Latest News

Australian prosecutors drop billionaire Forrest's case versus Meta

Australian prosecutors have terminated mining tycoon Andrew Forrest's criminal prosecution of Meta over what he said were countless rip-off cryptocurrency advertisements on Facebook that feature his face.

The decision is a problem for Forrest, the 37% owner of iron ore manufacturer Fortescue Metals Group and Australia's. second-richest individual, in his mission to hold the internet giant. liable for the ads. A separate civil claim he has actually submitted. against Meta over the ads in California is ongoing.

A representative for the Commonwealth Director of Public. Prosecutions said on Friday that the department had discovered there. was inadequate evidence to continue the prosecution, but did. not elaborate.

Forrest has accused Meta of breaking Australia's anti-money. laundering laws by permitting third-party fraudsters to use its. software application and platform to market fake cryptocurrency plans. that function photos of his face, leading individuals to think he. had actually backed them.

He had actually pursued the claim under Australian laws that allow. a specific to criminally prosecute a foreign corporation with. the authorization of the chief law officer.

Forrest said in a declaration that the decision to dismiss the. case was a catastrophe for innocent parents and grandparents who. have actually lost their life savings.

A Meta spokesperson said rip-offs were an intricate danger,. wrongdoers use every readily available platform and our compassion goes. out to people who have actually been impacted.

Meta doesn't want rip-offs on its platforms and we will. continue to work tirelessly to prevent them and protect our. users, the spokesperson stated.

Forrest included that he would continue to pursue the. California case, in which he implicates the U.S. firm of taking. inadequate steps to avoid the advertisements.

In a declare that case, Forrest said Meta promised him in. 2019 that it would assist eliminate the scam ads featuring. his face, but that the ads kept appearing for Australian. Facebook users, resulting in large losses for individuals who were. duped.

The social networks giant has argued that a U.S. law exempts. internet platforms from duty for content published by. third parties and has actually sought to have Forrest's claim. dismissed. Forrest contends that Meta's argument is void,. arguing that the U.S. law only applies locally.

From April 2023 to November 2023, more than 1,000 such. advertisements appeared on Facebook, Forrest's filing said.

(source: Reuters)