Latest News

US sources claim that the US has moved away from critical minerals price floors

Multiple sources have confirmed that the Trump administration has backed away from its plans to guarantee a price minimum for U.S. vital minerals projects. This is a tacit acknowledgement of a lack in congressional funding as well as the difficulty of setting "market pricing".

This shift comes at a time when a U.S. Senate Committee is reviewing a price ceiling extended to MP Materials in the past year. It represents a change from what was promised to industry. Washington could be a step behind other G7 countries who are discussing joint price support measures or similar measures to boost production of minerals critical to electric vehicles, semiconductors and consumer electronics.

Three attendees said that two senior Trump officials informed U.S. mineral executives at a closed-door event hosted by a Washington Think Tank this month that their projects must prove their financial independence, without government price assistance.

Audrey Robertson, Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy and Head of its Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation told the executives that Audrey Robertson was not there to support them. "Don't expect that from us."

Rare Australian Earth Shares Slide

The price floor set by the MP is not affected.

Robertson was joined in the meeting by Joshua Kroon. He is the deputy assistant secretary for textiles and consumer goods as well as materials, metals, critical minerals, and other materials at the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration.

Sources claim that Kroon and Robertson informed the meeting Washington was no longer able to provide price floors.

In a statement issued after the publication of the story, the Energy Department stated that the article contained "false information and relied on sources who are either misinformed or intentionally misleading." However, the statement did not specify what errors it claimed to have found. The Energy Department did not respond immediately to a request for more information.

MP Materials didn't respond to an emailed comment request, but in a tweet after the article was published they said that there had not been any changes to their contract or the government obligations around it. It said that any implication the U.S. Government has reneged on its commitments towards MP Materials was false.

I did not imply that the MP's agreement was at risk.

The report today is inaccurate, false, and contradictory with the facts. The company stated that the report follows a pattern involving speculative, misleading reporting which has misrepresented government policy repeatedly and caused "unnecessary" confusion in the market.

Kroon and Robertson have not responded to any requests for comments.

After the article was published, shares of Australian listed rare earths companies fell, and at one point, Lynas Rare Earths - the largest company outside China - dropped by more than 10%. Lynas' spokesperson claimed that the company had benefited from the U.S. policy change, which has boosted rare earths prices.

Price protection is important for producers who are currently in business, because it addresses the market's dysfunction immediately. She said that other policy instruments were available and had been used for early-stage projects.

Reg Spencer, an analyst at Canaccord in Sydney, believes that the steep fall for shares related to rare earths was exaggerated.

The comments were in line with his interpretation of White House policy, which is that the White House does not intend to support every rare earths project by using a floor price mechanism. Projects will be developed on their merits," said he.

The U.S. continues to support the development of a critical minerals supply chain in ex-China. He added that they may use different methods.

Change in Tack

The current administration stance contrasts with a closed door meeting held in late July where two officials told separate minerals executives that an MP Materials floor price granted days earlier was "not one-off", and that the administration is working on other price support projects.

Since then, the administration took equity positions in Lithium Americas and other companies, including USA Rare Earth, Trilogy Metals and USA Rare Earth. There were no price floors offered, which raised questions about the government’s commitment to this financial tool.

U.S. mining companies and processing firms have sought price floor and other government protections in order to compete with China. Industry executives claim that China's state producers can cut prices to punish competitors, undermine projects, and discourage private investment.

The White House has declined to confirm whether it intends to set new price floors. However, it said that it would continue to pursue tax cuts, deregulation and targeted investments for high priority sectors "while being responsible stewards" of taxpayer dollars.

Price floors are criticized by critics who warn that they expose U.S. tax payers to significant financial risks. They say the government is forced to subsidise minerals when prices drop, and this could lock in liabilities for a long time if prices continue to fall.

Legal experts warn that guaranteeing a minimum price could be challenged under U.S. budget, procurement and trade laws. This is especially true if the support is viewed as a market distortion, or if it lacks an explicit congressional approval.

Washington can still take other measures to support mineral projects and stabilize prices. These include stockpiling and equity investments, as well as local content requirements.

Australia and other countries have also looked at price floors for critical mineral.

MP?DEAL UNDER THE SPOTLIGHT

Two additional sources said that the MP Materials investment caused concern among some administration officials and Congress members, who were concerned that Congress had not authorized funding for a floor price of at least $10 per kg for 2 types of rare Earths.

Since the MP investment, the economics of the mineral markets have changed. USA Rare Earth announced this week that it plans to purchase the same types of rare Earths on the open markets for $125 per kilogram.

The MP investment included a guarantee purchase agreement. This caused confusion about whether Washington would guarantee price floors for others.

Sources said that as the Trump administration looked at other equity investments it could make after MP, they realized it didn't have the authority from Congress to fund a floor price.

According to two sources, this realization was partly triggered by an inquiry made by members of the Senate Armed Services Committee. They asked Pentagon staff to meet last year in order to explain why MP Materials had received support for a price floor and the administration's investment strategy in the minerals sector.

The committee member confirmed the request for a meeting but declined to comment further.

(source: Reuters)