Latest News

Russian oil tycoon Shvidler lost Supreme Court appeal against UK sanction

The UK Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that billionaire oil tycoon Eugene Shvidler's appeal against British sanctions imposed upon him due to Moscow's invasion in Ukraine was dismissed.

Shvidler received a sanction in March 2022 because of his relationship with Roman Abramovich - the former owner of Chelsea Football Club - and Shvidler's previous position as director of Evraz, a Russian steel producer listed on London. Forbes magazine estimates Shvidler's net worth at $1.6 billion. His lawyers appealed the Supreme Court arguing that other businessmen with greater involvement were not sanctioned. They cited BP's joint venture with Rosneft.

The British Foreign Office, who has sanctioned more than 1,700 people or entities since the Russian invasion, said it was correct to believe that sanctioning Shvidler would achieve Britain's goals in foreign policy.

Shvidler claimed that the Supreme Court's ruling "brings back my USSR days" by rejecting his appeal with a majority of four to one. The ruling confirms Britain's record of successfully defending sanctions against Russia in court.

Shvidler stated in a press release that no British businesses or individuals with links to Russian state-owned firms have been sanctioned. He added that Britain's actions were "more of a cheap virtue signaling for purely political reasons".

He added, "There is little sympathy from the public for me as a wealthy US/UK entrepreneur, but I think this judgement applies to everyone who faces state power."

The Foreign Office didn't immediately respond to an inquiry for comment.

STRIDENT DISSENT

Shvidler said that British sanctions had destroyed his business, and disrupted the lives of his family and himself.

The majority of the Supreme Court found that the sanctions struck an equitable balance between Shvidler’s rights and the goals of the sanctions regime.

The majority judgment of Judges Philip Sales & Vivien rose stated that there was a "rational link" between the sanctioning Shvidler, and the goal to incentivize him to oppose Russia’s invasion and exert pressure on Abramovich.

The statement said that sanctioning Shvidler would "send a clear message to those in Mr Shvidler’s position to stay away from Russian business".

In a stridently dissenting decision, Judge George Leggatt said that Britain's "flimsy" reasons for sanctioning Shvidler didn't justify the "serious intrusion of freedom" sanctions.

He said that it would be irrational for Shvidler to be sanctioned only if the British sanctions were likely to achieve their goals by punishing Shvidler because he was a director at a company that had invested in Russia's extractives sector.

BP declined comment. The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by Russian businessman Sergei Naumenko whose superyacht, worth 51 million dollars and 44 million euros, was detained in London.

(source: Reuters)