Latest News

IMF: constructive US-China dialogue and reduced tensions are good for the world economy

The?International Monetary Fund stated on Thursday that they?welcome?the initial dialogue between U.S. president Donald Trump and Chinese president Xi Jinping. They added that reducing tensions and uncertainties between the two world's largest economies is good for the entire world.

When asked to comment on the initial results of the Trump-Xi Summit in Beijing, IMF spokesperson Julie Kozack said at a press briefing: "It is important that the two world's largest economies engage at the highest levels." "We certainly welcome the fact there is a constructive dialog between the two nations." Kozack said that anything that reduces trade tensions, or creates less uncertainty, is good for these two large economies and the global economy. Kozack said that due to the Middle East conflict and Iran's closing of the Strait of Hormuz which have kept crude oil above $100 per barrel the "global economy" is moving towards the middle of three scenarios that were outlined by the IMF in their?April World Economic Outlook.

IMF's "adverse scenario" assumes that the global GDP will grow by 2.5% in this year. This compares to 3.1% growth in the "reference forecast", which assumes an end to the war in 2025.

The negative scenario assumes that oil will be $100 per barrel for the entire year, but also tightening financial conditions and increasing inflation expectations.

Kozack stated that while higher energy prices may have increased expectations for short-term increases in price, the IMF believes medium-term expectations are well-anchored. She said that the financial conditions of the global economy are still "accommodative".

ASSISTANCE TALKS

IMF is continuing to discuss financial assistance with member countries who are suffering from higher energy and commodities costs because of the Middle East conflict. She did not give any specifics on countries or comment on a report that Iraq had sought financial aid.

International Monetary Fund Director Kristalina Georgeieva stated during the IMF and World Bank Spring Meetings in April that a minimum of 12 countries were expected to require assistance from both institutions totaling between $20 billion and $50 billion. The two institutions are currently consulting on how to best assist member countries.

Kozack refused to update these figures.

She added, "We're seeing that many countries actually ask us for help in the policy field." "They ask us for advice on policy." How can they respond best to shock, given their individual country's circumstances?

In April, the Fund said that member countries should not provide broad fuel subsidies because they would drain fiscal resources at a time when oil supplies are limited and increase prices. Reporting by David Lawder, Editing by Andrea Ricci

(source: Reuters)