Latest News

Market reaction to Rio Tinto’s purchase talks with Glencore

The companies have confirmed that they are in the early stages of talks with Rio Tinto to purchase Glencore. This could result in the creation of the largest mining company in the world, valued at nearly $207 billion.

Investor and analyst reactions to the latest news.

WILSON ASSET MANAGEMENT PORTFOLIO MANAGER JOHN AYOUB, WHOSE FIRM HAS SHARES IN RIO TINTO:

"We are eagerly awaiting more details and comments from both companies, but right now, in our opinion, no premium can be paid at all. Rio is undoubtedly the better company and we should be compensated by using synergies, not just paying for them.

"Coal must be divested in order to gain the support of Australian shareholders." Rio's story has been relatively straightforward, with iron ore and copper being the main players. Aluminium, lithium, and aluminium were added later. Addition of a few other players dilutes the narrative and you'd need to have significant synergies in order to counteract that dilution.

ARGO INVESTMENTS SENIOR PORTFOLIO MANAGER ANDY FORSTER WHOSE FIRM HAS SHARES OF RIO TINTO.

It makes sense, if the terms are fair for both. The culture of both companies is the biggest question. Glencore has a strong trading background and is very results-oriented. Some of these aspects could be beneficial to Rio.

"I hope Rio remains disciplined, but it is sensible to consider deals that can benefit both parties."

ALLAN GRAY'S TIM HILLIER HOLDS SHARES IN RIO TINTO.

There is a chance that Rio could overpay. The price is important, but if the transaction involves a large premium then there's a chance that shareholders could lose some value.

Rio has a pipeline of high-growth internal projects. It is not clear why the company needs to look outside for projects.

RBC ANALYST KANAAN PEKER

"Consensus says they'll get rid of coal. Rio's shareholders in Europe, especially, find it impossible to accept a return of coal.

"I don't believe they should do anything because I think BHP is a better company in terms of growth than Rio/Glencore merged together."

JEFFERIES METAL AND MINING ANATOMISTS:

The structure of a Rio Glencore merger would be complicated. The companies' iron ore and coking coal businesses could be merged into an Australian listed entity. This entity would likely trade with a high valuation if it distributed its strong cash flows through the cycle to Aussie investors via franked?dividends. Base metals business could be listed separately and trade at a higher price than most other miners because of the mix of commodities, asset quality and company growth. This scenario would have a number of tax implications, and be a difficult one to structure.

"Another possible scenario is that Glencore separates coal and sells itself in an all-shares deal to Rio at a significant premium (we wouldn't expect Glencore to be taken out of a no-premium merger). This would dilute Chinalco’s stake in Rio, and could allow Rio to do a large-scale share buyback in the future (similar to BHP's proposal when it attempted to acquire Rio back in 2007/08). This full merger scenario could have substantial synergies in marketing." Reporting by Scott Murdoch and Melanie Burton, both in Sydney; editing by Jamie Freed

(source: Reuters)