Latest News
-
Britain announces a critical minerals strategy in order to reduce reliance on external supply
The government announced that Britain has launched a new critical minerals strategy to reduce its dependence on foreign suppliers. By 2035, it aims to supply 10% of the domestic demand with UK-produced materials and 20% through recycling. The strategy, which is backed by new funding of up to 50 millions pounds, aims to ensure that no more than 60 percent of UK supply of any critical mineral will come from one country by 2035. In a statement, British Prime Minister Keir starmer stated that critical minerals are "the backbone of modern living and our national safety." He argued that increasing domestic production and recycling could help protect the economy and assist efforts to reduce living costs. The UK government stated that the country currently produces only 6% of their critical mineral requirements domestically. The plan aims to increase domestic extraction and processing with a focus on lithium and nickel. It wants to produce 50,000 tonnes or more of lithium in the UK before 2035. The UK faces an urgent demand for a long-term, secure supply of minerals such as copper, nickel and lithium, which are vital for electric vehicles, smartphones, and data centers, and are increasingly important for artificial intelligence. The British government has said that the demand for materials essential to Britain is increasing rapidly. By 2035, copper consumption will nearly double, and lithium demand will increase by 1,100%. China's strategy highlights its grip on vital mineral supplies. This leaves the sector vulnerable to price fluctuations, geopolitical tensions and sudden interruptions. Britain pointed out that China controls about 70% of rare-earth mining and 90% refining. This dominance puts countries like the UK at risk. In the early part of this year, Britain signed a deal to cooperate on minerals with Saudi Arabia. The aim was to improve supply chains, open doors for British companies, and attract new investment. (Reporting and editing by Chris Reese in Bengaluru, Mrinmay dey from Bengaluru)
-
Australia PM announces formal agreement reached with Turkey for COP31 Climate Summit
Anthony Albanese, Australian Prime Minister, said that a formal agreement was reached on Sunday for Turkey to be the host of the COP31 Climate Summit in 2026. This confirms a document published at the COP30 climate summit in Brazil. In a statement released by Germany at the COP30 Summit this week, following a meeting of Western European and Others Group tasked to select the host for 2026, it was stated that Australia would lead the negotiations, while Turkey will take on the role. This announcement followed an earlier one that said a compromise was expected. The agreement ended a long-running dispute over the hosting of U.N. negotiations. Albanese stated in a press release that "a formal agreement was reached for COP31 in Antalya to be hosted and the Pacific's interest would be advanced by Australia taking on the role of the President of Negotiations leading up to the meeting as well as at the event." According to the statement, Australia would be the "exclusive authority" in guiding the decision-making at the summit. The statement also said that the Pacific region will host a pre-COP special meeting to "bring attention to the existential threats climate change poses for the region." The Pacific Islands Forum is a regional diplomatic bloc consisting of 18 countries that had supported Australia's bid. The rising seas threaten several Pacific island nations. Over the years, the annual COP has evolved from a diplomatic gathering into a massive trade show where the host country can promote their economic prospects. Sam McKeith, Sydney; Chris Reese, editing.
-
Tunisians intensify protests against Saied and demand return to democracy
On Saturday, thousands of Tunisians marched through the capital in protest of "injustice" and "repression". They accused President Kais Said of consolidating his one-man regime by using the judiciary. This protest is part of a wave which has been sweeping Tunisia, affecting journalists, doctors and banks, as well as public transport systems. The closure of an environmental-friendly chemical plant was also demanded by thousands. They wore black to show their anger and sorrow over the transformation of Tunisia into "an open-air prison". The protesters held banners that read "Enough of repression", and "No terror, no fear, the streets are the people's". The rally united activists, NGOs, and fragmented political parties across the spectrum to show a rare unity against Saied. This shows the serious political and economic problems in Tunisia and is a challenge for Saied who took power by decree in 2021. The protesters shouted slogans like "We're suffocating!" The protesters chanted slogans such as "Enough with the tyranny! The people want to see the regime fall! ". Ezzedine hazgui, the father of Jawhar Ben Mbark (a politician who is currently in jail), said: "Saied turned the country into 'an open prison. We will never give up." Saied is accused by opposition parties, civil societies and journalists of using the police and judiciary to suppress criticism. Three prominent civil rights organizations announced last month that authorities had suspended their operations due to alleged foreign funding. Amnesty International said that the crackdown against rights groups had reached a critical level with 14 NGOs being targeted for arbitrary arrests and detentions as well as asset freezing, banking restrictions, and suspensions. Saied is accused by his opponents of destroying the independence and integrity of the judiciary. In 2022, he disbanded the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) and fired dozens of judges - a move that rights groups and opposition groups condemned as a coup. The majority of opposition leaders, as well as dozens critics, are currently in prison. Saied says he has not become a dictator and is not using the judiciary to punish opponents. He claims he is purging Tunisia of all "traitors". (Reporting and editing by Kevin Liffey; Tarek Amara)
-
Nine people are killed in Gaza by Israeli airstrikes, doctors say
Local health officials said that Israeli airstrikes on Gaza have killed nine people, and injured several others. This is a test of the fragile ceasefire agreement between Hamas, a militant Palestinian group, and Israel. The first attack, according to witnesses and medics, was on a car that was set alight in the densely-populated Rimal neighborhood. It wasn't immediately clear if the five victims were all passengers in the car, or if they included bystanders. Dozens rushed in to put out the fire and save the victims. Israeli air strikes on two houses near Deir Al-Balah and Nuseirat camps in central Gaza Strip occurred shortly after the attack on a car. At least four people were killed and several more injured. Israeli military claimed that a gunman crossed into Israeli territory in Gaza, exploiting "the humanitarian route in the area where humanitarian aid enters south Gaza", describing it as a "blatant breach of the ceasefire accord". In response, the military announced that it had struck targets in Gaza. Hamas officials in Gaza have rejected Israeli military allegations that the group is committed to the ceasefire. They said the claims were baseless, and an "excuse for killing". Israel and Hamas accuse each other repeatedly of violating a truce that was concluded over six weeks ago. Hamas stated in a press release earlier that day that Israel’s “escalating violations” put the responsibility on mediators, and the U.S., to confront Israel and maintain the ceasefire. The ceasefire of October 10, which ended the two-year Gaza War, has helped to ease the conflict and allowed hundreds of thousands to return to Gaza. Israel has withdrawn troops from city positions and increased aid flow. Violence has not stopped completely. Hamas is trying to assert itself, and many are worried about the de facto division of the territory where conditions are terrible. Palestinian health officials say Israeli forces killed 316 civilians in Gaza in attacks since the ceasefire. Israel claims that three soldiers were killed since the ceasefire was declared and that it has also attacked a number of fighters. Hamas militants attacked southern Israel in October 2023, killing 1,200 people - most of whom were civilians - and taking 251 hostages. Gaza's health officials say that Israel's retaliatory attack has killed over 69,700 Palestinians. Most of them are civilians. Hamas agreed to release all 20 hostages still alive in Gaza, in exchange for Israel's nearly 2,000 Palestinian wartime prisoners and detainees. Hamas has also agreed to exchange the bodies of 360 Palestinian militants who were killed during the war for the remains of 28 hostages. So far, the remains of 25 hostages has been handed over. According to the health ministry of the territory, Israel has returned 330 Palestinian bodies. (Reporting Nidal al-Mughrabi. Emily Rose contributed additional reporting from Jerusalem. Editing was done by Emelia Sithole Matarise and Topra Chopra.
-
The EU objectors to the proposed deal prolong the COP30 discussions
Brazil's COP30 summit was forced to face a crucial day on Saturday after all-night discussions to break an impasse. The European Union had blocked a deal that it felt would not advance efforts to curb greenhouse gases, which are driving global climate changes. The two-week climate conference, billed as an opportunity to demonstrate that nations could still unite to combat climate change in the absence of the United States, was supposed to end on Friday. However the standoff forced the negotiators to work overtime. The Brazilian presidency tried to reach a compromise over a deal which most of the 200 countries attending the summit would accept but the EU deemed unbalanced. A deal must be approved by a majority. It was unlikely that any agreement would be reached to provide more details on the way and when nations will fulfill their commitments to move away from fossil fuels. The Arab Group countries had led the opposition. The only option left was to agree on a voluntary “Global Implementation Accelerator” in which countries can discuss how they could advance their efforts to reduce emissions. On Saturday, a draft of a part of the final agreement, as seen by, called for the global effort to triple the funding available to assist developing nations in adapting to climate change by the year 2035. The EU said it would "move past its comfort zone" in terms of finance for developing countries - but that only if the clauses on actions to reduce planet-warming emission were strengthened. Sources said the COP30 presidency was preparing a text addressing fossil-fuels. However, it was unclear if Brazil was going to issue the declaration or if it had been endorsed by other countries. The deal was not expected as part of a larger consensus after Brazil's earlier attempts to get all the countries to agree on a text regarding fossil fuels failed. Reporting by William James; Editing and editing by Kevin Liffey and Katy Daigle.
-
The EU objectors to the proposed deal prolong the COP30 discussions
Brazil's COP30 Climate Summit faced a crunch-day on Saturday, after all night talks to overcome an impass after the European Union had blocked a deal it claimed would not advance efforts to curb greenhouse gases that are driving global climate changes. The two-week climate conference, billed as an opportunity to demonstrate that nations could still unite to combat climate change in the absence of the United States, was supposed to end on Friday. However the standoff forced the negotiators to work overtime. The Brazilian presidency tried to reach a compromise over a deal which most of the 200 countries attending the summit would accept but the EU deemed unbalanced. A deal must be approved by a majority. It was unlikely that any agreement would be reached to provide more details on the way and when nations will fulfill their commitments to move away from fossil fuels. The Arab Group countries had led the opposition. The only option left was to agree on a voluntary “Global Implementation Accelerator” in which countries can discuss how they could advance their efforts to reduce emissions. On Saturday, a draft of the final agreement, which was part of a draft, called on the world to triple the amount of funding available to assist developing nations in adapting to climate change. The EU said it would "move past its comfort zone" in terms of finance for developing countries - but that only if the clauses to reduce planet-warming emission were strengthened. (Reporting and editing by William James, Katy Daigle, and Kevin Liffey).
-
G20 leaders gather in South Africa to seek agreement despite US boycott
The leaders of the Group of 20 largest economies gathered in South Africa for a summit boycotted by the United States on Saturday. They were seeking a deal over a draft statement drafted without U.S. involvement in a surprising move described by a senior White House Official as "shameful". G20 envoys agreed on a draft declaration of leaders ahead of the weekend's summit in Johannesburg. Several of the main agenda items will be about climate change. Four sources with knowledge of the matter told us on Friday that this draft was drafted without U.S. consent. One of these sources confirmed late Friday that the draft contained references to climate changes, despite objections by the U.S. administration of President Donald Trump who questions the scientific consensus on the warming being caused by human activity. Trump has announced that it will not attend the summit due to allegations that have been widely discredited that the government of the country hosting the summit persecutes the white minority. The U.S. President has also rejected the agenda of the host nation, which included promoting solidarity, helping developing countries adapt to natural disasters and transitioning to clean energy as well as reducing their excessive debt costs. Analysts suggest that the boycott could be beneficial if other countries embrace the agenda of this summit and make progress on a substantive statement. There was no clear indication of what language concessions were needed to bring everyone on board. The United States objected to the mention of renewable energy or climate change in the discussion. Other members were also reticent. Climate change is a major concern for three out of four South Africa's top agenda items. These include preparing for weather-related disasters caused by climate change, financing the switch to green energy and ensuring that the rush for vital minerals benefits the producers. The fourth concern is a system of lending that is more equitable for countries in poverty. Ramaphosa stated that the United States would host the G20 2026. He said he'd have to give the rotating presidency over to a "empty chair". The South African president has refused the White House offer to send a U.S. charge-d'affaires during the G20 handover.
-
Barrick Mining and Mali reach agreement on principle to settle dispute over gold mine
Two sources familiar with this situation said that Barrick Mining has reached a verbal understanding in principle regarding their dispute concerning the Loulo-Gounkoto Gold Mining Complex. Sources claim that no agreement has been signed yet. Barrick Mining's spokesperson did not respond immediately to a comment request. A spokesperson from Mali's Mines Ministry said that negotiations are progressing well, but gave no further details. Since 2023, the two sides are in dispute over the implementation a new Mali Mining Code that increases taxes and gives the Government a larger share of the gold mines. One of the sources stated that they met on Friday for talks, a week following Barrick's interim CEO Mark Hill's letter to Mali administration asking to resume negotiations. One of the sources said that they discussed a 10-year extension to Barrick's mine licence, which expires on February 20, 2026. Source: They also discussed the release four Barrick employees who were arrested in Mali. The source added that they also discussed the return of three metric tons gold that was seized by Mali authorities, as well as the dropping of arbitration proceedings Barrick initiated against Mali. Barrick halted operations at the Loulo-Gounkoto Complex in January. In June, a Malian court appointed a temporary administrator to restart the operations. However, blasting didn't begin until October. (Reporting from Divyarajagopal and PortiaCrowe in Toronto; Additional reporting from Pranav Mathur in Bengaluru, Editing by Edmund Klamann.)
The Supreme Court's top cases
In the current term of the U.S. Supreme Court, there are cases that involve guns, gender affirming medical care for minors who identify as transgender, online pornography and religious rights, TikTok and preventive healthcare. There are also cases involving funding Planned Parenthood, job discrimination and federal regulatory powers over nuclear waste storage, vape products and voting rights.
Take a look at the recent and upcoming cases that the justices will be deciding.
'GHOST GUN' On March 26, the court upheld a federal rule targeting "ghost guns", which are largely untraceable, imposed by former Democratic President Joe Biden in an effort to crackdown on firearms that have been used in crimes across the country. The ruling by 7-2 overturned the lower court decision that the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives exceeded its authority when it issued the 2022 rule targeting the parts and kits of ghost guns. The court found the regulation to be in line with the 1968 federal Gun Control Act.
TRANSGENDER RIGHTS During arguments on 4 December, the court's conservative judges indicated that they were willing to uphold Tennessee's Republican-backed ban on gender affirming medical care for minors who are transgender. This case could have a significant impact on other state laws that target transgender individuals. Biden's Administration appealed the decision of a lower court upholding Tennessee’s ban on medical treatment, including hormones and surgery for minors suffering from gender dysphoria. This refers to the distress caused by the incongruity of a person’s gender identity with the sex assigned at birth. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
MEXICO GUN LAWSUIT On March 4, the justices showed sympathy for a request by two American firearms companies to dismiss the Mexican government’s lawsuit accusing the companies of assisting illegal gun trafficking to the drug cartels, and fueling violence in Mexico's southern neighbor. The justices heard arguments from Smith & Wesson, a firearms manufacturer and distributor of Interstate Arms in their appeal against a lower-court ruling allowing the lawsuit on the basis that Mexico had plausibly alleged the companies aided and facilitated illegal gun sales and harmed its government. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
U.S. TIKTOK BAN On January 17, the justices upheld a federal law that would ban TikTok from the United States if the Chinese parent company ByteDance failed to sell the short video app within a time limit set by Congress. The Justices ruled, 9-0, that the law passed by Congress and signed by Biden last year did not violate First Amendment protections against government abridgment. The justices upheld a lower court decision that had affirmed the measure. Biden's replacement, Republican President Donald Trump chose not to enforce it and instead gave both parties time to work out a compromise.
Online Pornography The Justices heard arguments about whether the First Amendment protects against government interference in speech when a Texas law requires that pornographic sites verify users' ages to limit access by minors. The justices voiced concerns over the availability and accessibility of online pornography, but also expressed concern about burdens placed on adults who wish to view constitutionally-protected material. A trade group representing the adult entertainment industry has appealed the decision of a lower court that upheld the Republican-led State's age verification mandate. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION On February 26, the court heard arguments in a case where a woman claimed that she was denied a job promotion and demoted because of her heterosexuality by an Ohio government agency. The justices seemed to favor making it easier for those from "majority backgrounds" to bring workplace discrimination cases, such as straight or white people. Marlean Amees, the plaintiff, said that she worked with a homosexual supervisor when, in 2019, she was demoted and passed over for promotion to a woman gay. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
RELIGIOUS SCHOOL The court will hear a case that tests the separation between church and state. Two Catholic dioceses are attempting to establish the first taxpayer-funded charter school in Oklahoma. St. Isidore Catholic Virtual School was shut down by a lower court, which ruled that the funding arrangement for the school violated First Amendment restrictions on government endorsements of religion. Arguments will be held on April 30.
RELIGIOUS TASKS EXEMPTIONS A Wisconsin Catholic diocese's arm has filed a request for an exemption from Wisconsin's unemployment insurance taxes. The case could have implications for the constitutional rights of religious people. The Catholic Charities Bureau of the Catholic Diocese of Superior appealed the lower court's rejection of its exemption request. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of the bureau, it could force Wisconsin and other states that have similar tax programs in place to expand their exemptions to conform to the First Amendment protections of the U.S. Constitution. The arguments are scheduled for 31 March.
LGBT SCHOOL BIBLES The court accepted a request from religious parents who wanted to prevent their children from attending classes in a Maryland district public school when LGBT stories are read. This is yet another case that involves the intersection of religion and LGBT rights. Parents of children attending Montgomery County Public Schools filed an appeal after lower courts refused a plaintiff's request for a preliminary order ordering the district not to read these books. Arguments will be held on April 22.
OBAMACARE - PREVENTIVE CARE MANDATES The court will determine the legality of an important component of the Affordable Health Care Act, which gives a taskforce established under the Obamacare healthcare law the power to demand that insurers provide preventive medical services without cost to the patient. The court heard an appeal from the Biden administration against a lower-court ruling which sided with a Christian group of businesses that objected to the fact that their employee health plans covered HIV-preventing medications and had argued the task force structure violated U.S. Constitution. Arguments will be held on April 21.
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FINANCE The court will examine South Carolina's attempt to cut off funding to Planned Parenthood. This case could support conservative states in the U.S. who want to deny Planned Parenthood government money for reproductive healthcare. A lower court barred the Republican state from cutting off funding to Planned Parenthood South Atlantic under the Medicaid insurance program. Arguments will be held on April 2.
NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE On March 5, the justices heard arguments over whether the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had the authority to issue licenses for certain nuclear waste facilities, amid objections raised by the state Texas and oil industry interests. The U.S. Government and a company awarded a license to operate an operation in western Texas by the NRC appealed the ruling of a lower court declaring that the storage arrangement was illegal. The NRC regulates nuclear energy in the United States. The NRC is expected to make a decision by the end June.
FLAVORED vapor products The Court on April 2, largely backed up the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in its refusal to allow two ecigarette companies to sell flavored vapes that regulators deem a risk to health for youths. The court threw out the lower court decision that found the FDA violated a federal law known as the Administrative Procedure Act by rejecting the applications of the companies Triton Distribution & Vapetasia to sell these nicotine-containing items.
EPA AUTHORITY On March 4, the court handed a major blow to the Environmental Protection Agency with a ruling of 5-4. The case involved a wastewater treatment plant owned by San Francisco. This could make it more difficult for regulators and water quality inspectors to monitor pollution. The court ruled that EPA had exceeded its authority in a law against pollution by including vague restrictions on a permit for the facility which discharges into the Pacific Ocean. In recent years, the court has limited the EPA’s power as part of a number of rulings that have curbed the federal regulatory agencies’ powers.
TAILPIPE Emissions A major case that tests the power of the Democratic-ruled state to combat greenhouse gases is a challenge by fuel producers against California's standards on vehicle emissions and electric vehicles under a federal law on air pollution. Valero Energy, along with fuel industry groups, appealed the lower court's decision to reject their challenge against a Biden administration decision to let California set its own regulation. Arguments will be held on April 23.
The Supreme Court is hearing a dispute regarding the legality and operation of the TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERIES FUND, a fund that Congress authorized to be operated by the Federal Communications Commission in order to increase access to telecommunications. The conservative Consumers' Research group and others accused Congress of illegally delegating authority to an independent federal organization. The FCC, along with a coalition including interest groups and telecoms companies, appealed an earlier court decision which found that Congress had violated the Constitution when it gave the FCC the authority to manage the fund. Arguments will be held on March 26.
LOUISIANA ELECTORAL MAP On March 24, the justices heard arguments in a bid to preserve an election map that increased the number of Black-majority districts in the state. This was in response to a legal challenge brought by a group voters who identified themselves as "non African American." Three federal judges determined that the map of Louisiana's six U.S. House of Representatives district - which now has two Black-majority areas, instead of one - violated the Constitutional promise of equal treatment. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
Death Penalty Case On February 25, the court threw away Richard Glossip’s conviction in Oklahoma for a murder-for hire plot that took place in 1997 and gave him a fresh trial. In a 5-3 decision, the justices concluded that prosecutors had violated their constitutional obligation to correct false testimony from their star witness. The justices reversed the lower court decision which had upheld Glossip’s conviction. They also allowed his planned death to proceed despite Glossip’s claim that prosecutors had wrongly withheld information that could have helped his defense. (Compiled by Andrew Chung and John Kruzel; edited by Will Dunham.)
(source: Reuters)