Latest News

UK loses its appeal against tougher police powers to curb street protests

The London Court of Appeal rejected Britain's bid to grant police greater powers to impose restrictions on protests on the streets on Friday. Civil rights group Liberty called it a "huge victory for democracy".

Liberty has successfully challenged the changes made to public order laws by the former Conservative government. The High Court ruled last year that government exceeded its power by lowering police thresholds to impose conditions.

After a brief delay, the Home Office, Britain's interior ministry, appealed the ruling. They argued that ministers could lower the threshold even without new legislation.

Akiko Hart, Liberty's director, said that the government should now remove these new powers.

She said that the next step is for the government to accept this decision and agree to do away with this illegal legislation.

Home Office spokesperson stated that the "central powers used by police to manage protests, and ensure they remain peaceful, are not affected by this judgement".

The spokesperson said: "The right to peacefully protest is an important cornerstone of democracy, but it remains clear that the law does not apply to intimidation with intent or to serious disruptions to the lives of communities."

Liberty's case centered on the Public Order Act. Under this act, police can impose restrictions on protests that may cause "serious disturbances to the lives of the community".

After a wave of direct action protests by environmentalists and other activists, the law was amended so that police could impose conditions when a protest might cause "more minor" disruption.

Liberty, on the other hand, claimed that it had given police virtually unlimited powers to stop protests. It cited the arrest of Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg who was subsequently acquitted.

In May 2024, the High Court found that the new powers are illegal. However, the Court of Appeal put on hold the decision to quashing the new powers pending an appeal. Liberty reported that the Court of Appeal will "decide in the next few weeks whether the legislation should be quashed". (Reporting and editing by Sam Tobin)

(source: Reuters)