Latest News

EU red tape reductions leave businesses wanting more

EU red tape reductions leave businesses wanting more

RHI Magnesita, an Austrian manufacturer, spends around 1 million Euros of its annual earnings of 400 million Euros to ensure it adheres to EU rules for corporate sustainability. It says that a first wave of reforms aimed at removing layers of red-tape will not reduce this bill.

RHI Magnesita, a large company, is frustrated by the European Union's 52 page 'Simplification Omnibus,' which exempts smaller companies from reporting sustainability and reduces obligations regarding supply chain transparency.

The reforms are billed as an effort to eliminate layers of bureaucracy which cost European businesses money and time, and put them at a competitive disadvantage with cheaper competitors in China and the U.S.

Stefan Borgas, RHI Magnesita chief executive, said: "At first glance, it looks like not much has changed."

RHI Magnesita said it conducted an additional audit and employed three or four full time employees to collect the data required by EU law which requires companies to report more than 1,000 sustainability data point.

The global business of the firm spans 65 production locations and employs 20,000 people. In 2024, the company reported adjusted earnings (before tax, interest and amortization) of 407 millions euros.

The proposals of February were part of an EU reform package aimed at improving the competitiveness of Europe and encouraging industries to decarbonise.

At a summit held in Brussels, the EU leaders discussed future rounds of reforms. They published a statement in which they asked the Commission to focus on rules relating to industrial decarbonisation as well as defence.

Businesses with fewer than 1000 employees will be relieved by the European Commission's plans to reduce sustainability rules. The European Commission estimates that companies will save 4,77 billion euros per year.

The Commission estimates that the proposed changes in supply chain transparency regulations would reduce the estimated annual compliance cost of 480,000 euro for the largest companies by more than half.

Still, big business remains unconvinced. The AFEP, a group made up of the 118 largest private companies in France, said that the proposals did not "correct the bureaucratic load" on larger businesses.

Gwenaelle Avice Huet is the Europe director of French blue-chip Schneider Electric. With annual revenues of over 38 billion euros, she said that big companies "have been a bit left aside". She did, however, welcome the decision to scrap plans for more specific reporting by sector.

Huet replied, "At the very least, this one was postponed." But this is minimal. "We aren't discussing simplification."

DIFFERENCES OVER DEREGULATION

Deregulation is not a universally popular idea. Opponents claim that it will reduce corporate accountability, and make it harder for large companies to address issues such as human rights and the environment. Investors say that the changes will make it more difficult to decide how to invest money to reach the EU's climate goals.

Borgas, the boss of RHI Magnesita, said that the time and cost involved in fulfilling the obligations for the manufacturer of fireproof materials are resources "that we cannot invest" to reduce CO2 emissions.

Some European commissioners are beginning to realize that excessive bureaucracy is hurting their competitiveness, even though the EU maintains its commitment to achieving net zero emissions and other climate goals.

Before the proposed changes, Stephane Sejourne, the industry chief at the European Commission, spoke of the impact of the sustainability laws. "We realized that we had created an entire economy around them with new companies, specialists and consulting firms," he said.

BusinessEurope, a European industry group, said that its members were expecting the U.S. to pursue a 'deregulation agenda.' This would divert investment from Europe.

Additional'simplification packages' for autos, farming and regulations are currently in the works.

One senior EU diplomat said, "In a sense, this proposal opens up the possibility of more wish lists."

There are still deep divisions among European legislators, who must approve the proposals. The earlier proposals would have further loosened rules and exempted more companies. EU officials said that they were altered after some commissioners pushed back.

Others say that Brussels is not the only culprit for red tape. Radan Kanev of the European People's Party, a Bulgarian EU legislator, said that much of the red tape was due to national governments not properly implementing EU regulations, resulting in layers of bureaucracy overlapping between the EU, the national government and the regional level.

According to a 2024 report by Columbia Business School and New York University Shanghai, the cost of redtape varies greatly between EU countries. It ranges from 0.1% GDP in Austria to 3.9% GDP in France.

Kanev stated that the problem is "so deeply rooted in what goes on within our national bureaucracies, I am afraid it is not easily solved." ($1 = 0.9218 euro) (Reporting and editing by Richard Lough, Elaine Hardcastle and Richard Lough)

(source: Reuters)