Latest News

Gazprom, the Russian energy giant, has scrapped its dividend due to high interest rates

Gazprom, the Russian energy giant, has scrapped its dividend due to high interest rates

Gazprom, the state-owned Russian energy giant, announced on Thursday that it had decided not to pay a dividend for 2024's results. This was in accordance with the position of the government and despite last year's return to profitability.

The government is not helped by the absence of dividends, since it owns just under half of the share capital. It faces a number challenges, including falling oil and gas revenue, rising inflation, increased military spending, and a budget gap.

Gazprom shares fell 4.42% to 130.5 roubles at the Moscow Stock Exchange as of 1335 GMT after the announcement.

According to the company's own dividend policy, approved in 2019, 50% of adjusted net profits should be allocated for dividend payout.

Gazprom reported last month a net income for 2024 after a loss in 2023 of nearly $7 billion, its first loss since 1999 due to the collapse of gas exports into Europe. Some market watchers have not ruled out a dividend payment.

Gazprom, according to a source in the industry, is trying to reduce high debt service costs despite steep interest rates. Since last October, the central bank's main rate is at an all-time high of 21%.

Gazprom’s financial report, prepared according to Russian accounting standards reveals that its interest rate on debt will double in 2024 from 238.6 to 482.5 billion Russian roubles.

Analysts at PSB said that "high rates will result in Gazprom paying more interest this year. The company will likely focus on reducing its debt load rather than pay dividends."

Gazprom only paid an interim dividend once since the beginning of the so-called special military operation by Moscow in Ukraine, in February 2022. This was in the autumn of the same year, due to the high gas prices that were in Europe.

Gazprom did not pay any dividends on its results for 2021, the first time they have done so since 1998. This is due to high taxes and spending. (Reporting and editing by Louise Heavens/Andrew Osborn, Oksana Kobieva).

(source: Reuters)