Latest News
-
US appellate court pauses on climate rule challenges
Court documents show that a federal appeals court said on Friday it would suspend its consideration of the legal challenges against U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission climate regulations until Wall Street regulators decide whether they will change them or defend them in court. The SEC, under former president Joe Biden adopted rules that required publicly traded companies, led by Republican states, to inform investors about climate risks, emissions, and spending. Republican-led state and an industry group immediately challenged this in court. In March, under Republican President Donald Trump the SEC decided to stop defending this rule. The U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, issued an order Friday saying that the legal challenges would be put on hold to encourage judicial economy because the SEC refused to defend its rule in court, or to say if it intended to modify the rule or scrap it entirely. The order stated that it was the responsibility of the SEC to decide whether the Final Rules would be rescinded or repealed. It also noted that the SEC already had stayed the regulations’ effective date while the legal challenge was ongoing, so a delayed court ruling would not harm. The SEC didn't immediately respond to requests for comment, but in July the agency informed the court that it had no intention of reconsidering the rule and asked the court to continue the case anyway. Reporting by Douglas Gillison, Washington; Editing and proofreading by David Gregorio
-
US EPA proposes to end mandatory greenhouse gas reporting
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a rule on Friday to end the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions by 8,000 facilities. This program, the EPA said, was burdensome for businesses but left the public in the dark about the environmental impact. The agency stated that mandatory collection of GHG emission data is unnecessary as it "is not directly related to potential regulations and has no significant impact on improving the health and environment of humans." KEY QUOTE The Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, according to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, is nothing but bureaucratic red-tape that doesn't improve air quality. BACKGROUND The rule is a response to an executive order that was issued on the first day of President Donald Trump's presidency. It aims to remove barriers to releasing more U.S. Energy, especially fossil fuels. This is just the latest in a long line of regulatory rollbacks that have undone previous U.S. attempts to combat climate changes. Earlier this year, the EPA revealed plans to repeal its "endangerment findings" which allowed it to regulate greenhouse gases from stationary and vehicle sources. The proposal, if finalized, would eliminate reporting obligations for all large facilities, fuel and industrial gas providers, and CO2 injector sites. The Trump administration also announced that it would pull the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Agreement, which requires all countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Key Context The Trump administration also took steps to stop the collection of environmental databases by the EPA and other federal agencies such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA's satellites that monitor greenhouse gases. DETAILS Under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, 47 categories of sources covering 8,000 suppliers and facilities are required to calculate their greenhouse gas emission and submit it annually. The agency will continue to require the submission of data on methane emissions for large oil-and-gas operations that are subject to a charge for waste emissions. (Reporting and editing by Richard Chang; Valerie Volcovici)
-
NATO launches "Eastern Sentry" to strengthen eastern flank following Russian drone incursion
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced that NATO launched on Friday an operation called Eastern Sentry in response to Russian drones entering Polish airspace this week. Rutte said at a NATO press conference in Brussels that "we must make it clear to the world our determination and our capability to defend our territories." He said this while standing next to NATO's top commander U.S. Air Force general Alexus Grynkewich. Rutte stated that NATO was still assessing possible intentions behind the incursion. This led to Polish and NATO allies shooting down drones, the first such action NATO has taken since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. He said that the Russian action was "reckless" and "inacceptable", regardless of whether it was intentional. Russia claimed that its forces were attacking Ukraine when the drones entered the country and they had no intention of hitting any targets in Poland. Warsaw rejected this explanation and said the incursion had been a deliberate attack. FLEXIBLE RESPONSE ALONG EASTERN FLANC Grynkewich stated that Eastern Sentry is designed to be a flexible, integrated operation for bolstering defences along NATO’s entire Eastern flank. This extends from the Baltic States in the north all the way down to Romania and Bulgaria. He said, "Poland's citizens and those from the Alliance in general should feel assured of our swift response this week as well as our important announcement today." NATO has already deployed thousands of troops in Eastern Europe. The number of additional troops involved in this new operation was not specified. The announcement listed a modest amount of new military assets, including two F-16 fighters and a Danish frigate, three Rafale jet fighters from France, and four Eurofighter aircraft from Germany. Grynkewich, however, said that the new operation also aimed to adopt a more flexible strategy to defend the eastern flank in general rather than having static forces dedicated to a specific area. He said: "We will adjust our posture across the eastern flank in a way that keeps the enemy off-guard, while also responding to specific threats when we see them emerge." Reporting by Andrew Gray, Bart Meijer; Writing by Charlotte Van Campenhout, John Irish, Editing by GV de Clercq Alexandra Hudson, Aidan Lewis
-
EU countries delay deal on new climate goal, diplomats say
Three EU diplomats said on Friday that the European Union has shelved its plans to adopt a new target for climate change next week after France and Germany resisted plans to reach a quick agreement. The countries are discussing a legally binding target of reducing net EU greenhouse gas emission by 90% from 1990 levels by 2040. A portion of this will be covered by purchasing foreign carbon credits. According to the European Commission, this will provide investors with certainty and help Europe reach net zero emissions in 2050. Climate change has caused Europe to become the fastest-warming continental in the world, unleashing deadly wildfires and record-breaking heatwaves. The EU is divided on how ambitious it should be when tackling global climate change, while also trying to increase defense spending and support struggling industry. On September 18, EU ministers were to have approved the 2040 target for climate change. Three EU diplomats have said that the ambassadors of EU countries cancelled this plan at a Friday meeting. The ministers said that next week they will discuss the goal of 2040, but any agreement will be discussed with EU leaders before the discussion is concluded. The diplomats asked to remain anonymous when discussing the closed-door discussion. If the EU fails to reach a deal by next week, it could miss the mid-September deadline set by the U.N. for all countries to submit their new climate plans in preparation for the COP30 summit on climate change scheduled for November. Diplomats have said that Denmark, Spain, and the Netherlands all support the 90 percent reduction in emissions target. France, Poland, and Italy, among others, have rejected the goal and asked that it be taken up with the heads of government at their next meeting in October. This could make it more difficult to reach an agreement. EU leaders make decisions in a unanimous manner, unlike ministers. Diplomats are discussing ways to convince sceptical nations, such as covering a larger share of the climate goal with carbon credits or tying a deal to other EU laws, like the carbon border tax or the 2035 phase-out of combustion engine cars. A spokesperson for the Environment Ministry said that Germany supports the goal of cutting emissions by 90%, but believes it is important to have discussions among the government leaders prior to a final deal. (Reporting and additional reporting by Holger Hanen in Berlin.)
-
Poland contradicts Trump by saying that the Russian drone incursions were not a mistake.
Poland rejected Donald Trump's suggestion that Russian drone incursions in its airspace may have been an error, a rare contradiction from one of Washington’s closest European allies. Poland, supported by aircraft from NATO allies, shot down drones on Wednesday that violated its airspace. This is the first time an alliance member has fired during the Russian war in Ukraine. Russia claimed that its forces were attacking Ukraine at the moment and had no intention of hitting any targets in Poland. Trump told Washington reporters on Thursday that it could have been an accident. Donald Tusk, the Polish Prime Minister, responded on X. "We too would wish that the drone strike on Poland was a miscalculation." It wasn't. "We know it." Trump told Fox News in an interview on Friday that he was losing patience with Russian president Vladimir Putin. Germany announced on Friday that it had increased air patrols over Poland after European leaders strongly condemned Russia over the incident. It also summoned Russia's ambassador. On Poland's initiative, the United Nations Security Council would meet Friday to discuss this incident. NATO's top military officials, including its chief, Mark Rutte and Supreme Allied commander Europe Alexus Grynkewich (a U.S. Air Force General), were scheduled to hold a joint press conference on Friday afternoon. Questions about European Defence It is rare for Warsaw to directly contradict Trump. This shows the alarm of Europe at Trump's willingness, in this case, to accept Moscow's version of events. Poland is one of the closest U.S. ally in Europe. The Trump administration has praised Poland for its commitment to greater European military expenditures. Warsaw has described the drone incursions by Russia as an attempt to test the response capabilities of Poland and NATO. The incident this week has raised concerns about NATO's readiness for drone attacks, and the safety of civil aviation in Europe. The European leaders claim that this is yet another demonstration of Moscow's lack of interest in a peace agreement in Ukraine. This comes weeks after Trump met with President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and retracted his demand for Russia to accept a ceasefire immediately. Trump has repeatedly given Moscow deadlines to reach a ceasefire, or else face new sanctions. But he's backed down. This week, European officials are in Washington to coordinate sanctions against Russia with the U.S. government. Previously, such announcements of sanctions were made in tandem. However, this hasn't happened since Trump took office. The U.S. Treasury urged allies in the Group of Seven (G7) and European Union to impose "meaningful" tariffs on Chinese and Indian goods to stop their purchases of Russian crude oil. A G7 emergency finance meeting was convened to discuss ways to increase pressure on Moscow and end the conflict in Ukraine. The EU member states have agreed to extend by six months the existing travel bans, and to freeze bank accounts for individuals and companies in response to the Russian invasion. Dmitry Peskov, Kremlin spokesperson, said that peace negotiations had been halted and "the Europeans" were hindering the peace process. The French announced that they would be deploying three Rafale jet fighters to Poland to protect their airspace, and the Germans said they would increase their commitment to NATO's eastern borders. RUSSIA AND BELARUS HOLD MILITARY ACTIVITIES On Friday, Russia and Belarus began a joint military drill that had been planned for years. The drills took place in both countries as well as in the Baltic Sea and Barents Sea. Peskov dismissed concerns about the exercise abroad, saying that Western European countries suffered from "emotional overload" and that Russia was not a threat. Local Ukrainian prosecutors reported that Russia continued to attack Ukraine and killed three people in Sumy, a region located in northern Ukraine. The regional governor reported that Ukrainian drones had attacked the port of Primorsk in Russia's northwest, setting a fire to both a vessel as well as a pumping station. This was the first drone attack on a major oil and fuel terminal in the country. (Additional reporting from Anna Koper in Warsaw; Anastasiia Melenko in Kyiv; John Irish and Michel Rose, in Paris; Andrea Shalal, in Washington; William James and Marktrevelyan, in London. Writing by Timothy Heritage. Editing by Peter Graff.
-
Russia unveils monument for Ukraine war dead near St Petersburg
On Friday, hundreds of people, including Russian soldiers' relatives, gathered in front of St Petersburg to unveil a memorial for those killed in Ukraine. It was the first time such a memorial had been erected so close to one of Russia’s two largest cities. "A monument is one way to immortalize history." "Now we have a brand new history," Anna Krasnova said, after seeing the statue of two soldiers with guns unveiled at Kudrovo in a commuter city of 60,000. She said that her husband is fighting there and that her brother's name is missing in action. The memorial is unique in its proximity to Moscow and St Petersburg. Similar monuments were erected throughout Russia in the provinces. At the dedication ceremony, Alexander Drozdenko said, "The memory of our people is the most valuable asset we have." "Our cause will prevail, our enemy will be defeated, and we will win." The inscription on the monument, which is located above the figures, does not mention a date nor the location of the battles it honors. The inscription reads: "To the Heroes of the SMO", which is an acronym for Special Military Operation (the official term used by the Kremlin for this conflict). Kirill Drantsov, another spectator, stated that the monument would remind young people how to serve their country. We will not have to explain to anyone why and how we love and defend the Motherland. (Reporting in Kudrovo, writing by Lucy Papachristou).
-
Gold nears all-time high as markets eye Fed rate reduction
Gold prices increased on Friday and remained close to the record highs set earlier in the week. Signs of a weakening U.S. labour market reinforced expectations that the Federal Reserve would deliver its first rate reduction of the year, next week. As of 9:19 am EDT (1319 GMT), spot gold was up by 0.4% to $3,649.54 an ounce. This is still close to the all-time high set on Tuesday of $3,673.95. This week, the metal is up 1.8% and on track for a fourth straight weekly gain. U.S. Gold Futures for December Delivery were up 0.4% to $3,688.10. Daniel Pavilonis is a senior market analyst at RJO Futures. He said that metals are rising because of the longer-term risk of inflation. The recent data that showed a surge in jobless claims last week, while consumer prices rose at their fastest rate in seven months, in August, have shifted expectations in the direction of higher rates. Investors are prioritizing signs that the labor market is weaker than inflation when determining rate expectations. Fed fund futures fully reflect a 25 basis-point cut during the Fed's meeting on September 17, though expectations of a 50-bps increase have eased. UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said: "Given the tailwinds, and after the recent increase in ETF flows (exchange-traded funds), we expect gold to reach $3,900/oz mid next year." Investors value the yellow metal as a hedge to inflation and uncertainty. It has increased 39% this year. China's central banks has asked the public for feedback on its plans to streamline gold import and export regulations by streamlining licensing. Other metals rose as well. Spot silver rose by 1.3%, to $42.08 an ounce. This is a record high for the 14 years. Platinum was up 1.4%, to $1,396.71, and palladium jumped 2.2%, to $1,214.70. All three metals are set to gain weekly. (Reporting and editing by Krishna Chandra Eluri, Sherin Elizabeth Varighese and Sarah Qureshi in Bengaluru).
-
EU brings forward review of 2035 Vehicle Emissions Targets
EU sources confirmed on Friday that the European Commission would review its CO2 emissions targets for 2035 by the end of the year, instead of 2026. This was after the EU's chief executive met with auto executives to discuss their future. The EU set a goal of a reduction of 100% in CO2 emissions by new cars and vans, but auto industry groups said that this was no longer possible. This target is interpreted as the end of internal combustion engines in new vehicles. A member of the team led by Executive Vice President Stephane Sejourne said that the review would focus on vans. Electric vans only account for 8.5% of new vans in the EU. This is about half of the market share for electric vehicles. Details of the new proposal for 2035 are not yet clear. However, it could include biofuels that would be CO2 neutral and could power internal combustion engines as well as plug-in hybrids and range extenders. The Commission will present a proposal for a new category of small electric vehicles that could benefit from a lower tax treatment, and help to meet CO2 reduction targets. (Reporting and Editing by Benoit VanOverstraeten, Joe Bavier, and Charlotte Van Campenhout)
How a Japanese suitor misread politics with U.S. Steel quote, despite warning signs
A month before Nippon Steel found its $15 billion takeover of U.S. Steel was on the edge of being torpedoed by President Joe Biden, the Japanese company received a strong tip that things were taking a turn for the even worse.
On Aug. 1, officials from the effective Committee on Foreign Financial investment in the United States (CFIUS) told representatives of Japan's biggest steelmaker and its U.S. target that the committee had actually determined a potential nationwide security risk, 2 sources familiar with the settlements told Reuters.
CFIUS was worried that the deal could reduce U.S. steel production capability, interfering with critical industries like transport and facilities, the authorities informed the executives in the call, which has actually not previously been reported.
The warning from the U.S. committee - which has the power to block foreign acquisitions on nationwide security premises - must have actually sounded alarm bells at Nippon Steel, which was already battling criticism from a labour union and U.S. political leaders ahead of Nov. 5 elections.
Yet, the Japanese steelmaker hoped it might still win approval for the deal by patiently explaining its business benefits, according to Reuters' interviews with 2 sources with knowledge of the conversations, one company source and a top Nippon Steel executive.
In an Aug. 19 follow-up conference to the Aug. 1 call held at the Treasury Department according to among the sources, the business' agents stressed to CFIUS the financial significance of Nippon Steel's financial investments provided U.S. Steel's. struggling company. They left feeling their case had been. heard, the 2 sources close to the talks told Reuters.
And in an interview on Aug. 28 with Reuters, Nippon Steel's. primary mediator Takahiro Mori expressed self-confidence the offer was. on track. He said he wished to construct a positive long-lasting. relationship with the unions and that he had met around 1,000. people, including many workers, during 5 U.S. check outs because. the offer was revealed in December to describe its economic. benefits.
The political power of the union will weaken. That holds true. now and naturally after the election, he informed Reuters, including. that talks with CFIUS and other U.S. regulators were. advancing. A day later on, Nippon Steel publicly swore to. invest $1.3 billion to recondition U.S. Steel's aging centers.
However on Aug. 31, CFIUS sent out the 2 combining partners a. 17-page letter detailing its issues and giving them just one. organization day to react. Reuters and other media reported last. week that President Joe Biden was poised to eliminate the deal.
U.S. Steel, Nippon Steel and CFIUS did not discuss the. details of process as laid out .
We do not believe this deal produces any nationwide. security concerns, Nippon Steel stated in a declaration, without. elaborating on the negotiations.
U.S. Steel said in a separate declaration that there was no. situation in which it might make necessary financial investments without. the Japanese company: A deal with Nippon Steel is the. best avenue to make sure that U.S. Steel will have the ability to thrive. well into the future.
POLITICAL HOT POTATO
Nippon Steel had attempted to approach the. politically-connected United Steelworkers union (USW) before it. announced it had consented to acquire U.S. Steel, a company based. in the critical swing state of Pennsylvania during an election. year.
On Nov. 20, the Japanese steelmaker requested a meeting with. USW, according to U.S. Steel filings in January. But lawyers for. the American company denied the request, saying the union had. aligned with another suitor and talks would run the risk of breaking the. confidentiality of a competitive bidding process, the filings. stated.
The method backfired.
When Nippon Steel's offer was revealed on Dec. 18, USW. head David McCall knocked the companies for keeping unions in. the dark. In a declaration the very same day, the union leader accused. U.S. Steel of ignoring employees' issues while selling out to. a foreign company.
He urged the U.S. federal government to scrutinise the offer to see. if it served workers and nationwide security interests.
Simply three days after McCall's appeal, Biden's national. economic consultant Lael Brainard said the takeover appeared to. deserve major analysis.
USW declined to comment on the merger process.
In hindsight it was obvious (Nippon Steel) required to get. the union on board but I don't believe they anticipated the union,. and in specific the leader of the union, to get as upset as he. did, said Nick Wall, an M&A partner at Allen & & Overy, who was. not associated with the settlements.
In the weeks after the deal statement, both Biden and his. Republican competing Donald Trump voiced opposition to the merger.
When Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida headed to. Washington DC in April - the very first state go to by a Japanese. leader in nine years - Nippon Steel's acquisition was the. elephant in the room.
McCall and his wife joined VIP guests such as Amazon founder. Jeff Bezos and actor Robert De Niro at a luxurious dinner Biden. scheduled Kishida, listening to live music by singer Paul. Simon. U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel magnates were not on. the list of more than 200 visitors launched by the White Home.
' LISTEN ONLY MODE'
As the political noise around the deal grew louder, Nippon. Steel still believed there was a course forward and that the union. was just attempting to draw out better terms, 2 sources near. the company informed Reuters, asking for privacy due to the. sensitivity of the conversations.
In May, chief mediator Mori informed Reuters he believed that,. as soon as the election was over, the president would evaluate the. financial merits of the deal. Obstructing it could upset one of. America's closest allies and it seemed not likely any. administration would wish to do that, he included.
However that reasoning headed out of the window on August 31, when the. CFIUS letter landed.
The letter argued the transaction presented a risk without. providing any discussion of ways to lighten officials' issues. and gave the celebrations till Sept. 4 to respond, according to the. 2 sources acquainted with the conversations.
In a call on Sept. 1, attorneys dealing with the deal pressed. CFIUS authorities about why they had been offered so little time,. the sources said.
We have actually been advised to be in listen just mode, a CFIUS. official replied, a threatening indication as sources inside the Biden. administration were telling the two companies the White Home. will obstruct the takeover, individuals said.
The companies began frantically drafting an action,. correcting what they perceived as accurate inaccuracies,. proposing mitigation and arguing to conserve the handle a 100-page. letter provided on Sept. 3.
The letter, evaluated , said they anticipated USW to. be more forward-leaning in talks with the companies.
The next day, however, news broke that the White House was. close to announcing Biden was preparing to obstruct the offer.
In the future, this offer will probably be thought about as a. book case of how a service failed to understand politics,. stated David Boling, a former U.S. trade official now at Eurasia. Group.
(source: Reuters)