Latest News

India rejects US claim of excess capacity in textiles and steel

India rejects US claim of excess capacity in textiles and steel
India rejects US claim of excess capacity in textiles and steel

Amitabh Kumra, a trade official in India, said that India did not have'surplus manufacturing capacity' in textiles and steel as claimed in the Section 301 investigation by the U.S. Trade Representative.

Washington has cited structural surplus capacity in Indian industries, from solar panels and petrochemicals, to steel and textiles. It also cites its $42 billion goods trade deficit with the United States by 2025.

Kumar, India's Additional Trade Secretary, said that its textile and Steel output should be evaluated in relation to the size of its population, its domestic demand, and its growth needs rather than its absolute production.

"Overcapacity" is a matter of perspective. Kumar stated that they did not believe there was any overcapacity.

He added that India's textile consumption per capita was low, especially for?man-made fiber and technical items.

This country has a tropical climate. We wear cotton. "How can we have an overcapacity?"

Kumar rejected U.S. concerns about?steel production, saying India's requirements reflected the country's development.

He said that India's per capita consumption of steel is one of the lowest in the world. The output remains low compared to the population and growth requirements.

Analysts say Washington uses the threat of Section 301 Tariffs to pressure India to increase its purchases of U.S. energy products and defence goods, and to open up their markets to agricultural products and other products.

New Delhi wants a deal with the United States that would include preferential tariffs for competitors. However, the negotiations have been clouded due to the uncertainty surrounding the U.S. investigation against India.

In March, the USTR office launched investigations against India among 16 other countries for policies like subsidies, state funding and industrial planning which 'let factories continue producing even when market conditions were not supportive.

The U.S. has proposed an additional 12.5% tariff on imports of goods from India, and other countries. They cite their?uses of forced labour. India, however, says that these are not final as?New Delhi engages Washington in the Section 301 Process.

USTR also considers a separate tariff against India. It claims that there is excess capacity in certain sectors, such as textiles, and exports hurt the U.S. industrial sector.

Kumar claimed that the move was aimed at "a particular country" while also serving to further other commercial goals.

The Trade Minister Piyush Goyal stated last week that both sides are moving quickly to finalise the first tranche of an agreement on trade, possibly as early as mid-July. (Reporting and writing by Manoj Kumra; editing by YPrajesh, Clarence Fernandez and Sakshi Dayal)

(source: Reuters)