Latest News

Analysts' reactions to the US-China Trade Agreement

U.S. commerce secretary Howard Lutnick stated that restrictions on magnets and rare earths should be resolved as a result of a framework for trade and implementation plan reached with China in London.

Li Chenggang, Vice Minister of Commerce in China, said that the two teams agreed to implement their Geneva consensus. They would then take the framework agreed upon back to their respective leaders.

QUOTES:

CHRIS WESTON HEAD OF RESEARCH PEPPERSTONE MELBOURNE

The devil is in the detail, but the lack reaction indicates that this outcome was fully expected.

The Geneva agreement is a good thing, but the fact that there was no reaction on S&P500 Futures and only small movements in CNH and AUD suggests the outcome was expected. Details matter, particularly the amount of rare earths going to the US and the freedom of US chips to go East. But for now, as long as headlines about the talks between the parties are positive, risk assets will be supported.

The reaction of Chinese equity markets could be telling, and I suspect US equity Futures will closely track the developments today.

CAROL KONG CURRENCY STRATEGIST, COMMONWEALTH BBANK OF AUSTRALIAN, SYDNEY

"I believe in this climate...any hints of progress on a possible trade agreement will be beneficial for the markets. Although details are scarce, as long the two parties are in communication, I believe markets will be happy.

"It's going to be hard for both sides and take a very long time before they can reach a comprehensive agreement." This type of comprehensive agreement usually takes years to reach, so I am skeptical that the framework agreed upon at the London meeting will be comprehensive. "Tensions may have de-escalated temporarily, but will escalate in the coming months."

RAY ATTRILL HEAD OF FOREX STRATEGY, NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK SYDNEY

"The devil will be in the detail of what I call a handshake deal and, more importantly, if this can help to reestablish the trust between President Xi, and President Trump which was clearly broken since the Geneva Agreement has been published. It's too early to declare that a new US-China trading agreement is imminent.

"The entire year was littered by positive omens of reaching agreements, but we haven't seen any real progress. Or we've seen a backsliding in things that seemed to be agreed.

"Our view remains that, whatever is agreed upon in the next few weeks and months, we will end up with an international tariff situation that is much worse than it was before Trump became president. We'll still have a tariff climate that we believe is detrimental to global growth."

TONY SYCAMORE MARKET ANALYST IG SYDNEY

If we maintain the terms of the Geneva Agreement we will see US tariffs for Chinese goods remaining at 30% for some time, and Chinese tariffs for US goods remaining at 10%. This is a reduction from 145% and 125%, respectively. This would be amazing.

"Now, that was for me probably the consensus of the market...and now, people are just trying to figure out whether or not they're going to buy or sell US dollars and I think that reflects a little bit of this indecision.

I thought that Geneva would be extended and it appears we are getting what I expected. This is why the U.S. equity market has held up at this time. They still seem overheated and need to take a step back. We've had a great run, and now we're pushing up against our February record highs. For me, I think it's a good idea for them to take some time off. It hasn't been above or below expectations. It's exactly where I expected we would land, and that's the reason I think there's now a bit of uncertainty in US equity futures."

(source: Reuters)