Latest News

Chevron sees California's fuel stock law raising prices for clients

Chevron said on Tuesday that California's just recently enacted legislation on oil refineries requiring to maintain minimum fuel stocks was flawed, according to a letter sent by the business to state Congress members.

California, the most populous U.S. state, consistently experiences a few of the nation's greatest average gas costs, causing a frequently tense relationship between the state and oil business.

It is geographically isolated from the U.S. Gulf Coast and Midwest refining centers, and need to produce all its own motor fuels or import them from Asia.

In the letter from Andy Walz, president of Chevron's. Downstream, Midstream and Chemicals organization, he stated increasing. regulation on the validation of rate spikes are revenue. spikes was deceptive.

On Oct. 14, California Guv Gavin Newsom signed into. impact ABX2-1, an expense created to avoid fuel supply shortages. in the state and provides regulators at the California Energy. Commission (CEC) higher control over oil refineries running. in the state.

It enables the CEC to enforce refiners to maintain. minimum levels of fuel stocks, and manage required. refinery turn-arounds and upkeep in assessment with labor. and market stakeholders, so regarding minimize the effects of. maintenance-related production losses on fuel prices.

If refineries stop working to comply with the requirements, they. might be fined a minimum of $100,000 per day for each day that. the noncompliance happens.

We contend that implementing a necessary minimum stock. requirement will likely result in two unfavorable outcomes: an. increased frequency and duration of supply shortages, and a. irreversible increase in fuel prices for customers, Chevron's Walz. said in the letter.

Both dangers extend beyond California, which must develop. the requirement for the legislature to proceed with caution, as. policies that raise prices for the state might likewise impact. neighbors in Arizona and Nevada.

Guv Newsom's workplace did not instantly respond to a. request for comment.

(source: Reuters)