Latest News

Policymakers: Fed should abandon rate-cutting lean due to oil price shock

The Federal Reserve officials who disagreed with this week's statement of policy said that the rising oil prices due to the U.S. supported war against Iran mean the U.S. Central bank officials should make it clear that they cannot continue to lean toward interest rate reductions, due to the uncertainty surrounding the future of the economy and inflation. The Fed's most divided vote since 1992 kept the overnight benchmark?interest rates steady at 3.50% to 3.75% but maintained language that indicated its next likely move would be a cut. This is consistent with the process started about 18 months ago, of lowering high borrowing costs used in order to combat inflation and towards a "neutral" position.

The Fed's target of 2% is still well above inflation, and it has been increasing. With the risks associated with the outcome the war being so high, policymakers are less confident that rates will fall. Some are worried that they might need to increase. The pressures on inflation are still broad, and the rising oil price is a new source.

She said that she no longer considered this easing of bias to be appropriate given the current outlook.

Neel Kazhkari, the Minneapolis Fed president, said that a prolonged closing of the Strait of Hormuz or any further damage done to Middle East energy infrastructure would produce a large price shock. The Fed would then need to "potentially" raise rates to keep inflation expectations under control.

After the Fed's weekly meeting, the lid was lifted on its policy communications.

We would have to respond with a strong response. Federal funds rate hikes, possibly a series, could be justified even at the cost of further "weakness" in the labor market.

The policy statement was approved by 8-4 this week. It repeated the existing language in order to show that the easing bias felt by three voting Fed officials is no longer appropriate. Other non-voting policy committee members are likely in agreement. The fourth dissent was 'in favor of a rate reduction.

MARKET MEASURES OF FUTURE INCREASEMENT EXPECTATIONS ARE ON THE RISE The closure of the Strait of Hormuz - a vital shipping route for the world's supply of energy - and threats to the infrastructure has pushed the price of oil above $100 a barrel for several weeks. It reached $126 this week, compared with $70 when the conflict began two months ago.

According to the AAA group, the average price of gasoline in the United States has risen by almost 10 cents over night to $4.39 per gallon. It was around $3 at late February.

Omair Sharif of Inflation Insights said it was "early days" but that the Fed could be surprised to see that the consumer price index for May is above 4%. This would echo the spike in inflation that occurred after the COVID-19 Pandemic, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine 2022.

Kevin Warsh could face "not only surging energy prices that threaten to spill over into the wider economy, but also rising inflation expectations numbers," Sharif wrote in a Friday article. Donald Trump said that he expected Warsh to deliver rate cuts in a difficult environment.

While Fed officials claim that inflation expectations are stable at the moment, they have seen a sharp rise in expectations of near-term inflation since the start of the war, but their expectations of the rate of inflation over the longer term have increased more modestly.

The market-based measures have also begun to increase.

The yields of 10-year Treasury Inflation Protected Securities have risen by 25 basis points and are the highest they've been since 2023. The rate on 5-year TIPS also increased by roughly the same amount. The 5-year, 5-year-forward rate, which is a measure for expected inflation in five years' time, and the five years following, has risen by about 20 basis points.

Powell said in a press conference after the Fed meeting on Wednesday that inflation dynamics were so fluid, the "center of thinking" among Fed officials was moving away from a statement with an easing bias in favor of a neutral tone, which would open the door for a rate increase. He said this change could happen, depending on the events, at the next policy meeting on June 16-17.

Kashkari, in his Friday statement, pointed out another possible issue with the language of "easing". Kashkari's analysis shows that even in a "benign" scenario, where the Strait of Hormuz is opened relatively soon, the underlying inflation rate in the U.S. will remain at 3%. This would be well above the Central Bank's target, and would allow it to stay unchanged for a long period of time.

(source: Reuters)