Latest News
-
The weekly copper price is up on the back of mine supply concerns and China demand
Copper prices were on track to gain a weekly % of?1.5% this Friday. This was due to concerns about mine supply disruptions and signs of active demand from?China, the top consumer. By 0948 GMT, the benchmark three-month price of copper at the London Metal Exchange had risen by 1.2% to $14,473.50 per metric tonne. Yangshan Copper Premium This week, the price of copper in China reached its highest level in four years, after the country returned from its week-long vacation. The Shanghai Futures Exchange monitors copper inventories in warehouses. The end-of-week stock level was 58,744 tonnes, an increase of 20,000 tons over the previous week. Exchange data revealed that copper stocks at the LME registered warehouses fell to a six-week-low of 233.025 tons, after daily outflows totaling 4,700?tons. This was mainly due to warehouses in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Since 2025, copper prices have been supported by the constant transfers of metal to Comex warehouses, especially in the last six months. This is due to uncertainty about potential US import tariffs for refined copper. Comex inventories are at a record high of 711 609 tons. Cash copper contracts ended Thursday with a $97 per ton premium over the three-month contract. Morgan Stanley stated in a report that "any slowdown in US stocks could make the markets feel looser. But China's demand has been resilient, and supply is experiencing significant disruptions." The union representing Antofagasta’s?Centinela mine in Chile has said that the strike will?begin affecting output in November. Antofagasta initially downplayed its impact, but this situation has increased the risk of disruptions at other mines. Aluminium and lead, among other LME metals, rose by 1.1% each to $3,085 a ton and $1,880 per ton. Zinc rose 1.7% to $3.781.50. Tin increased 2.1% to $52,305. Nickel climbed 1.2%, to $15,730.
-
AI-related companies drive the majority of third-quarter US earnings increases
US companies will likely deliver a third-quarter earnings surge, and AI-related players, like the stock market rally, are driving most of these gains. Investors are excited about the hyper-growth of AI companies, but they are also concerned about the future of the share price and how long this trend will continue. According to Tajinder dhillon, LSEG’s head of earnings research and equity, analysts expect S&P500 earnings to increase by 31% in the third quarter. Two-thirds will come from the tech sector, including AI giants Alphabet and Amazon.com, as well as Meta Platforms. The S&P 500 reached a new record this week, ahead of earnings season. This is expected to begin unofficially next?week when banks such as JPMorgan Chase or Goldman Sachs report their results. "It is all AI, and to a lesser degree, energy and material, but this is because of geopolitics,"?Sameer samana, the head of global equity and real assets at Wells Fargo Investment Institute. It wouldn't be surprising if 70-80% growth could be attributed tech and AI. The US oil price has risen by roughly 30% during the third quarter due to the ongoing US-Israeli conflict with Iran. Samana pointed out that the?earnings estimates for the third-quarter are among the lowest. Strategists are unsure if the third-quarter growth in earnings can match the explosive growth seen in the second quarter. Most companies beat analyst's estimates and this is likely to continue in the third quarter. LSEG data shows that the S&P 500's earnings grew by 54% in the second quarter, the highest growth since 2021. LSEG data showed that excluding mark-to-market gains from Alphabet and Amazon.com for AI-related investments the growth rate was still about 35%. This is the highest level since 2021. Anthony Saglimbene is the chief market strategist of Ameriprise Financial. He said that investors should be concerned because we're approaching "peak earnings growth" in this cycle. "A lot is this AI trade built on continuing capex spending. Every quarter, as they continue to do so, the hurdle rates and scrutiny get higher." Dhillon, based upon LSEG data, said that earnings for US semiconductor firms, which are among the largest beneficiaries of the AI boom will?have risen by about 136% compared to about 158% during the second quarter. Nick Raich is the CEO of Earnings Scout. Three months ago, we were going 150 miles per hour. Raich stated that the latest reports, including those from Micron Technology, were strong and suggested other companies continue to "reap the benefits." Micron, a chipmaker, forecasted quarterly revenue that was above expectations and said customers had boosted their commitments to its long-term supply agreements up to $32 billion. This week, Google signed a huge power deal with Constellation Energy. Investors will also be paying close attention to the impact of higher interest rates on corporate profits during this earnings season. The US bond yields are rising due to concerns over inflation, high oil prices, and debt problems elsewhere. Samana warned that heavy borrowers such as utilities are at risk.
-
Campaign group warns that the new Congress in Brazil poses a threat to environmental legislation
According to a report by the climate advocacy group Observatorio Do?Clima that found almost 70% of elected legislators have no or little interest in environmental issues, Brazil's new Congress will likely pose a greater obstacle to legislation protecting the environment after elections this month. The study examined bills, legislative initiatives, speeches, and public statements made by newly elected and reelected legislators. It concluded that 64 out of 81 senators have demonstrated a "very low" commitment to environmental issues. In the lower chamber, 345 out of 511 legislators were placed in the same category. According to the study, the Liberal Party, which is home to Flavio Bolsonaro (a right-wing senator) who will be facing President Luiz Inacio Lula in a presidential runoff later this month has the lowest environmental credentials of all major parties. Bolsonaro defeated Lula in a first round despite pollsters' predictions, but he didn't get enough votes to prevent a second ballot. The environmental commitment of all 28 senators and lower house members who were elected by the party on Sunday was rated as very low. The study also found that other right-leaning political parties, such as?Novo and Republicanos, Progressistas, and Uniao Brasil showed low support for environmental issues. Observatorio do Clima stated that environmental advocates may face a more 'challenging' political landscape if Bolsonaro, whose previous?comments about climate change caused concern, is elected President. I contacted the parties named but did not receive a response. The group said that proposals to weaken environmental protections, such as measures to reduce protected lands, allow mining on Indigenous land, and ease licensing requirements for environmental matters, could gain "traction" under the new Congress. Suely Araujo is the public policy coordinator for the group. She said, "This image shows four years of hard work by those who are focused on climate and environment issues."
-
Trump's comment that Iran can 'take out Los Angeles' was misinterpreted
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that comments he made about Iran being able to "take out" California cities were misinterpreted. He was referring instead to the need for people to tolerate higher gasoline prices. Trump made these remarks on Monday at a Nebraska political rally, where he talked about the economic sacrifices of Americans during World War II. "Remember that the 'war' is artificial, it costs a lot, but it's worth it," he said. "It is a small price to pay in order to keep the world and our country safe. They could take out an entire city. Let's?take Los Angeles out, let's?take San Diego out. It's a small price to pay and it will be over very soon." California's Democratic Leaders and some Republican colleagues quickly condemned the remarks. Trump stated in a Truth Social posting on Thursday that "a temporary increase in Gasoline prices is a small price to be paid for Iran not having a nuclear weapon." "If you want to see a huge price, can you imagine what would happen if they bombed San Diego and/or Los Angeles?" He continued by saying he loved both cities. Trump has dismissed concerns about cost of living stemming the Iran conflict in the past.
-
US to rescind methane policy against oil and gas industry
The US Environmental Protection Agency announced on Wednesday that it would be scrapping the Biden-era regulation aimed at curbing large leaks of'methane' from oil and gas operations. The move is part a broader effort by the Trump administration to reduce regulations, which it claims burden US businesses in its quest to increase fossil fuel production. "Americans should be able to afford heating their homes during the winter and filling up their cars to drive to work." The people who produce the energy cannot?do this when they are burdened by unnecessary burdens," EPA Administator Lee Zeldin stated in a press release after announcing the decision at a meeting with representatives of the oil and gas industries in New Mexico. The "super emitter program" of the EPA requires that companies react when third parties use remote sensing to report suspected methane leaks. After taking office in 2017, the Trump administration?delayed implementing this policy until next. EPA claimed that its proposal to rescind this?rule could save $45 billion a yearly. The oil and gas industry, which is a major source of methane, is responsible for the second largest?cause?of climate change?after carbon dioxide. Environmental groups have criticized the move. In a statement, Mahyar Sorour of Sierra Club's Beyond Fossil Fuels said: "This giveaway is foolish and shortsighted. It reveals to whom the Trump administration works - its political donors."
-
US seizes $3 Million in fuel shipments from Cuba as crackdown continue
The US announced on Wednesday that it had seized 90 separate shipments of biodiesel bound to Cuba, worth nearly $3 million. This is the second time this week US authorities have announced the seizure "illegal" fuel en route to Cuba. The Trump administration is continuing to choke off Cuba's energy industry, only allowing small amounts of fuel to be shipped to the private sector on the island in an effort to undercut the Cuban government. Jose Figueroa, Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Miami, told Miami reporters on Wednesday that the seized cargo was destined for Enetec, an Enetec-based state-owned fuel firm sanctioned earlier this year by the US. The authorities said that they intercepted fuel shipments at Port Everglades in south Florida and Houston before they left the US. Homeland Security reported that more than 600,000 gallons were seized. Figueroa stated that "an effort of this magnitude to undermine US sanction is not an accident." These actions are aimed at shipments that could benefit the Cuban government through a state controlled entity. Anyone who attempts to undermine US laws to fund, facilitate or profit from such an effort should be put on notice. Cuba's government didn't?comment immediately on the fuel seizure. Cuba's communist-run government has called the Trump administration's blockade of fuel on Cuba "economic war" and "illegal". The blockade has exacerbated the ongoing problems of blackouts, shortages of water and inflation on the island, pushing it towards a humanitarian catastrophe. US President Donald Trump stated openly that his goal is to overthrow Cuba's government with the?blockade & sanctions. Last week, the US Coast Guard announced that they had intercepted in September a large container vessel carrying fuel bound for Cuba. The Coast Guard said that the ship was attempting to evade authorities, and had large amounts of fuel hidden within its ballast tanks. In either case, the US has not disclosed the identities of the exporters.
-
Russia claims that Ukraine has struck two nuclear facilities at Zaporizhzhia
The head of Russia's state nuclear corporation said that despite the fact that Ukrainian drones had attacked two facilities at Zaporizhzhia, a Russian-held nuclear power plant in southeast Ukraine, there was no danger to nuclear safety. Alexei Likhachev said that a driver who was delivering food to plant workers had been killed by the drone attack. Likhachev said that a laboratory and a plant for the processing of radioactive waste were targeted. Ukraine has yet to comment on the incident. The plant's management announced on?Saturday that Ukrainian shelling in recent weeks has damaged the external power supply equipment. Electricity is currently provided by emergency diesel generators. The plant does not produce electricity, but it needs two external links for power to cool nuclear fuel. In the first few weeks of the war, which began with Moscow's invasion of its smaller neighbor in February 2022, Russia captured the?plant - Europe's biggest with six reactors. Since then, Moscow and Kyiv accuse each other regularly of military actions that compromise nuclear safety. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog has repeatedly taken action to ensure a ceasefire surrounding the plant so that repairs could be made to the lines connecting the facility to the main grid. UN monitors are at the Zaporizhzhia and three other plants in Ukraine. Maria Zakharova of the Russian Foreign Ministry wrote on her ministry's website that the West was enabling Ukrainian aggressions by not publicly condemning them. Zakharova wrote that "Kyiv has intensified its shelling of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant because Western countries have not responded appropriately to these actions, effectively facilitating new assaults." "Such an attitude toward strikes by the Ukrainian military shows the true 'value' of statements made by representatives of these nations about nuclear and physical safety at international forums."
-
The top cases in the US Supreme Court docket
US Supreme Court will hear a number of important cases in its new term, which begins Monday. These include issues like President Donald Trump's Immigration Policies, the ban on assault-style rifles, the financial responsibility of Big Oil for climate change and Republican-backed voting restriction. This is a list of some of the cases that are being argued in the current term. The term runs until the end of June. Big Oil Climate Suit ExxonMobil, Suncor Energy and Boulder officials argued on October 5, attempting to "thwart" a lawsuit filed by Boulder officials. The Justices grappled with the complex question of whether local governments should be allowed to hold oil companies responsible for harms caused by climate change. After Colorado's highest court allowed Boulder to sue them for violating state laws and seeking unspecified damages, the companies filed an appeal. Trump's administration supported the companies. The justices expressed concerns over unduly restricting the power of states to pursue litigation related to climate change, and the potential for chaos if local government across the nation were allowed to sue these corporations. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June. TRUMP'S MANDATORY DETENTION OF IMMIGRANTS The court will determine the legality Trump's policy, which subjects millions of illegal immigrants living in the US to mandatory detention while deportation proceedings are underway. Trump's policy of mass deportation includes this policy. The Supreme Court heard the Trump administration appeal of a lower-court ruling that ruled against the policy, in a case concerning a Brazilian citizen. The US administration has abandoned its long-standing interpretation of federal laws that allowed immigrants living in the US to be released under bond until their cases were heard in immigration court. Dates for the arguments have not been set yet. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June. DEPORTATIONS TO A THIRD COUNTRY BY TRUMP In December, the justices will hear arguments over the Trump administration’s policy to deport migrants to "third countries", or other nations than their home country. They won't give them the opportunity to demonstrate the harms that they might face. On September 29, the court allowed the Trump administration to continue its policy, suspending a federal judge’s ruling that deporting migrants to third-country countries was illegal. Human rights groups claim that more than 25,000 migrants were deported under this policy to 29 different countries. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June. Ban on assault-style rifles On December 2, the justices will hear arguments in a challenge against state prohibitions of 'assault style rifles. This case involves a weapon type that is often associated with mass killings. The lower courts in Cook County Illinois and Connecticut upheld the bans on powerful semiautomatic weapons such as AR-15s. Lower courts rejected arguments that these measures violated the US Constitution's Second Amendment rights to "keep and bear arms." Gun rights groups, as well as other opponents, have argued that Supreme Court precedents regarding the Second Amendment protect firearms in "common usage." The end of June is the expected date for a ruling. Voting Rights On December 8, the justices will hear arguments in a Republican led bid to reinstate voter restrictions in Arizona. This would require proof of citizenship for all voter registrants, and purge voter lists in Arizona from alleged non-US citizen voters. Republicans appealed a lower court's decision to stop certain provisions of Arizona law for violating federal voting registration laws. The Trump administration has supported key aspects of the appeal. The Arizona measure, according to critics, adds additional mandates for voting which unfairly targets Latinos and Native American voters. These groups tend to support Democratic candidates. The ruling is expected to be made by the end of June. LGBT RIGHTS On November 3, the justices will hear arguments in an appeal by the Archdiocese of Denver, and other Catholic entities, to be exempted of a Colorado program that funds preschools' nondiscrimination requirements. A lower court ruled that Colorado's program didn't violate the First Amendment rights of the Catholic plaintiffs. State funds are provided for preschools. The Catholic plaintiffs objected that the state required schools receiving funding through the program to give all children an "equal chance" to enroll in pre-school, regardless of certain characteristics. This included the sexual orientation of students and their families. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June. EPIC GAMES SUE AGAINST Apple Apple will try to avoid being found in contempt by the justices in its legal battle with Epic Games, the maker of "Fortnite". The iPhone maker had been found to be in violation of an order from a court ordering sweeping changes in its lucrative App Store as part the antitrust litigation. Apple appealed the ruling of a lower court that upheld a federal judge's decision in Oakland, California finding Apple in contempt for Epic's lawsuit against App Store fees. Dates for the arguments have not yet been announced. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June. PEPSICO TRADEMARK CASE The court will hear arguments regarding a claim by Rise Brewing, a maker of canned coffees, to hold PepsiCo responsible for an alleged trademark violation involving Pepsi’s morning energy beverage "Mtn Dew Rise." Rise Brewing appealed the ruling of a lower court that rejected the company's claim the name "Mtn Dew Rise," infringes on its trademarks, and confuses customers with its coffee brand. No date has been set for the arguments. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
The 5-week U.S.-Israeli air campaign has destroyed some of Iran's most treasured monuments.
The ancient city of Isfahan was shaken by a first wave of blasts. Minarets and domes were swaying in the famous square. Two days later, another bombing in Isfahan's city center left the 400-year-old palace complex covered with debris.
The Israeli airstrikes on March 7 and 9 shook monuments in Naqsh-e Jahan Square and Chehel Sotoun Palace - two of Iran's most prized cultural complexes. Plaster and broken tiles still crunch underfoot in some places, two weeks after the airstrikes.
Rasoul Mosavi said, "These buildings felt like a part of us", his head still covered in gauze after the explosion. He guided journalists through the museum, where he worked as a guard for 16 year. "This place is dear to me."
The intended target was less than 200 metres away from the roof: the Isfahan Governor's Building, which had been partially destroyed but appeared empty when struck. Before the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran ended, journalists had rare access in March to the palace, Naqsh-e Jahan Square and its surrounding area, and two palaces in Tehran. The journalists saw for themselves how the war had damaged Iran's historical sites, some of which are protected by an international treaty administered under the U.N. cultural agency UNESCO. The journalists reported damage to 11 historic buildings.
Experts who monitor the impact of war on world heritage sites confirmed damage to the Trans-Iranian Railway in Isfahan and the Jameh Mosque, as well as a 1,800-year-old castle near prehistoric caves where humans settled as far back as 63,000-years ago.
In the two decades that?the United States, its allies, and their coalition partners fought in Iraq, Syria Libya, and Afghanistan on ground and by air, there were no damage done to sites of cultural heritage listed by UNESCO at the time.
UNESCO is yet to send teams to sites listed in its register and relies on satellite imagery to assess 'the damage. UNESCO has'verified' damage to seven sites, including two that are on the international list, four cultural properties with national significance, and a religious place.
UNESCO said it had not been consulted before or during war, but that "all parties to the conflict" were provided with coordinates for critical sites.
The world body called on all parties to conflict to respect international law and take all necessary steps to protect cultural heritage.
The damage ranged from broken glass, cracked tile and shook foundations to shattered walls and shattered tiles. Bomb shock waves that radiated out at a speed nearly 20 times greater than sound were the main culprits. According to Wes Bryant a former U.S. Air Force targeting specialist, those waves can cause serious damage to structures up to a kilometer from the explosion itself.
Israel Defense Forces confirmed that they had targeted the Governor's Office in Isfahan. This is located adjacent to the UNESCO listed palace complex. The Israeli Defense Forces also confirmed that it struck a base of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on March 7, a little more than a kilometer away from the historical sites.
IDF stated that the IDF operated in accordance with International Law and only targeted military objectives. Israel's attacks, according to the statement, "were generally based on reliable information, operational verification and established approval processes and, when appropriate, legal review and were carried out conformément to applicable international law."
Eight experts in Middle Eastern Archaeology and Preservation of Heritage Sites said that the reporting shows a shift in U.S. Targeting Practices and Priorities away from Protecting Internationally Recognized Historical Landmarks. The Pentagon has changed its policies to protect cultural sites after two decades of widespread criticism over an American military installation in the ruins the ancient city Babylon.
Bryant stated that in recent wars historical landmarks were included on the "no-strike lists". He said this was because they had to be considered a military necessity such as saving the lives of soldiers and also receive high-level approval from officials, including the White House.
The sites that were damaged included the Golestan Palace in Tehran, the Naqsh-e Jahan Square in Isfahan and the Chehel Sotoun Complex. These sites have been confirmed by visits. Mehrnoush Soroush is the director of Center for Ancient Middle Eastern Landscapes at University of Chicago, which tracks damaged?cultural site in Iran. Her team has also confirmed damage to Jameh Mosque, in Isfahan, and the Andimeshk Railway Station along the Trans-Iranian Railway. This UNESCO-listed route connects the Caspian Sea, in the northeast, with the Gulf.
Soroush as well as UNESCO confirmed the extensive damage to Falak-ol-Aflak - an ancient fortress located in the Khorramabad valley of western Iran. Photos of window damage were verified. Israel's military warned Iranian citizens to avoid trains in early April, and Israel's official statement said that the Qom rail bridge was damaged to stop Iran from moving weapons.
Iran's UNESCO rep provided a list to the U.N. Cultural body of 134 cultural sites that it claimed were damaged by war. Despite not being listed on the UNESCO list, these sites are among Iran's most popular tourist destinations, bringing millions of tourists every year.
Only the railway was directly affected by the UNESCO site. Iran has marked its culturally most significant sites, such as the bazaar of Isfahan and the fortress located in the Khorramabad Valley with large blue shields. The Sa'dabad Complex, in Tehran, houses 18 historic palaces. The shields are an internationally recognised symbol that indicates their protected status as cultural property.
It's unbelievable. This was something I would never have imagined in my wildest dreams. Farshid Emami is an associate professor in the Department of Art History at Rice University, Texas. He has written a book about Isfahan Architecture.
The Pentagon has declined to comment.
Operation Epic Fury, the Trump administration's name for its war against Iran, was designed around four key objectives: destroy Iran’s ballistic missiles; demolish production facilities; sink their navy and weaken their proxy forces. "Unlike Iran the United States doesn't target civilians."
The gloves are off
The 1954 Hague Convention is a treaty that protects cultural heritage and explicitly protects Isfahan sites during war. International law considers the intentional targeting of cultural property to be a war crime. Any strikes against nearby targets should be carefully weighed up against any possible damage.
UNESCO's designation only covers a minority of the culturally significant monuments and buildings in a country. Some countries place more importance on their landmarks being listed by this U.N. agency. Iran has 27 sites listed, compared to 55 in Italy and just one in Uganda and Costa Rica.
The most prominent example of damage in Iraq during a U.S. led war was the ancient city Babylon. It was listed as a UNESCO world heritage site by 2019. Coalition forces used Babylon from 2003 to 2004 as a base, digging trenches at the site and installing infrastructure. Saddam Hussein had already damaged it before they arrived. Iraq also suffered cultural losses due to ground combat. These included the destruction of Mosul's old city and the looting of antiquities after the U.S. invasion. Trump withdrew America from UNESCO twice, in 2017 and 2025. He cited its support for divisive, woke cultural and social issues. The 2025 action will take effect this year.
In 2017, U.S. coalition forces led by the United States bombed Raqqa's walls, which date back to the 8th century, as a way of supporting ground troops that were fighting ISIS.
Stephennie Mulder is a professor of Islamic architecture and art at the University of Texas at Austin. She said, "As terrible as it was, I feel like that time felt like a golden age compared to the current situation, where the gloves have been taken off and no one cares." She is one of more than 400 researchers and scholars who signed the letter circulated in mid-April, condemning the destruction to Iranian cultural sites by the United States. Israel reported damage caused by an Iranian attack in Tel Aviv’s White City. This is a collection modernist buildings with Bauhaus influences from the 1930s, which are also listed on UNESCO's list. The U.N. said that it was conducting an investigation.
Pete Hegseth, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, has dismissed military engagement rules in large part. He claims that there will be "no mercies" shown to enemies. In April, President Donald Trump said that Iran's entire civilization would be destroyed if the country did not end its conflict. Both did not make a direct mention of heritage sites.
CULTURAL JEWEL
Isfahan, even by Iranian standards, is a cultural gem, compared to Rome, Athens, or Kyoto.
Isfahan is also home to a nuclear site in Iran. It sits on a vast plain of the high Iranian plateau, and straddles a river called Zayanderud. This Persian word means "life-giving". The river divides the city, with the northern part being older and home to historical sites and the southern section, which has wealthier neighborhoods and more modern residential complexes.
Residents gathered around the monuments and heritage sites near the Chehel Sotoun Palace in the Naqsh-e Jahan Square. This square is the largest in the city, measuring 14 soccer fields. It is also one of three UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Isfahan, like many other large cities in Iran, was engulfed by protests this year when anger over dire economic circumstances boiled over. The protests led to the largest crackdown since 1979's Islamic Revolution, which resulted in thousands of deaths, injuries, and prison sentences. Trump's desire to see the Iranian regime overthrown was cited as one of the main reasons for the launch "Operation Epic Fury", which took place in late February.
According to video footage, some of the Isfahan demonstrations and clashes between government forces and protesters took place in the Naqsh-e Jahan Square, and the bazaar was briefly closed during a general.
Israeli bombs targeted IRGC targets on March 7th, 300 meters away from the 400-year-old Si-o-se-pol Bridge over the River. Former residents of Isfahan claim that the complex was used as a detention facility by the elite military force. Israel's military admitted that the base was targeted.
Witnesses said that when bombs rained on the IRGC, blast waves reverberated a kilometer from the site, shaking Naqsh-e Jahan Square.
On March 9, two days later, another volley of bullets aimed at the governor's offices shook again the square and the adjacent Chehel-Sotoun Palace Complex.
Mosavi, an elderly security guard was wrapping up his shift in the Museum of Decorative Arts. The museum was converted from a '17th century royal palace. He said that he was at work because of a "queasy inner feeling".
Only 10 minutes later, twin explosions followed jets flying overhead.
The museum's windows were mostly shattered. The main hall's ceiling collapsed revealing the bones of the building. Mannequins dressed in traditional Iranian clothing were surrounded by plaster and glass.
The entire top floor of the Governor's Office, located less than 200 metres away, has been destroyed. The strike did not injure the governor. The team was not allowed to enter the building but met the governor at a café in the bazaar.
Mosavi displayed twisted gray metal fragments, which he and his employees referred to as shrapnel, at the entrance of the Museum. The fragments were similar to those found at the Sa'dabad Complex in Tehran, an 18th century site that was struck by bombs in March.
According to the U.S. Committee of the Blue Shield and two former military targeting experts, heritage sites like schools or hospitals are usually on the no-strike list compiled and maintained by military and intelligence agencies. According to international law, any collateral damage must be proportional to the expected military benefit of striking a site close to a heritage or cultural site.
Patty Gerstenblith is the head of the U.S. Committee of the Blue Shield. The group has trained the American military to protect cultural sites in wartime.
Gerstenblith, along with other experts, said that when Mosul and Raqqa was reclaimed by Islamic State the Blue Shield committee prepared and distributed informational material to the troops before the event. She added that without more information she couldn't judge if the Iranian strikes were appropriate from a military standpoint.
According to a document, Isfahan heritage officials made an initial assessment of the damage caused by the bombings at Naqsh-e Jahan Square. It was impossible to independently verify those findings.
Emami, an architectural historian from Rice University, stated that a thorough investigation was needed to confirm structural damage.
The bombings that occurred in Ali Qapu Palace early in March caused a tremor on a terrace which overlooked the large square, the music chamber, the marble fountain and the 18 wooden columns. Heritage officials took pictures of the crumbling wall, the cracks in the building's body, and the shattered glasses.
In the initial Iranian assessment, more than 70% the glass of windows and doors were broken and the plaster on two porches was separated from the main structure.
Ali Bordbar ran outside of his small carpet store in the bazaar when the bombings occurred on March 7. The bombings caused the two minarets at the southern edge to shake.
Bordbar said that it took hundreds of years for this site to be built. In a single moment, it could be destroyed.
The employees of the Naqsh-e Jahan complex brought in a bag filled with blue tiles that fell off when they visited the Shah Mosque. The Iranian damage assessment for the Isfahan Heritage Sites included a picture of a crack on one of the walls of the mosque.
A silver engraver at the bazaar stated that the economic effects of lost tourism revenues due to war are as devastating as the property damage or shattered glass.
The engraver stated, "This war paralyzed our nation."
The main alleys of the bazaar were nearly empty during the two days that I visited in late March. Only a few young men ran and cycled through them. Artists and musicians were setting up their stands in the bazaar, and some visitors started to arrive.
Iranians avoid speaking with foreign journalists for fear of being arrested or worse. Some expressed their dismay at the destruction of historic sites while others had more nuanced opinions.
Saeed, 32, who runs a sweets shop in the bazaar said that airstrikes had broken all the windows and the glass in his well-organized sweet shop. He declined to give his opinion on the war, as did many Iranians.
He said, "We're waiting for a good ending."
I WAS SHOCKED
The Golestan Palace is a centuries-old complex of royal buildings in Tehran. It's located just a few steps from the city's famous old bazaar. The protests began last December with the shopkeepers of the labyrinthine market. The 'labor strikes' quickly spread from the heartland of Iran’s economy, the old bazaar, to universities and cities throughout the country. The next step was a brutal Iranian crackdown. This was followed by weeks of bombing and the assassination of the supreme ruler in the 'opening salvo of war. The night of March 1, American forces and Israelis struck Tehran's judicial building adjacent to the ancient Palace, which was a sea debris with wooden artwork and mirrors falling from the ceiling.
As journalists stepped on glittering glass shards, a sharp cracking noise echoed from the ceiling of the palace. UNESCO has expressed its "concerns", over the damage to the site.
The morning of the attack was described by an archeology worker who had worked at the palace for almost 30 years. She cried as she recalled the experience.
She said, under condition of anonymity, "I was shocked and frozen to the spot in front of all that glass when I first came here."
She said that the blast waves had caused the most damage to the space in the throne.
The hall of mirrors, a few meters away was a sea of glass, which had previously adorned the walls and ceilings, as well as the pillars, of the room.
The team was denied access to the third part of a palace, which employees claimed had been damaged in blasts during the strikes on March 1. This area is prohibited, according to them, because it is adjacent to the government office that was targeted by the U.S. and Israel attacks. This building is associated with the Iranian judicial authority.
Tehran's judiciary is known for sending young Iranian men and woman who dared to criticize the regime to prison and even executions. Nearly 300 meters from the palace was the judicial building which came under attack.
The female employee who visited the palace two weeks after the destruction expressed her fears of damage that was invisible to her.
The employee stated that two employees were injured, but only in a minor way.
She suddenly announced that everyone should leave the room immediately after 15 minutes. She ran ahead, pointing at the ceiling, which she warned could collapse at any time. Maggie Michael M.B. (Reporting) Pell, Mari Saito, and Ryan McNeill. Additional reporting by Mayaan Lubell. Alaa Al-Marjani, Haider Kadhim Nour. Edited and produced by Lornant Hinnant, Sarah Cahlan.
(source: Reuters)