Latest News

McGeever: Wall Street's immunity against the Mideast oil shock is now being tested.

Wall Street was awash with complacency as oil prices soared by 30% and global stocks fell. Investors are likely to have bet that the turmoil would have a?short-lived and mild economic impact', similar to most crises of recent years. Is it a market inefficient or is this wishful thinking? Soon we'll find out. West Texas?Intermediate Crude rose 35% in the past week. This is the largest weekly increase?since U.S. benchmark oil futures were introduced in 1983. Yet the S&P?500 only fell 2%. The Nasdaq fell just over 1%.

What is going on?

Investors may think that the U.S. has a better chance of coping with an energy shock because it is a net exporter. There could be a lingering belief in "U.S. exceptionalalism". Geopolitical risks are notoriously hard to value, so it's possible that many asset managers simply wait for clarity and sit on their hands.

Whatever the cause, it is possible that this optimism is either misplaced or complacent.

Take a look at this. According to The Kobbeissi Newsletter, a global market newsletter, in the first 41 trading day of 2026 the S&P 500 trading range was only 2.7%. This is based on the difference between daily closing prices. This is the smallest range ever recorded for this period, dating back to 1928. This will be put to the test. Brent and WTI both soared above $100 a barrel on Monday, putting oil on course for its largest daily gain in decades. The prices were up by more than 25% during the?Asian hours of trading, but have since retreated.

Stock markets in other countries have also been shook. The benchmark European, Asian, and emerging markets indices that fell 5-7 % last week are now suffering even more losses. Japan's Nikkei index is down 5% more today. Korea's benchmark index has also fallen.

These countries, however, are net importers of energy, which means they are more vulnerable to historical spikes in the price of oil and gas than the United States. Japan, for instance, imports 90% its energy. 95% of the oil it imports comes from the Middle East.

Can Wall Street still be an outlier

WON'T HISTORY REPEAT ITSSELF? The Middle East conflict is a terrible time for the U.S. economy. The Federal Reserve had set a 2% inflation target, but the rate of inflation was at 3%. Payroll data released on Friday revealed that the U.S. lost 92,000 jobs during February. Fed officials are unable to ignore the growing stench of stagflation. Wall Street, or more likely bond investors, could condemn Jerome Powell and Kevin Warsh if they take a dovish position in the future, risking letting inflation out of hand. They also risk angering the markets if, instead of focusing on price stability and growth, they adopt a hawkish anti-growth stance.

But policy paralysis is also not good. Investors seem to be betting that history will repeat itself. Most recent bouts of geopolitical volatility have been accompanied by a few weeks' mild volatility and then a rapid recovery.

According to research by Parag Thatte at Deutsche Bank, geopolitical events have a negative impact of?around 6-8% over the following three-week period. The markets recover these losses within three more weeks. Larry Adam, Raymond James' chief investment officer, says that the S&P 500 is higher one, three and six months after geopolitical events. JPMorgan analysts claim that a typical scenario for a geopolitical shock is a stock decline of 5-6%, followed by a recovery within a couple weeks.

They wrote that macro-strategists tend to ignore geopolitics and oversimplify their response, saying "just buy the dip". This rule of thumb was true 80% of the times over the past 60 years.

They added, "We believe the current episode of the Iran invasion is a scenario where you buy the dip."

But the drawdowns seem to be getting smaller, and there was hardly a dip on Friday to buy. Now that computers do the trading, are markets becoming smarter and able to see 'through headline noise? Perhaps the 'playbook' of past crises is still relevant. Has complacency taken hold, or is it different this time?

Wall Street futures were down on Monday morning, even though the jury has not yet been seated. A verdict could be coming soon.

The opinions here are those expressed by Jamie McGeever a columnist at. Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.

(source: Reuters)