Latest News

ICC probes cyberattacks in Ukraine as possible war crimes - sources

Prosecutors at the International Wrongdoer Court (ICC) are investigating alleged Russian cyberattacks on Ukrainian civilian facilities as possible war crimes, 4 sources knowledgeable about the case have told .

It is the first verification that attacks in the online world are being investigated by worldwide prosecutors, which could result in apprehend warrants if adequate evidence is gathered.

The probe is analyzing attacks on infrastructure that threatened lives by disrupting power and water materials, cutting connections to emergency situation responders or knocking out mobile data services that transfer air raid warnings, one official stated.

ICC district attorneys are working alongside Ukrainian groups to examine cyberattacks committed from the start of the full-blown invasion in February 2022, stated the authorities, who declined to be called due to the fact that the probe is not finished.

2 other sources near the ICC district attorney's workplace confirmed they were checking out cyberattacks in Ukraine and said they could go back as far as 2015, the year after Russia's. seizure and unilateral annexation of the Crimean Peninsula from. Ukraine.

Moscow has actually formerly denied that it performs. cyberattacks, and officials have actually cast such allegations as. efforts to prompt anti-Russian sentiment.

Ukraine is gathering proof to support the ICC. prosecutor's investigation.

The ICC district attorney's office decreased to discuss Friday,. but has previously said it has jurisdiction to examine. cybercrimes. It has likewise said it can not talk about matters. associated to ongoing examinations.

RUSSIANS IMPLICATED OF CRIMES AGAINST MANKIND

The court has actually released 4 arrest warrants versus senior. Russian suspects considering that the beginning of the intrusion. These. include President Vladimir Putin, presumed of a war criminal activity over. the deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia.

Russia, which is not a member of the ICC, dismissed that. decision as null and void. Ukraine is also not a member, but. has actually granted the ICC jurisdiction to prosecute criminal activities committed. on its territory.

In April, a pre-trial chamber provided arrest warrants. declaring that two Russian leaders had actually dedicated criminal offenses. against humankind with strikes versus civilian facilities. The Russian defence ministry did not respond to an ask for. remark at the time.

A minimum of four significant attacks on energy infrastructure are. being analyzed, two sources with knowledge of the examination. informed .

A senior source stated one group of Russian hackers in the. ICC's crosshairs is known in cybersecurity research circles as. Sandworm, and is thought by Ukrainian authorities and cyber. specialists to be linked to Russian military intelligence.

The group is presumed of a string of high-profile. cyberattacks, including the successful 2015 attack on a power. grid in western Ukraine-- among the first of its kind,. according to cybersecurity researchers.

A group of activist hackers calling themselves Solntsepyok. ( hot spot) claimed responsibility for a major attack on the. Ukrainian mobile telecoms provider Kyivstar last Dec. 12. Ukrainian security services identified that group as a front. for Sandworm.

Sandworm is likewise thought by Kyiv to have performed. substantial cyberespionage against Western governments on behalf. of Russia's intelligence agencies.

CAN A CYBERATTACK BE A WAR CRIME?

Cyberattacks that target industrial control systems, the. technology that underpins much of the world's industrial. facilities, are rare, but Russia is one of a small club of. countries that have the methods to do so, the cybersecurity. scientists said.

The ICC case, which could set a precedent for global. law, is being carefully followed.

The body of international law covering armed conflict,. preserved in the Geneva Conventions, bans attacks on civilian. objects, but there is no generally accepted meaning of what. makes up a cyber war crime.

Legal scholars in 2017 drafted a handbook called the Tallinn. Handbook on the application of global law to cyberwarfare. and cyber operations.

However experts spoken with state it is uncertain whether. data itself can be considered the item of an attack banned. under international humanitarian law, and whether its. damage, which could be devastating for civilians, can be a. war criminal activity.

If the court handles this issue, that would develop fantastic. clearness for us, stated Professor Michael Schmitt of the. University of Reading, who leads the Tallinn Handbook process.

Schmitt thinks that the hack of Kyivstar, owned by the. Dutch business Veon, meets the criteria to be defined as a war. crime.

You always look at the foreseeable repercussions of your. operation. And, you understand, that was a foreseeable consequence. that placed humans at danger.

Ukraine's intelligence firm stated it had actually supplied details. of the event to ICC detectives in The Hague. Kyivstar stated. it was analysing the attack in collaboration with international. suppliers and the SBU, Ukraine's intelligence company.

(source: Reuters)