&P 500 reached a new record this week, ahead of earnings season. This is expected to begin unofficially next?week when banks such as JPMorgan Chase or Goldman Sachs report their results. "It is all AI, and to a lesser degree, energy and material, but this is because of geopolitics,"?Sameer samana, the head of global equity and real assets at Wells Fargo Investment Institute. It wouldn't be surprising if 70-80% growth could be attributed tech and AI. The US oil price has risen by roughly 30% during the third quarter due to the ongoing US-Israeli conflict with Iran. Samana pointed out that the?earnings estimates for the third-quarter are among the lowest. Strategists are unsure if the third-quarter growth in earnings can match the explosive growth seen in the second quarter. Most companies beat analyst's estimates and this is likely to continue in the third quarter. LSEG data shows that the S&P 500's earnings grew by 54% in the second quarter, the highest growth since 2021. LSEG data showed that excluding mark-to-market gains from Alphabet and Amazon.com for AI-related investments the growth rate was still about 35%. This is the highest level since 2021. Anthony Saglimbene is the chief market strategist of Ameriprise Financial. He said that investors should be concerned because we're approaching "peak earnings growth" in this cycle. "A lot is this AI trade built on continuing capex spending. Every quarter, as they continue to do so, the hurdle rates and scrutiny get higher." Dhillon, based upon LSEG data, said that earnings for US semiconductor firms, which are among the largest beneficiaries of the AI boom will?have risen by about 136% compared to about 158% during the second quarter. Nick Raich is the CEO of Earnings Scout. Three months ago, we were going 150 miles per hour. Raich stated that the latest reports, including those from Micron Technology, were strong and suggested other companies continue to "reap the benefits." Micron, a chipmaker, forecasted quarterly revenue that was above expectations and said customers had boosted their commitments to its long-term supply agreements up to $32 billion. This week, Google signed a huge power deal with Constellation Energy. Investors will also be paying close attention to the impact of higher interest rates on corporate profits during this earnings season. The US bond yields are rising due to concerns over inflation, high oil prices, and debt problems elsewhere. Samana warned that heavy borrowers such as utilities are at risk.
-
Campaign group warns that the new Congress in Brazil poses a threat to environmental legislation
According to a report by the climate advocacy group Observatorio Do?Clima that found almost 70% of elected legislators have no or little interest in environmental issues, Brazil's new Congress will likely pose a greater obstacle to legislation protecting the environment after elections this month. The study examined bills, legislative initiatives, speeches, and public statements made by newly elected and reelected legislators. It concluded that 64 out of 81 senators have demonstrated a "very low" commitment to environmental issues. In the lower chamber, 345 out of 511 legislators were placed in the same category. According to the study, the Liberal Party, which is home to Flavio Bolsonaro (a right-wing senator) who will be facing President Luiz Inacio Lula in a presidential runoff later this month has the lowest environmental credentials of all major parties. Bolsonaro defeated Lula in a first round despite pollsters' predictions, but he didn't get enough votes to prevent a second ballot. The environmental commitment of all 28 senators and lower house members who were elected by the party on Sunday was rated as very low. The study also found that other right-leaning political parties, such as?Novo and Republicanos, Progressistas, and Uniao Brasil showed low support for environmental issues. Observatorio do Clima stated that environmental advocates may face a more 'challenging' political landscape if Bolsonaro, whose previous?comments about climate change caused concern, is elected President. I contacted the parties named but did not receive a response. The group said that proposals to weaken environmental protections, such as measures to reduce protected lands, allow mining on Indigenous land, and ease licensing requirements for environmental matters, could gain "traction" under the new Congress. Suely Araujo is the public policy coordinator for the group. She said, "This image shows four years of hard work by those who are focused on climate and environment issues."
-
Trump's comment that Iran can 'take out Los Angeles' was misinterpreted
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that comments he made about Iran being able to "take out" California cities were misinterpreted. He was referring instead to the need for people to tolerate higher gasoline prices. Trump made these remarks on Monday at a Nebraska political rally, where he talked about the economic sacrifices of Americans during World War II. "Remember that the 'war' is artificial, it costs a lot, but it's worth it," he said. "It is a small price to pay in order to keep the world and our country safe. They could take out an entire city. Let's?take Los Angeles out, let's?take San Diego out. It's a small price to pay and it will be over very soon." California's Democratic Leaders and some Republican colleagues quickly condemned the remarks. Trump stated in a Truth Social posting on Thursday that "a temporary increase in Gasoline prices is a small price to be paid for Iran not having a nuclear weapon." "If you want to see a huge price, can you imagine what would happen if they bombed San Diego and/or Los Angeles?" He continued by saying he loved both cities. Trump has dismissed concerns about cost of living stemming the Iran conflict in the past.
-
US to rescind methane policy against oil and gas industry
The US Environmental Protection Agency announced on Wednesday that it would be scrapping the Biden-era regulation aimed at curbing large leaks of'methane' from oil and gas operations. The move is part a broader effort by the Trump administration to reduce regulations, which it claims burden US businesses in its quest to increase fossil fuel production. "Americans should be able to afford heating their homes during the winter and filling up their cars to drive to work." The people who produce the energy cannot?do this when they are burdened by unnecessary burdens," EPA Administator Lee Zeldin stated in a press release after announcing the decision at a meeting with representatives of the oil and gas industries in New Mexico. The "super emitter program" of the EPA requires that companies react when third parties use remote sensing to report suspected methane leaks. After taking office in 2017, the Trump administration?delayed implementing this policy until next. EPA claimed that its proposal to rescind this?rule could save $45 billion a yearly. The oil and gas industry, which is a major source of methane, is responsible for the second largest?cause?of climate change?after carbon dioxide. Environmental groups have criticized the move. In a statement, Mahyar Sorour of Sierra Club's Beyond Fossil Fuels said: "This giveaway is foolish and shortsighted. It reveals to whom the Trump administration works - its political donors."
-
US seizes $3 Million in fuel shipments from Cuba as crackdown continue
The US announced on Wednesday that it had seized 90 separate shipments of biodiesel bound to Cuba, worth nearly $3 million. This is the second time this week US authorities have announced the seizure "illegal" fuel en route to Cuba. The Trump administration is continuing to choke off Cuba's energy industry, only allowing small amounts of fuel to be shipped to the private sector on the island in an effort to undercut the Cuban government. Jose Figueroa, Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Miami, told Miami reporters on Wednesday that the seized cargo was destined for Enetec, an Enetec-based state-owned fuel firm sanctioned earlier this year by the US. The authorities said that they intercepted fuel shipments at Port Everglades in south Florida and Houston before they left the US. Homeland Security reported that more than 600,000 gallons were seized. Figueroa stated that "an effort of this magnitude to undermine US sanction is not an accident." These actions are aimed at shipments that could benefit the Cuban government through a state controlled entity. Anyone who attempts to undermine US laws to fund, facilitate or profit from such an effort should be put on notice. Cuba's government didn't?comment immediately on the fuel seizure. Cuba's communist-run government has called the Trump administration's blockade of fuel on Cuba "economic war" and "illegal". The blockade has exacerbated the ongoing problems of blackouts, shortages of water and inflation on the island, pushing it towards a humanitarian catastrophe. US President Donald Trump stated openly that his goal is to overthrow Cuba's government with the?blockade & sanctions. Last week, the US Coast Guard announced that they had intercepted in September a large container vessel carrying fuel bound for Cuba. The Coast Guard said that the ship was attempting to evade authorities, and had large amounts of fuel hidden within its ballast tanks. In either case, the US has not disclosed the identities of the exporters.
-
Russia claims that Ukraine has struck two nuclear facilities at Zaporizhzhia
The head of Russia's state nuclear corporation said that despite the fact that Ukrainian drones had attacked two facilities at Zaporizhzhia, a Russian-held nuclear power plant in southeast Ukraine, there was no danger to nuclear safety. Alexei Likhachev said that a driver who was delivering food to plant workers had been killed by the drone attack. Likhachev said that a laboratory and a plant for the processing of radioactive waste were targeted. Ukraine has yet to comment on the incident. The plant's management announced on?Saturday that Ukrainian shelling in recent weeks has damaged the external power supply equipment. Electricity is currently provided by emergency diesel generators. The plant does not produce electricity, but it needs two external links for power to cool nuclear fuel. In the first few weeks of the war, which began with Moscow's invasion of its smaller neighbor in February 2022, Russia captured the?plant - Europe's biggest with six reactors. Since then, Moscow and Kyiv accuse each other regularly of military actions that compromise nuclear safety. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog has repeatedly taken action to ensure a ceasefire surrounding the plant so that repairs could be made to the lines connecting the facility to the main grid. UN monitors are at the Zaporizhzhia and three other plants in Ukraine. Maria Zakharova of the Russian Foreign Ministry wrote on her ministry's website that the West was enabling Ukrainian aggressions by not publicly condemning them. Zakharova wrote that "Kyiv has intensified its shelling of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant because Western countries have not responded appropriately to these actions, effectively facilitating new assaults." "Such an attitude toward strikes by the Ukrainian military shows the true 'value' of statements made by representatives of these nations about nuclear and physical safety at international forums."
-
The top cases in the US Supreme Court docket
US Supreme Court will hear a number of important cases in its new term, which begins Monday. These include issues like President Donald Trump's Immigration Policies, the ban on assault-style rifles, the financial responsibility of Big Oil for climate change and Republican-backed voting restriction. This is a list of some of the cases that are being argued in the current term. The term runs until the end of June. Big Oil Climate Suit ExxonMobil, Suncor Energy and Boulder officials argued on October 5, attempting to "thwart" a lawsuit filed by Boulder officials. The Justices grappled with the complex question of whether local governments should be allowed to hold oil companies responsible for harms caused by climate change. After Colorado's highest court allowed Boulder to sue them for violating state laws and seeking unspecified damages, the companies filed an appeal. Trump's administration supported the companies. The justices expressed concerns over unduly restricting the power of states to pursue litigation related to climate change, and the potential for chaos if local government across the nation were allowed to sue these corporations. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June. TRUMP'S MANDATORY DETENTION OF IMMIGRANTS The court will determine the legality Trump's policy, which subjects millions of illegal immigrants living in the US to mandatory detention while deportation proceedings are underway. Trump's policy of mass deportation includes this policy. The Supreme Court heard the Trump administration appeal of a lower-court ruling that ruled against the policy, in a case concerning a Brazilian citizen. The US administration has abandoned its long-standing interpretation of federal laws that allowed immigrants living in the US to be released under bond until their cases were heard in immigration court. Dates for the arguments have not been set yet. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June. DEPORTATIONS TO A THIRD COUNTRY BY TRUMP In December, the justices will hear arguments over the Trump administration’s policy to deport migrants to "third countries", or other nations than their home country. They won't give them the opportunity to demonstrate the harms that they might face. On September 29, the court allowed the Trump administration to continue its policy, suspending a federal judge’s ruling that deporting migrants to third-country countries was illegal. Human rights groups claim that more than 25,000 migrants were deported under this policy to 29 different countries. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June. Ban on assault-style rifles On December 2, the justices will hear arguments in a challenge against state prohibitions of 'assault style rifles. This case involves a weapon type that is often associated with mass killings. The lower courts in Cook County Illinois and Connecticut upheld the bans on powerful semiautomatic weapons such as AR-15s. Lower courts rejected arguments that these measures violated the US Constitution's Second Amendment rights to "keep and bear arms." Gun rights groups, as well as other opponents, have argued that Supreme Court precedents regarding the Second Amendment protect firearms in "common usage." The end of June is the expected date for a ruling. Voting Rights On December 8, the justices will hear arguments in a Republican led bid to reinstate voter restrictions in Arizona. This would require proof of citizenship for all voter registrants, and purge voter lists in Arizona from alleged non-US citizen voters. Republicans appealed a lower court's decision to stop certain provisions of Arizona law for violating federal voting registration laws. The Trump administration has supported key aspects of the appeal. The Arizona measure, according to critics, adds additional mandates for voting which unfairly targets Latinos and Native American voters. These groups tend to support Democratic candidates. The ruling is expected to be made by the end of June. LGBT RIGHTS On November 3, the justices will hear arguments in an appeal by the Archdiocese of Denver, and other Catholic entities, to be exempted of a Colorado program that funds preschools' nondiscrimination requirements. A lower court ruled that Colorado's program didn't violate the First Amendment rights of the Catholic plaintiffs. State funds are provided for preschools. The Catholic plaintiffs objected that the state required schools receiving funding through the program to give all children an "equal chance" to enroll in pre-school, regardless of certain characteristics. This included the sexual orientation of students and their families. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June. EPIC GAMES SUE AGAINST Apple Apple will try to avoid being found in contempt by the justices in its legal battle with Epic Games, the maker of "Fortnite". The iPhone maker had been found to be in violation of an order from a court ordering sweeping changes in its lucrative App Store as part the antitrust litigation. Apple appealed the ruling of a lower court that upheld a federal judge's decision in Oakland, California finding Apple in contempt for Epic's lawsuit against App Store fees. Dates for the arguments have not yet been announced. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June. PEPSICO TRADEMARK CASE The court will hear arguments regarding a claim by Rise Brewing, a maker of canned coffees, to hold PepsiCo responsible for an alleged trademark violation involving Pepsi’s morning energy beverage "Mtn Dew Rise." Rise Brewing appealed the ruling of a lower court that rejected the company's claim the name "Mtn Dew Rise," infringes on its trademarks, and confuses customers with its coffee brand. No date has been set for the arguments. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
Special Report-China floods world with gasoline cars that it cannot sell at home
In just a few short years, China's electric vehicle industry has captured more than half of its domestic market. This has led to a decline in sales for gasoline-powered cars from the once dominant global automakers.
Foreign players were not the only losers. Chinese automakers who had been in business for decades also saw their sales plummet and responded by flooding foreign markets with fossil fuel vehicles that they couldn't sell domestically.
While Western policymakers focused on the threat posed by China's heavily subsidized EVs and protected their markets with tariffs; U.S., European, and South African automakers are facing greater competition from China’s gas-guzzlers from Poland to South Africa, to Uruguay. According to Automobility, China's consultancy, fossil-fuel vehicles account for 76% (or more) of Chinese auto exports. Total annual shipments have increased from 1 million in 2020 to over 6.5 million likely this year. A recent examination revealed that the boom in gasoline exports was driven by the same EV policies and subsidies that destroyed the China businesses for automakers such as Volkswagen, GM, and Nissan. These policies and subsidies underwrote scores of Chinese EV manufacturers and ignited a price war. This phenomenon highlights the impact of Chinese industrial policies, as foreign companies struggle to compete with state-backed firms that are chasing Beijing's goal to dominate key sectors in China and internationally.
Industry and government data indicate that China's gasoline vehicle exports last year - without including EVs or plug-in hybrids – were enough to make the nation the largest auto-exporting country by volume. This report on the global expansion of Chinese automakers is based upon a review and analysis of auto sales data from dozens of countries, as well as interviews with over 30 people. These included executives of 11 Chinese and 2 Western automakers, distributor managers for Chinese brands, and industry researchers.
The Chinese gasoline car influx into emerging and secondary markets is a clash between Beijing's current push for electric vehicles and earlier policies that helped build China's domestic gas-vehicle sector by leveraging the technology of foreign automakers.
State-owned giants SAIC, BAIC and Dongfeng, among others, are the largest exporters. They have historically depended on joint ventures to gain engineering expertise and profits from foreign automakers. In the 1980s, Beijing forced these partnerships as a price for foreign companies to enter China. These joint ventures have seen their sales plummet in recent years, as innovative Chinese EV manufacturers, led by BYD, have risen to prominence. SAIC data shows that SAIC-GM China's annual sales fell from more 1.4 million cars to 435,000 vehicles between 2020 and 2024.
These state-owned automakers are now racking up sales on export markets that used to be the sole domain of foreign automakers, who are also their partners in China. SAIC exports, mainly of its own brands and without GM, soared to over a million dollars last year from just under 400,000 in 2020.
Jelte Vernooij is Dongfeng Central Europe's manager. He said that Dongfeng exported nearly 250,000 cars last year. This was an increase of almost four times in just five years.
Dongfeng has seen its annual global sales fall by one million vehicles, from 2020 to less than two million. This is according to company filings. Vernooij, however, is not worried about Dongfeng’s future because Beijing has backed it.
He said that the fact that we are state-owned was important. "There is no doubt that we will survive."
It's also a fact that gasoline cars sell better than EVs in markets with limited charging infrastructure, like those of Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Africa. Beijing aims for EVs and hybrids to be dominant in the world. In the meantime, Chinese automakers build overseas brands by offering customers what they want.
Chery is China's largest auto exporter. Between 2020 and 2024, its global sales soared from 730,000 to 2.6 millions vehicles. Chery - which is owned by both the state and the private sector - has increased its annual exports in the past five years by about one million units. Its sales are mainly gasoline powered vehicles, accounting for four-fifths. Five other state-owned carmakers, as well as two private automakers, Geely Motor and Great Wall Motor are also among China's top ten exporters. They sell more gasoline cars than electric vehicles.
Two of China's top ten auto exporters are exclusively focused on battery-powered cars. Tesla, the pioneer of electric cars in the United States, is one of them. BYD is the other, and it only sells EVs or plug-in hybrids. BYD has become China's second largest exporter this year, and the country's exports are now dominated by plug-in hybrids. China's gasoline vehicle exports will still exceed 4.3 millions and make up nearly two thirds of the total for this year.
Exports are essential for the growth and profitability of Chinese automakers, according to overseas managers from Chery, Dongfeng, and FAW. Giles Taylor is the global vice president of design at FAW. He believes that some rivals in China are just one product away from bankruptcy.
He said, "China is overpopulated with auto companies." It's on the verge of a dog-eats-dog situation.
Managers said that most brands focus on exporting gasoline cars, because it's easier to sell them in many regions. Nic Thomas, Changan’s European Marketing Director said: "We can fine tune our offering for each market."
The National Development and Reform Commission and other top exporters SAIC and BAIC as well as Geely and Great Wall Motor, and the government economic planner did not provide any comments for this report.
Executives from global automakers have acknowledged that China's rising rivals are a serious threat to their business, but mainly in relation to the innovative and affordable EVs they produce rather than gasoline-powered models. Toyota, Ford Nissan and Hyundai representatives did not make any comments on China's export boom.
Some of the old-timers say they are ready to fight. Alexander Seitz said that he has "no fears of the Chinese."
He said, "I respect them for being competitors." "They are welcome to join us." Volkswagen wants to export more cars made in China overseas to counter the competition from China.
A GM spokesperson referred to comments made by CEO Mary Barra in October, that the company aims "to compete with Chinese competitors" with the "right technology at the right price."
IDLE FACTORIES FUEL SURGE
The government's policies have created an excess of factory capacity for building them, which has led to the rush by Chinese automakers to export gasoline vehicles.
Bill Russo, CEO of Automobility, says that China's rapid EV expansion has idled assembly plants capable of producing 20 million gasoline powered cars per year. These unproductive overheads increase costs and force automakers to use capacity for exports.
Russo stated that "that excess capacity is being directed back to the rest of world".
AlixPartners, a consultancy, predicts that Chinese automakers will increase their annual sales outside China by 4,000,000 vehicles by 2030. This will result in them gaining large market share in South America and the Middle East. They also expect to gain significant market shares throughout Africa, Southeast Asia, South America and the Middle East. Chinese automakers will control 30% of global auto sales in five years, including expected growth in China - the world's biggest car market.
Stephen Dyer is the joint head of AlixPartners China.
Beijing's policies encouraged automakers over the past decade to build new electric vehicle plants instead of converting existing gasoline-vehicle facilities. Reports claim that local governments subsidized the boom in factory construction as they competed with each other to attract EV manufacturers, all for Beijing's economic purposes. Cities and provinces that wanted to show development financed automakers' EV factories at a low cost.
Local governments prepare the land, build the factories and allow companies to "move in" with only a suitcase. Liang Linhe is the chairman of Sany Heavy Trucks, one of China's biggest truck manufacturers.
The result is massive overcapacity. Su Bo, China’s former vice-minister of industry, urged the regulators at a March EV Conference to encourage the conversion of gasoline car factories into battery-powered models. Su Bo, China's former vice minister of industry, urged regulators to promote the conversion of gasoline-car factories into battery-powered models at a March EV conference.
He said that the declining gasoline car sales are "leaving significant capacity underutilized" and "plummeting the sector into an essential survival crisis."
The real battle in autos: Emerging markets
While EV startups were building factories in China, the legacy Chinese automakers searched for new markets for gasoline cars to maintain their underutilized plants.
In Warsaw, Poland on a sunny September day, new SUVs bearing chrome "BEIJING' logos lined up the Plaza dealership. These SUVs were powered by gasoline engines made by BAIC, an automaker owned and operated by the Beijing city government.
BAIC is one of 33 Chinese brands to have announced or launched Poland sales, with many selling exclusively or primarily gasoline-powered cars, according to company announcements. GlobalData's sales figures also show that BAIC was among the first Chinese brands in Poland. Jerzy Przadka is BAIC's Poland Manager. He said that there are so few Chinese midsized SUVs with distinguishable features, and many of them look alike, that Poles cannot tell the difference.
Marcin Slomkowski is the country manager of GAC and Geely at Jameel Motors. He called the new Chinese competitors that have entered Poland a "simple madness" and said local market expertise would be the "key to survival."
Inchcape is a global distributor of autos. Most of the contracts it has signed recently are with Chinese automakers who have entered emerging markets.
Older manufacturers are also joining the global market, as they struggle to meet Beijing's EV development mandates and maintain gasoline-car profit margins. Exports must be tailored to the market, which is usually gasoline cars in emerging economies.
Tait stated that "the model you use with China will not necessarily work in Costa Rica or Peru, Indonesia, Greece, or Indonesia." You have to accept the world for what it is and not as you would like it to be.
Even in more developed economies, Chinese brands are still a major player when it comes to fossil fuel vehicles. Chery sold almost all its cars in Australia with gasoline engines. Only recently has the company begun to offer plug-in hybrid models.
The pragmatism of China's automakers in the engine field created new fronts for their battle to gain market share with foreign competitors. Many automakers have historically concentrated their marketing and engineering efforts on the biggest or wealthiest markets, such as the United States, Europe and China.
In the developing world they focused on cheaper cars with older technology. This has left companies like Stellantis, GM, and VW vulnerable to a flood of cheap Chinese imports with better software and safety features, according to Felipe Munoz of JATO Dynamics, a research firm.
"Legacy automobile manufacturers were sleeping." "Now they are paying for it," said he. "The real fight between Chinese automakers and legacy carmakers does not take place in Europe. It is not taking place in the United States. "It's happening in emerging market countries."
At a September investor's event, Antonio Filosa (CEO of Stellantis) was asked how the company would react to Chinese competitors. He said that Stellantis, which has a market share of 24% in South America and the Middle East, would also follow this model for markets such as Africa and the Middle East, by building cars locally to suit local tastes. Stellantis declined to comment on Filosa’s recent remarks. Faced with increasing Chinese competition, GM announced in August that it would develop South American cars jointly with Hyundai to reduce costs.
CHINA'S AUTO IMPORTS GO TO RUSSIA AND MEXICO China is the world's biggest auto exporter. The United States has essentially banned Chinese brand vehicles through trade barriers aimed at safeguarding national and economic security. GlobalData estimates that Chinese automakers will likely end the year with more than 200,000 sales and a 14% share of the market south of the U.S.-Mexico border where there are few EVs sold.
Legacy brands like Fiat, Ford, and Chevrolet are losing market share. GlobalData predicts that Chevrolet Mexico sales will be 52,231 this year. This is a decrease of more than 24% from 2023. Mexico announced in September that it would increase tariffs on Chinese vehicles from 20% to 50%. The government claimed this would protect jobs, but analysts argued the move was an attempt to appease Washington. U.S. officials pressured Mexico to limit trade with China in order to prevent China from using Mexico as an "backdoor" to avoid U.S. tariffs. Analysts called the move a tactic to placate Washington.
Chinese automakers are also facing political challenges in Russia. Mexico became China's largest auto-export destination this year after Moscow increased fees on Chinese imports. GlobalData reports that Russia increased the tax after China overflowed its market. According to GlobalData, China's share grew from 21% in 2020 to 64% or approximately 900,000. These fees have slashed Chinese imports to Russia.
Requests for comments on Chinese auto imports from the governments of Russia and Mexico were not answered.
South Africa, like Russia and Mexico, has an industry at home to protect. This includes global automakers that have a large footprint in manufacturing. The government has encouraged Chinese automakers in South Africa to build factories, while threatening to impose tariffs on cheap imports.
According to JATO Dynamics, Chinese automakers controlled 16% of the South African car market during the first half. This is up from 10% a few years ago. The Chinese sold almost 30,000 gasoline cars - but only 11 electric vehicles.
GlobalData reports that Toyota had the largest South Africa sales decline among traditional automakers, with a drop of almost 15%, or 93,805 cars.
Changan, a state-owned company, is launching five new vehicles in South Africa. This includes two battery-powered models. However, the best-seller, according to Changan, will be its diesel-powered pickup truck, or "bakkie", as it's known locally.
Marinus Venter who manages Changan for Jameel Motors, said that the EV market would take longer.
CHINESE PICKUPS: A NEW FRONTIER
In Chile, there are only a few charging stations scattered along the 2,600 miles (4200 km) of mountains and seaside terrain. According to the local auto-industry association, Chinese automakers now account for almost a third of the market in Chile. GlobalData reports that their growth came at the expense for legacy brands such as Chevrolet, Nissan, and Volkswagen, which saw sales fall between 34%-45% in 2017.
Chinese brands in Chile are more likely to follow the strategy of a traditional automaker like Toyota, which has sold few EVs worldwide.
Vernooij is the Dongfeng manager for Europe. He said that Dongfeng, like other state-owned companies, is actively targeting emerging markets in order to increase sales. Dongfeng offers a wide range of vehicles in Chile, including sedans, vans, pickups, and SUVs. Vernooij stated, "We must win." If you want to be as successful as Toyota, then you can't leave any stone unturned.
According to JATO Dynamics, Chinese brands sold less than 1,000 EVs but more than 25,000 internal combustion vehicles in Chile during the first half.
Dongfeng, a long-time China-based joint venture partner of Nissan, sells a version Nissan's truck in Uruguay. The Dongfeng Rich 6 resembles a Nissan Frontier, but with a different exterior and an older Nissan V6 motor. Nissan's spokesperson confirmed that the Rich 6 was based on the Frontier, and jointly developed by both automakers.
According to Uruguay dealers, the Nissan starts at around $30,990, while the Dongfeng is priced at approximately $21,490.
Mariana Betizagasti (33), from Durazno in Uruguay, bought a Rich 6, to handle the heavy work on a farm, such as hauling feed and transporting animals, that her Renault pickup could not do.
She said that the low price sealed the deal. "You can get two Chinese trucks at the same price as one traditional brand from Uruguay."
Nissan's spokesperson refused to comment on whether Nissan makes money from its overseas sales, or the competition that Chinese automakers pose.
Nevertheless, many Chinese automakers sell their exports at prices that are higher than the ones they receive for similar models on China's fiercely competitive market.
Yan Jun, executive vice president of Jetour International and Chery's Jetour Brand, stated that Chery will maintain a price-conscious policy as the brand expands into every European country before 2027.
In an interview, he stated that "Right Now, not many automakers in China make money." "We do not want to be involved in another price war."
(source: Reuters)