Latest News

Can you price a global regime shift? McGeever

The latest trade war and foreign policy salvos from Donald Trump are upsetting the global markets. But the question is if these ructions escalate or fade, as they did in the past 12 months.

It is more likely that the latter, but it is clear that investors struggle to price the fundamental shifts in geopolitical plates.

The changes that have already occurred in 2026 will be truly astounding. The Trump?administration appears to have?removed Venezuela's leader and is now the Latin American nation's defacto ruler.

The threat of an American response is still present after a violent crackdown in Iran on protests has resulted in the deaths of thousands.

Trump is also trying to buy Greenland by any means from Denmark, another NATO ally. The U.S. - Europe alliance and the rules-based world order that has been built up since World War Two are in danger.

It is also a minefield on the economic and financial front. Trump has made a number of interventionist decisions on everything from mortgage-backed securities to credit card rates, and he's also pressed U.S. oil executives into investing billions in Venezuela. We should not forget that his Justice Department continues to threaten to indict Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.

This "Trumpian attack" on the U.S.-based rules-based order, to borrow Matt King's phrase, the founder of?Satori Insights, seemed at odds with relative calm in the markets.

This calm is breaking apart. Stocks, bonds, and the dollar have been impacted by a sell-off triggered by Trump's escalating spat with many of America’s closest European allies. Gold, the safe-haven, has risen to $4,700 an ounce.

It looks like the 'Sell America" trade is back. If last year's performance is any indication, the market jitters could turn out to be speedbump on the road to new highs instead of roadblocks.

The fundamentals matter, right?

Wall Street will not stay down long if we ignore the geopolitical drama. The consensus expectation for U.S. corporate profits and economic growth is high.

The International Monetary Fund on Monday raised its 2026 U.S. growth estimate ?to 2.4% from 2.1% in October, due in part to ?the huge sums being plowed into artificial-intelligence data centers, chips and power generation.

Early indications of the fourth quarter earnings are also encouraging. So far, 84.8% of the 33 S&P 500 companies that have announced earnings have surpassed expectations. If the LSEG consensus estimates for year-onyear earnings growth of 9,0% materializes, this should put upward pressure to equities.

Remember that high levels of uncertainty aren't always bad for profits or growth. In some cases it can even be positive. Imagine the amount of money needed to fund the global rearmament or the race for energy independence and AI independence.

No room for LIMBO

The relative calm of the markets over the last year could be attributed to a virtuous circle - or, put another way, a false illusion. The steady flow of money from passive investment funds into the credit and equity market helps to keep volatility down and prices high. Investors will continue to dance as long as there is music playing.

The confusing trends in the past year, including simultaneous rallies of both risk-on and risk-off assets, also show that it's very hard to accurately price a risk of this magnitude. What is the value that an investor places on the demise of NATO, the U.S. Europe alliance or the rise of a multi-polar world divided into three "spheres" of influence headed by the U.S. China and Russia?

For investors, regime changes are difficult to navigate. You are either at war, or you're not at war. Matt King, Satori 'Insights, says that there is no limbo.

The risk rally is consistent, but not necessarily driven. It's very strange. It's not hard to explain, but it has a certain vulnerability.

It also applies to corporate profits. It's assumed that earnings in tech and other areas will stay at their current levels. Analysts' forecasts don't seem to capture threats to the cycle, such as excessive AI capacity due competition from China or regulation pressure from the EU. These risks are still present.

Maybe Trump's move for Greenland is the straw that breaks the backs of investors, and current market anxiety will become a real correction. It's possible that you don't want to bet.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the columnist, who is also the author. Check out Open Interest, your new essential source for global commentary on finance. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.

(source: Reuters)