Latest News
-
US appellate court pauses on climate rule challenges
Court documents show that a federal appeals court said on Friday it would suspend its consideration of the legal challenges against U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission climate regulations until Wall Street regulators decide whether they will change them or defend them in court. The SEC, under former president Joe Biden adopted rules that required publicly traded companies, led by Republican states, to inform investors about climate risks, emissions, and spending. Republican-led state and an industry group immediately challenged this in court. In March, under Republican President Donald Trump the SEC decided to stop defending this rule. The U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, issued an order Friday saying that the legal challenges would be put on hold to encourage judicial economy because the SEC refused to defend its rule in court, or to say if it intended to modify the rule or scrap it entirely. The order stated that it was the responsibility of the SEC to decide whether the Final Rules would be rescinded or repealed. It also noted that the SEC already had stayed the regulations’ effective date while the legal challenge was ongoing, so a delayed court ruling would not harm. The SEC didn't immediately respond to requests for comment, but in July the agency informed the court that it had no intention of reconsidering the rule and asked the court to continue the case anyway. Reporting by Douglas Gillison, Washington; Editing and proofreading by David Gregorio
-
US EPA proposes to end mandatory greenhouse gas reporting
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a rule on Friday to end the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions by 8,000 facilities. This program, the EPA said, was burdensome for businesses but left the public in the dark about the environmental impact. The agency stated that mandatory collection of GHG emission data is unnecessary as it "is not directly related to potential regulations and has no significant impact on improving the health and environment of humans." KEY QUOTE The Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, according to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, is nothing but bureaucratic red-tape that doesn't improve air quality. BACKGROUND The rule is a response to an executive order that was issued on the first day of President Donald Trump's presidency. It aims to remove barriers to releasing more U.S. Energy, especially fossil fuels. This is just the latest in a long line of regulatory rollbacks that have undone previous U.S. attempts to combat climate changes. Earlier this year, the EPA revealed plans to repeal its "endangerment findings" which allowed it to regulate greenhouse gases from stationary and vehicle sources. The proposal, if finalized, would eliminate reporting obligations for all large facilities, fuel and industrial gas providers, and CO2 injector sites. The Trump administration also announced that it would pull the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Agreement, which requires all countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Key Context The Trump administration also took steps to stop the collection of environmental databases by the EPA and other federal agencies such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA's satellites that monitor greenhouse gases. DETAILS Under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, 47 categories of sources covering 8,000 suppliers and facilities are required to calculate their greenhouse gas emission and submit it annually. The agency will continue to require the submission of data on methane emissions for large oil-and-gas operations that are subject to a charge for waste emissions. (Reporting and editing by Richard Chang; Valerie Volcovici)
-
NATO launches "Eastern Sentry" to strengthen eastern flank following Russian drone incursion
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced that NATO launched on Friday an operation called Eastern Sentry in response to Russian drones entering Polish airspace this week. Rutte said at a NATO press conference in Brussels that "we must make it clear to the world our determination and our capability to defend our territories." He said this while standing next to NATO's top commander U.S. Air Force general Alexus Grynkewich. Rutte stated that NATO was still assessing possible intentions behind the incursion. This led to Polish and NATO allies shooting down drones, the first such action NATO has taken since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. He said that the Russian action was "reckless" and "inacceptable", regardless of whether it was intentional. Russia claimed that its forces were attacking Ukraine when the drones entered the country and they had no intention of hitting any targets in Poland. Warsaw rejected this explanation and said the incursion had been a deliberate attack. FLEXIBLE RESPONSE ALONG EASTERN FLANC Grynkewich stated that Eastern Sentry is designed to be a flexible, integrated operation for bolstering defences along NATO’s entire Eastern flank. This extends from the Baltic States in the north all the way down to Romania and Bulgaria. He said, "Poland's citizens and those from the Alliance in general should feel assured of our swift response this week as well as our important announcement today." NATO has already deployed thousands of troops in Eastern Europe. The number of additional troops involved in this new operation was not specified. The announcement listed a modest amount of new military assets, including two F-16 fighters and a Danish frigate, three Rafale jet fighters from France, and four Eurofighter aircraft from Germany. Grynkewich, however, said that the new operation also aimed to adopt a more flexible strategy to defend the eastern flank in general rather than having static forces dedicated to a specific area. He said: "We will adjust our posture across the eastern flank in a way that keeps the enemy off-guard, while also responding to specific threats when we see them emerge." Reporting by Andrew Gray, Bart Meijer; Writing by Charlotte Van Campenhout, John Irish, Editing by GV de Clercq Alexandra Hudson, Aidan Lewis
-
EU countries delay deal on new climate goal, diplomats say
Three EU diplomats said on Friday that the European Union has shelved its plans to adopt a new target for climate change next week after France and Germany resisted plans to reach a quick agreement. The countries are discussing a legally binding target of reducing net EU greenhouse gas emission by 90% from 1990 levels by 2040. A portion of this will be covered by purchasing foreign carbon credits. According to the European Commission, this will provide investors with certainty and help Europe reach net zero emissions in 2050. Climate change has caused Europe to become the fastest-warming continental in the world, unleashing deadly wildfires and record-breaking heatwaves. The EU is divided on how ambitious it should be when tackling global climate change, while also trying to increase defense spending and support struggling industry. On September 18, EU ministers were to have approved the 2040 target for climate change. Three EU diplomats have said that the ambassadors of EU countries cancelled this plan at a Friday meeting. The ministers said that next week they will discuss the goal of 2040, but any agreement will be discussed with EU leaders before the discussion is concluded. The diplomats asked to remain anonymous when discussing the closed-door discussion. If the EU fails to reach a deal by next week, it could miss the mid-September deadline set by the U.N. for all countries to submit their new climate plans in preparation for the COP30 summit on climate change scheduled for November. Diplomats have said that Denmark, Spain, and the Netherlands all support the 90 percent reduction in emissions target. France, Poland, and Italy, among others, have rejected the goal and asked that it be taken up with the heads of government at their next meeting in October. This could make it more difficult to reach an agreement. EU leaders make decisions in a unanimous manner, unlike ministers. Diplomats are discussing ways to convince sceptical nations, such as covering a larger share of the climate goal with carbon credits or tying a deal to other EU laws, like the carbon border tax or the 2035 phase-out of combustion engine cars. A spokesperson for the Environment Ministry said that Germany supports the goal of cutting emissions by 90%, but believes it is important to have discussions among the government leaders prior to a final deal. (Reporting and additional reporting by Holger Hanen in Berlin.)
-
Poland contradicts Trump by saying that the Russian drone incursions were not a mistake.
Poland rejected Donald Trump's suggestion that Russian drone incursions in its airspace may have been an error, a rare contradiction from one of Washington’s closest European allies. Poland, supported by aircraft from NATO allies, shot down drones on Wednesday that violated its airspace. This is the first time an alliance member has fired during the Russian war in Ukraine. Russia claimed that its forces were attacking Ukraine at the moment and had no intention of hitting any targets in Poland. Trump told Washington reporters on Thursday that it could have been an accident. Donald Tusk, the Polish Prime Minister, responded on X. "We too would wish that the drone strike on Poland was a miscalculation." It wasn't. "We know it." Trump told Fox News in an interview on Friday that he was losing patience with Russian president Vladimir Putin. Germany announced on Friday that it had increased air patrols over Poland after European leaders strongly condemned Russia over the incident. It also summoned Russia's ambassador. On Poland's initiative, the United Nations Security Council would meet Friday to discuss this incident. NATO's top military officials, including its chief, Mark Rutte and Supreme Allied commander Europe Alexus Grynkewich (a U.S. Air Force General), were scheduled to hold a joint press conference on Friday afternoon. Questions about European Defence It is rare for Warsaw to directly contradict Trump. This shows the alarm of Europe at Trump's willingness, in this case, to accept Moscow's version of events. Poland is one of the closest U.S. ally in Europe. The Trump administration has praised Poland for its commitment to greater European military expenditures. Warsaw has described the drone incursions by Russia as an attempt to test the response capabilities of Poland and NATO. The incident this week has raised concerns about NATO's readiness for drone attacks, and the safety of civil aviation in Europe. The European leaders claim that this is yet another demonstration of Moscow's lack of interest in a peace agreement in Ukraine. This comes weeks after Trump met with President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and retracted his demand for Russia to accept a ceasefire immediately. Trump has repeatedly given Moscow deadlines to reach a ceasefire, or else face new sanctions. But he's backed down. This week, European officials are in Washington to coordinate sanctions against Russia with the U.S. government. Previously, such announcements of sanctions were made in tandem. However, this hasn't happened since Trump took office. The U.S. Treasury urged allies in the Group of Seven (G7) and European Union to impose "meaningful" tariffs on Chinese and Indian goods to stop their purchases of Russian crude oil. A G7 emergency finance meeting was convened to discuss ways to increase pressure on Moscow and end the conflict in Ukraine. The EU member states have agreed to extend by six months the existing travel bans, and to freeze bank accounts for individuals and companies in response to the Russian invasion. Dmitry Peskov, Kremlin spokesperson, said that peace negotiations had been halted and "the Europeans" were hindering the peace process. The French announced that they would be deploying three Rafale jet fighters to Poland to protect their airspace, and the Germans said they would increase their commitment to NATO's eastern borders. RUSSIA AND BELARUS HOLD MILITARY ACTIVITIES On Friday, Russia and Belarus began a joint military drill that had been planned for years. The drills took place in both countries as well as in the Baltic Sea and Barents Sea. Peskov dismissed concerns about the exercise abroad, saying that Western European countries suffered from "emotional overload" and that Russia was not a threat. Local Ukrainian prosecutors reported that Russia continued to attack Ukraine and killed three people in Sumy, a region located in northern Ukraine. The regional governor reported that Ukrainian drones had attacked the port of Primorsk in Russia's northwest, setting a fire to both a vessel as well as a pumping station. This was the first drone attack on a major oil and fuel terminal in the country. (Additional reporting from Anna Koper in Warsaw; Anastasiia Melenko in Kyiv; John Irish and Michel Rose, in Paris; Andrea Shalal, in Washington; William James and Marktrevelyan, in London. Writing by Timothy Heritage. Editing by Peter Graff.
-
Russia unveils monument for Ukraine war dead near St Petersburg
On Friday, hundreds of people, including Russian soldiers' relatives, gathered in front of St Petersburg to unveil a memorial for those killed in Ukraine. It was the first time such a memorial had been erected so close to one of Russia’s two largest cities. "A monument is one way to immortalize history." "Now we have a brand new history," Anna Krasnova said, after seeing the statue of two soldiers with guns unveiled at Kudrovo in a commuter city of 60,000. She said that her husband is fighting there and that her brother's name is missing in action. The memorial is unique in its proximity to Moscow and St Petersburg. Similar monuments were erected throughout Russia in the provinces. At the dedication ceremony, Alexander Drozdenko said, "The memory of our people is the most valuable asset we have." "Our cause will prevail, our enemy will be defeated, and we will win." The inscription on the monument, which is located above the figures, does not mention a date nor the location of the battles it honors. The inscription reads: "To the Heroes of the SMO", which is an acronym for Special Military Operation (the official term used by the Kremlin for this conflict). Kirill Drantsov, another spectator, stated that the monument would remind young people how to serve their country. We will not have to explain to anyone why and how we love and defend the Motherland. (Reporting in Kudrovo, writing by Lucy Papachristou).
-
Gold nears all-time high as markets eye Fed rate reduction
Gold prices increased on Friday and remained close to the record highs set earlier in the week. Signs of a weakening U.S. labour market reinforced expectations that the Federal Reserve would deliver its first rate reduction of the year, next week. As of 9:19 am EDT (1319 GMT), spot gold was up by 0.4% to $3,649.54 an ounce. This is still close to the all-time high set on Tuesday of $3,673.95. This week, the metal is up 1.8% and on track for a fourth straight weekly gain. U.S. Gold Futures for December Delivery were up 0.4% to $3,688.10. Daniel Pavilonis is a senior market analyst at RJO Futures. He said that metals are rising because of the longer-term risk of inflation. The recent data that showed a surge in jobless claims last week, while consumer prices rose at their fastest rate in seven months, in August, have shifted expectations in the direction of higher rates. Investors are prioritizing signs that the labor market is weaker than inflation when determining rate expectations. Fed fund futures fully reflect a 25 basis-point cut during the Fed's meeting on September 17, though expectations of a 50-bps increase have eased. UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said: "Given the tailwinds, and after the recent increase in ETF flows (exchange-traded funds), we expect gold to reach $3,900/oz mid next year." Investors value the yellow metal as a hedge to inflation and uncertainty. It has increased 39% this year. China's central banks has asked the public for feedback on its plans to streamline gold import and export regulations by streamlining licensing. Other metals rose as well. Spot silver rose by 1.3%, to $42.08 an ounce. This is a record high for the 14 years. Platinum was up 1.4%, to $1,396.71, and palladium jumped 2.2%, to $1,214.70. All three metals are set to gain weekly. (Reporting and editing by Krishna Chandra Eluri, Sherin Elizabeth Varighese and Sarah Qureshi in Bengaluru).
-
EU brings forward review of 2035 Vehicle Emissions Targets
EU sources confirmed on Friday that the European Commission would review its CO2 emissions targets for 2035 by the end of the year, instead of 2026. This was after the EU's chief executive met with auto executives to discuss their future. The EU set a goal of a reduction of 100% in CO2 emissions by new cars and vans, but auto industry groups said that this was no longer possible. This target is interpreted as the end of internal combustion engines in new vehicles. A member of the team led by Executive Vice President Stephane Sejourne said that the review would focus on vans. Electric vans only account for 8.5% of new vans in the EU. This is about half of the market share for electric vehicles. Details of the new proposal for 2035 are not yet clear. However, it could include biofuels that would be CO2 neutral and could power internal combustion engines as well as plug-in hybrids and range extenders. The Commission will present a proposal for a new category of small electric vehicles that could benefit from a lower tax treatment, and help to meet CO2 reduction targets. (Reporting and Editing by Benoit VanOverstraeten, Joe Bavier, and Charlotte Van Campenhout)
INSIGHT-Offshore wind challengers in Australia, Europe lean on US groups for recommendations
Costs Thompson's. battle to stop overseas wind farms was once confined to the small. U.S. state of Rhode Island where he lives. Today, he is part of. a worldwide movement.
In April, Thompson, who is director of the activist group. Green Oceans, got an e-mail from a fellow anti-offshore wind. group more than 10,000 miles (16,000 km) away called Accountable. Future?( Illawarra Chapter). They were searching for guidance on methods. to fight projects off Australia's southeast coast. In August,. he got another demand, this time from French group PIEBIEM. fighting jobs in Brittany.
It's constantly good to know that other people are thinking the. very same method you are, he informed Reuters.
These groups are amongst a dozen or more local activist. companies across the U.S., Europe and Australia who told. Reuters they have started sharing methods, talking points and. other resources in their typical mission to hinder offshore wind. -- an advancement they hope will transform what was as soon as a. disorganized scattering of regional activists into a significantly. sophisticated worldwide network.
Numerous anti-offshore wind groups said they think. federal governments and wind developers, such as Orsted,. Avangrid and Shell, are minimizing the. ecological damage triggered by tasks as they promote the. renewable energy source as an option to environment change.
In most cases, the groups are wanting to anti-offshore wind. activists on the U.S. East Coast for suggestions, citing their years. of success in slowing or cutting the size of significant jobs,. deteriorating public support for the technology, and winning over. conservative politicians like previous President Donald Trump,. whose administration had actually supported offshore wind, today. opposes it virulently as the Republican presidential candidate.
Offshore wind is a nascent market in the U.S. and a secret. pillar of President Joe Biden's plan to fight climate modification. However, plans to install turbines along every U.S. shoreline. have been challenged by skyrocketing costs and supply chain snags and. attracted multiple suits over concerns about the industry's. influence on tourism, property worths, fishing and marine environments.
Reuters reporting reveals how the groups' international cooperation. provides a fresh difficulty to the market as it permits brand-new. opposition groups to quickly take advantage of years of work done by. others. Oftentimes, it also assists to propagate viral,. politically effective, but sometimes false talking points,. consisting of that turbines eliminate threatened whales and not do anything to. sluggish global warming.
It's a substantial problem, and I do not think the industry has actually got. its head around A, what's occurring, and B, what to do about. it, Ben Backwell, CEO of the Worldwide Wind Energy Council, a. Lisbon-based market trade group, said.
Opposition groups say they are just starting.
We wish to go further, for example with joint. statements, and a better media effect, to alert public. opinion, stated Eric Sartori, secretary of PIEBIEM, which in. French mean Maintaining the Environmental Identity of. Southern Brittany and the Islands versus Offshore Wind.
A U.S. West Coast group told Reuters this month it is. starting a national anti-offshore wind company. Other. groups, including Responsible Future (Illawarra Chapter), said. they have actually gone over forming an international coalition, specifically as. the rest of the world steps up attempting to overtake China,. Britain and Germany, the top manufacturers of offshore wind energy.
NURTURED ONLINE
Sartori of PIEBIEM said he initially got in touch with Green Oceans and. another group in Nantucket after seeing images of damaged wind. turbine blades cleaning ashore in Massachusetts this summertime on. social networks platform X.
Sartori said Green Oceans' Thompson helped, consisting of by. supplying him a quote from a U.S. federal government agency recommending. offshore wind has no environment benefit.
That quote - it is prepared for there will be no cumulative. impact on global warming as an outcome of overseas wind jobs. - now appears on PIEBIEM's website next to photos of fiberglass. fragments cluttering Nantucket's coast.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management informed Reuters the quote. belonged to an ecological analysis of a job, which the. second half of the sentence - not present on PIEBIEM's website -. says wind jobs may beneficially add to a wider. mix of actions to minimize future effects from environment. change.
BOEM regularly mentions in its environmental evaluations that wind. power will not change the course of global warming by itself. however can help when combined with other actions.
In other groups, posts vary from hesitation about whether. wind turbines can make it through high winds to worries they will obstruct. ocean views. The most viral, however, is that overseas wind. development threatens whales.
That claim caught fire in the U.S. in early 2023 after. a number of New Jersey and New York groups blamed the industry for a. spate of whale deaths and caught the attention of conservative. media.
The claim is now repeated by challengers around the world,. including in France and Australia.
The U.S. federal government states the claim has no merit, and links. most human-caused whale deaths to vessel strikes and. entanglement in fishing equipment.
A clean energy trade group, American Clean Power. Association, stated it is resolving opposition by working to. communicate the benefits of offshore wind, such as financial. development and energy self-reliance.
False information weakens trust, cultivates confusion, and. divides communities at a time we need more American energy, a. spokesperson for ACP stated.
SPECIALIST SUPPORT
Green Oceans has actually enlisted the assistance of Spanish marine. biologist Josep Lloret, who has actually raised concerns about the. prospective environmental harms of offshore wind in the. Mediterranean Sea, and hosted a talk by Texas-based reporter. Robert Bryce who is skeptical of the renewable energy. transition.
Other groups piggy-back off their work.
Green Oceans ... the charm of them is they have scientists. behind them, so we might look at the documents they are saying are. factual and identify they are peer examined, stated Jenny. Cullen, president of Australia's Responsible Future (Illawarra. Chapter).
It wasn't Charlie down the road using ChatGPT to pull up. BS.
The techniques are currently helping turn an industry that. received little opposition during its early days in Europe. decades ago into a political hot potato.
In New Jersey, where opposition to overseas wind is perhaps. more powerful than in any other U.S. state, support for the industry. stood at 50% late in 2015 from 80% 4 years previously,. according to a poll by Stockton University.
Trump has actually also signed up with the movement, guaranteeing to halt. offshore wind projects if he recovers the presidency in. November.
His administration several years earlier had actually promoted offshore. wind as a part of his America First agenda, and held a record. offshore wind government auction in 2018.
Trump's project did not react to ask for comment.
In Australia, which is a new target for overseas wind. developers, the primary opposition party has actually likewise swung behind the. motion, and public opposition has been growing-- reaching 18%. in September, from 12% a year previously, according to polls from. Freshwater Technique.
In France, meanwhile, a Senate committee in July recommended. cuts to the nation's overseas wind target, arguing the. innovation is pricey and does not have maturity. The nuclear. powerhouse is currently lagging its neighbours on renewable resource. and has fallen back targets set by the European Commission.
In tandem with their successes, groups opposed to offshore. wind have been dogged by allegations they are backed by. conservative interests connected to the nonrenewable fuel source market.
A 2023 study by researchers at Brown University mapped links. in between U.S. groups and conservative think tanks, consisting of a. case in which the Delaware-based Caesar Rodney Institute. supported a claim to block the Vineyard Wind task submitted by. a Nantucket group, ACK4Whales.
Amy DiSibio, a board member of ACK4Whales, said her group is. not partisan and has actually distanced itself from the pro-fossil fuel. believe tank. A New Jersey group, Secure Our Coast NJ, stated the. same.
It takes away from our message, Robin Shaffer, president. of Protect Our Coast NJ, stated in an interview.
(source: Reuters)