Latest News

Ghana will introduce new gold royalties on Tuesday, despite opposition from regulators

The head of Ghana's mining regulator said that the country will move ahead with a new gold royalty system on Tuesday, which will?link state revenues to increasing bullion prices. This is despite the opposition from China, other Western governments, and mining executives.

Last week, it was reported that the United States and China along with several other Western countries had made a rare effort to convince Ghana to stop the policy. This is part of an 'overall push by African governments for more value to be derived from the surging commodity price.

The new royalty rate replaces the flat 5% rate that was previously charged by Africa's largest gold producer. According to the framework examined by, gold miners would pay 12% if gold reached $4,500 an ounce under a sliding-scale system. Gold is currently trading at over $5,000 per ounce.

Royalties on lithium will be based on a sliding scale of 5-12%, based upon prices between $1500 and $3200 per metric tonne, while other minerals remain at a flat rate of 5%.

A Regulator Says Policy Has Support

Isaac Tandoh is the CEO of the Minerals Commission. He said that diplomatic missions raised concerns over the top 12% rate, but had not objected to the policy change.

He said that the Ghanaian authorities were not opposed to the review. "They met with us," he stated over the weekend. He said that the missions wanted to see the 12% rate kick in when gold hits $5,000 per ounce. However, Ghanaian authorities refused this proposal.

Ghana's proposed sliding-scale royalty regime has also been opposed by the CEOs of world's leading gold miners, who warn that it will choke off future investment.

Kenneth Ashigbey, CEO of the Ghana Chamber?of?Mines, said on Sunday that it will "dry up" new projects and output.

Tandoh claimed that the sliding scale achieved a balance between boosting state revenue and preserving industry margins. He dismissed concerns Ghana would become uncompetitive by arguing investors are more concerned about regulatory stability rather than marginal cost shifts.

(source: Reuters)