Latest News

Senior Iranian official: European proposals at Geneva are unrealistic

Senior Iranian official: European proposals at Geneva are unrealistic

On Saturday, a senior Iranian official claimed that the proposals made by European powers during talks in Geneva on his country's nucleo programme were "unrealistic", and that it would be hard to reach an agreement if they stuck with them. On Friday, there were few signs that progress had been made after the E3 (Britain, France, Germany and the EU) and their Iranian counterpart met to try and prevent the conflict between Israel, Iran and the EU from escalating.

The Europeans' discussions and proposals in Geneva were unrealistic. "Insisting on this position will not bring Iran or Europe closer to an accord," said the senior official, speaking under condition of anonymity.

The official stated that "in any event, Iran will review European proposals in Tehran" and then present its response at the next meeting.

Both sides indicated on Friday that they are willing to continue talking, but no new date has been set.

European diplomats claimed that Friday's discussions were meant to test Tehran's willingness for a new deal on nuclear energy, despite the fact that there was no immediate prospect of Israel ceasing its attacks.

Two European diplomats, who did not reveal the details of the proposals made by either side, said that the E3 believed that Israel would not accept a ceasefire within the next few months and that Iran and the U.S. would find it difficult to resume talks.

The idea is to start a parallel negotiation track without the U.S. on a new agreement that involves tougher inspections including possibly of Iran's missile programme. However, Tehran would be allowed some nominal uranium-enrichment capability.

Emmanuel Macron, the French president, spoke on Saturday with his Iranian counterpart. He said that both sides agreed to speed up negotiations. However, he insisted that Iran must "provide every assurance" of its peaceful intentions.

The senior official rejected the possibility of discussing Iran's defensive capabilities, such as its missile program, and reiterated that the idea that zero enrichment is a dead-end.

The official stated that Iran welcomes diplomacy, but not in the shadow of war. John Irish contributed to the writing and reporting. Mark Potter and Hugh Lawson edited the article.

(source: Reuters)