Latest News

The U.S. uses an Iranian smuggling technique to sneak oil from the Gulf

US military conducted a number of secretive oil transfers between ships to maintain Gulf energy exports. They used aerial and water drones, as well as helicopters to guide convoys towards awaiting tankers. Operation on the Strait of Hormuz uses a technique that Iran has used for years to avoid sanctions. Eleven people who are familiar with the operation identified two specific locations for the oil transfers. One is off the coasts of Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, and the other is off Oman's Sohar port. According to satellite imagery and shipping data, the transfer began in early May. At least 92 vessels have been involved.

Satellite images show that as recently as June 1117, pairs of ships were seen transferring oil at two sites simultaneously. Four sources, including an ex-U.S. official who was aware of the attack, claim that the Apache helicopter shot down by Iran on the 9th, which sparked retaliatory attacks by the U.S. Satellite imagery showed six pairs of oil tankers clustered in a small area near the port of Sohar on the day that the Apache helicopter was shot down.

Could not confirm the role of the Apache in the operation. A U.S. Defense official responded to questions by saying that no Central Command forces were involved in the offshore ship-toship oil transfer operations. U.S. officials confirmed that a drone boat rescued both crew members.

Prior to this, the extent of the transfers, their working, and Apache's involvement in the operation were not reported. Centcom was contacted by the White House. The Iranian government has not responded to requests for comments about the transfer operation. These two locations, located in the Gulf of Oman, near the exit of Strait of Hormuz are very close to the borders drawn by the Persian Gulf Strait Authority. This is a newly established Iranian body that was created to manage the Hormuz Strait. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps may use drones and missiles to attack ships that do not comply with Iran’s orders. Fujairah has been repeatedly targeted by Iran during the U.S. led operation. According to British maritime risk management company Vanguard, a "unknown projectile", which struck a tanker near the coast of Oman, occurred over the weekend. Vanguard stated in a press release that the crew were safe, and the impact had caused some cargo leakage but not environmental damage. The statement did not say whether the tanker had been involved in a transfer from ship to ship. Iran's response to the U.S./Israeli conflict was to effectively close the Strait of Hormuz through which a fifth of the world's oil is normally consumed. This caused the largest global energy disruption in history, and has sparked inflation all over the world. Although risky and inefficient transfers from ship to ship, they appear to be part of Trump's administration's effort to restore normal oil flow from the Gulf. Donald Trump, the U.S. president, said that Friday would be the reopening of Strait of Hormuz under a framework agreement with Iran announced earlier this week. Details are still vague. The announced deal did not affect oil transfers, but it was impossible to determine. An investigation published on May 20 revealed that Iran had established its own system to guide ships through the Strait. This involved island checkpoints and diplomatic deals, as well as sometimes fees.

STAGGERED Departures and Waypoints

Eight sources confirmed that the U.S. Military is in full control of the American transfer operations, including the private security contractor involved with the transfers.

According to satellite imagery and one source, tankers are required to sail to a rendezvous point before reaching the strait. Then, they must stagger their departures to be?around 3,000-4,000 meters apart. Four sources claim that their transponders and lights have been dimmed.

The U.S. military can monitor the tankers' progress by setting up waypoints. But the Americans "are obviously watching you at all times," according to one source.

The oil transfer begins when the tankers pass through the strait just outside the zone Iran has designated as its own. The oil transfer takes between 24 to 40 hours. The VLCCs are then loaded and sail through the Strait.

This ship-to ship operation is possible because a few shippers are willing to navigate their vessels through this strait in order to deliver oil to waiting tankers despite the Iranian ban.

The operation is dangerous. Noam Raydan is a Washington Institute senior fellow who specializes on maritime risk. He reviewed the findings.

Iran has used the ship-to-ship method for years in order to avoid sanctions because it hides the source. Iran usually operates one pair of vessels at a given time to avoid detection, and also because its exports before the war were small. The U.S. led operation, which involves massive transfers, provides Gulf producers with better protection against Iranian retaliatory strikes so that they can move crude oil, condensate, and petroleum products to foreign buyers.

The review of more than 12 satellite images between May 2 and 11 June showed ship-to-ship transfer involving Gulf state-owned tanker fleets, and international vessels receiving the oil. LSEG and Kpler data on shipping reviewed by revealed repeated rendezvous of tankers operating within the area.

Based on the imagery, it was calculated that 90 million barrels or more of crude oil and petroleum-based products have likely moved through the offshore system since early May. Based on the tankers carrying capacity, the volumes are still low compared to pre-war levels of approximately 20 million barrels per day that passed through this strait.

Michael Froman wrote a Friday note in which he said that "as the old rules are weakening, it is ironic that America now takes a page from the playbook used by China, Russia and North Korea as well as Iran, who pioneered the use of these methods to avoid U.S. sanctions and UN sanctions." Froman was the president of the Council on Foreign Relations. He was referring to the practice of sending vessels through the strait with no transponders. Trump had mentioned this in his comments on June 10, after the downing the Apache.

Six sources who had direct knowledge of the operations said that the U.S. supported participating vessels by combining aerial surveillance, compliance screening, and monitoring instead of naval escort. No indication was found that U.S. personnel were involved directly in the transfers.

According to an analysis of shipping records, the receiving side?of the operation has been dominated by international operators. Dynacom Tankers, a Greek company, has spoken of its attempts to find innovative ways to ship oil across the strait ever since the conflict began on February 28,

George Procopiou (founder of Dynacom) told the Capital Link Shipping Conference in Athens, Greece, on June 1, that "freedom of navigation was essential, and no one could impose tolls, or any other burden." He said, "We're here to serve and Greece has a tradition of breaking blocksades since ancient times." "I'm not going to get into details, but the hints I gave should be enough for you to understand what I meant."

Dynacom has not responded to an immediate request for a comment about the U.S. operations.

A maritime source said, however, that the new system poses its own risks to their industry.

The source for maritime security said that there was a lack of reliable data. Transponders that communicate the location of ships are turned off and companies do not report through the usual reporting centers. This increases the risk of collisions between ships traveling at night without lights at speeds which make maneuvering difficult.

According to four sources who are familiar with the arrangements, operators wishing to access the system must undergo a compliance assessment process before they can be allocated transit window. This process involves submitting information to U.S. Navy’s Naval Cooperation and?Guidance for Shipping Office in Bahrain.

Operators are required to review two preliminary compliance documents to ensure that they have complete geospatial track histories, a full disclosure of beneficial ownership, documentation for cargo, and an agreement to allow cargo testing.

After approval, the participating vessels will be assigned transit times and stay in touch with the U.S. Military?offices in Bahrain during the entire voyage. According to the shipping records examined by, Emirati exports make up a significant portion of the U.S. transfers. According to six of the sources, UAE's national oil company ADNOC was among the most active participants.

Kuwait Oil Tanker Company is also involved in the transfers. TankerTrackers.com reports that 2.3 million barrels were taken from one of their ships on the coast of Sohar, which was one of the busiest transfer days. Five days later, the receiving ship Sea Ruby was seen off India's south-west coast, bound for China where cargo was to be discharged.

Requests for comments from the UAE government, ADNOC, and Kuwait Oil Tanker Company were not answered.

Raydan said, "I do not see a solution permanent to all this." This is a temporary fix in extraordinary times. (Reporting from Feras Dalatey in Dubai, Jonathan Saul in London and Dmitry Zhdannikov in London.) Erin Banco contributed additional reporting from Washington, and Lori HInnant edited the article.

(source: Reuters)