Latest News

G20 Finance Chiefs' Meetings marred by absences and disputes

Some finance ministers did not attend a Group of 20 meeting in South Africa, while other high-ranking officials cut short their trips to the event marred by disagreements over climate change, debt, and inequality.

It has never been easy to agree on a statement for a group that includes China and Russia, as well as the European Union, the United States, and other countries. The differences between the countries are more pronounced than ever before, and some of the finance ministers did not attend because they were preoccupied with their domestic politics.

The finance ministers of many of G20's largest economies, including the U.S. China, Japan India and Canada, cancelled their attendance at the event. It was meant to bring together central bankers and them to discuss global economic issues. The EU's top economic official also did not attend.

Their absence reduced the already small chances of reaching a consensus on a communiqué. It seemed that there was little chance of agreement on the issues that were deemed important by the South African president Cyril Ramaphosa: lack of climate finance from wealthy nations, reforming a financial system which penalizes poor countries, and growing inequalities.

In his opening remarks, he stated that "in this time of global unrest and tensions escalating, it is more important than ever for the G20 members to work together."

"The erosion in multilateralism poses a serious threat to the growth and stability of the global economy."

Lesetja Kganyago of South Africa's Central Bank said that a number recent G20 meetings ended without agreement on any communique. He also stated that it was not a concern that some countries are represented by deputy ministers.

He said that no one was in the room at the time saying, "I am going to bring up this issue but I feel I'm too young so they may ignore it."

Alex van den Heever is a political scientist at University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. He said that the United States' absence from G20 discussions - they also refused to send their top diplomat to the G20 meeting of foreign ministers held last week – "makes [it] very difficult to see what people will do moving forward."

CLIMATE WORMS

South Africa had hoped that the G20 would be a platform to put pressure on rich nations to do more in order to combat climate change and give more money to poorer countries for their transition to green energy, as well as adaptation to worsening conditions.

Ramaphosa stated last week that "those most responsible for climate changes have a responsibility... to support the least responsible".

Kgosientsho RAMOKGOPA, Energy Minister, said on Tuesday, "What the American presidency effectively does is reconfigure (the conversation) (on green power by)... reintroducing aspects we thought were solved."

"Where it goes is anyone's guess," said he, adding that certain countries may reconsider the pace and scale of their transition away from fossil fuels towards green energy.

Others questioned the relevance of the G20 discussions after the G20's largest economy stepped out. Some analysts saw an opportunity to move forward without the U.S.

Daniel Silke of the Political Futures Consultancy said that there could be synergies in large parts of what is left if the U.S. was excluded on certain issues.

It's a chance for South Africa to play a leadership role. (Additional reporting and writing by Tim Cocks and Bernadette and Timothy Heritage; editing by Bernadette and Timothy Heritage).

(source: Reuters)