Latest News

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to stop briefly cases as it reassesses policy

President Donald Trump's. administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday to place on. hold prepared arguments in a quote by fuel manufacturers to challenge. California's requirements for car emissions and electric vehicles. under a federal air pollution law. The brand-new Republican politician administration likewise made similar demands in. three other cases involving the actions of federal firms,. providing an early indication that it will take a fresh look at a. variety of legal concerns before the court and possibly change. positions from Trump's Democratic predecessor Joe Biden.

The anticipated modifications in the federal government's position might be a. closer ideological fit for the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative. majority, which includes three justices appointed by Trump.

The dispute over California car standards centers on an. exception granted to that state in 2022 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency during Biden's presidency to. national vehicle emission standards set by the agency under the. landmark Clean Air Act anti-pollution law.

Though states and towns are generally preempted. from enacting their own limitations, Congress let the EPA waive the. preemption rule to enable California to set specific policies. that are stricter than federal requirements.

In asking the Supreme Court to stop briefly the case, Performing. Solicitor General Sarah Harris said in a filing, After the. modification in administration, EPA's acting administrator has. figured out that the firm needs to reassess the basis for and. stability of the 2022 reinstatement decision.

The EPA's action renewed a waiver for California to set. its own tailpipe emissions limitations and zero-emission car. mandate through 2025, reversing a 2019 decision throughout Trump's. initially term in office rescinding the waiver.

Valero's Diamond Alternative Energy and related. groups challenged the reinstatement of California's waiver,. arguing that the choice exceeded the EPA's power under the. Clean Air Act and inflicted damage on their bottom line by. decreasing demand for liquid fuels.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Circuit threw out the suits, finding that Valero and the. states lacked the required legal standing to bring their. claims.

Harrison told the Supreme Court that the EPA's reassessment. of the matter could prevent the requirement for this court to. identify whether the challengers have legal standing.

The Supreme Court has actually taken a hesitant view towards. expansive authority for federal regulative agencies, and has. restricted the powers of the EPA in some crucial judgments in. recent years. In June, the court obstructed the EPA's Great Next-door neighbor guideline intended. at decreasing ozone emissions that may get worse air contamination in. surrounding states. In 2023, the court hobbled the EPA's power. to protect wetlands and battle water pollution. In 2022, it. enforced limitations on the firm's authority under the Clean Air Act. to decrease coal- and gas-fired power plant carbon emissions. On Monday, his very first day back in workplace, Trump said in an. executive order that he was looking for the repeal of a new waiver. approved to California in December by the EPA enabling the state. to end the sale of gasoline-only automobiles by 2035. That guideline has. been adopted by 11 other states.

Trump said the EPA must terminate where suitable,. state emissions waivers that operate to limit sales of. gasoline-powered vehicles.

(source: Reuters)