Latest News

Senate to scrutinize top EPA nominees over plans to undo climate findings

Senate to scrutinize top EPA nominees over plans to undo climate findings

On Wednesday, two Trump nominees for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to lead its deregulatory effort faced questions from senators about the agency's plan to eliminate the basis of greenhouse gas emission regulations.

The question is whether or not the agency will unwind its 2009 "endangerment findings", which paved the way for regulating greenhouse gas emissions under the U.S. Clean Air Act. This finding also formed the basis of numerous EPA climate regulations, such as those on power plants and vehicle exhaust fumes.

According to two sources with knowledge of the situation, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin recommended to the White House that they try to reverse the findings. The EPA confirmed that there was a report, but refused to disclose any details.

The Senate Environment Committee on Wednesday weighed in on the confirmation of Aaron Szabo as the EPA's Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation and David Fotouhi as deputy administrator – two key roles which would lead any effort to undo the endangerment findings.

As EPA General Counsel during the first Trump Administration, Fotouhi did not seek to reverse the endangerment findings despite industry opposition.

Sheldon Whitehouse, ranking member of the Senate committee, pressed Szabo about his role in advising Project 2025. This conservative policy blueprint has influenced many of Trump's policies. He also asked if he would implement these recommendations at EPA. Project 2025 called on the undoing of the endangerment ruling.

Szabo stated, "I am open to any group's ideas." "I am open-minded to all ideas."

CLIMATE FOCUS

The Democratic Senators asked the two nominees for a clear statement of their position on the effect of greenhouse gas emission on the atmosphere, and the role that fossil fuels have in exacerbating the climate change.

Szabo refused to answer whether fossil fuels worsen climate change and rebuffed insinuations his former work as a fossil fuel lobbyist affects his judgement.

California Senator Adam Schiff asked Szabo if the EPA should lower greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuels. He said Szabo had "difficulty giving a clear answer".

Does the oil industry have such a large influence on your policy in dealing with climate changes that you are unable to answer this question? He asked.

Szabo replied, "No," and I was curious to know if you were insinuating I was somehow under the oil and gas industries influence.

Szabo did not respond to the question of whether climate change was a factor in California's wildfires. He said that "there are a number of reasons why wildfires occur on their own."

In a case from 2007, Massachusetts v. EPA ruled that greenhouse gasses are air pollutants that fall under the Clean Air Act. EPA is required to issue a determination that the presence of greenhouse gases in the air endangers public health and environment.

The EPA, under the former president Barack Obama, finalized this finding in 2009. And the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act – former President Joe Biden’s signature climate legislation – codified language deeming that greenhouse gases are air pollution.

The Edison Electric Institute (a utility trade group) declined to comment on possible plans to rollback the endangerment findings but referred to a legal brief from 2022 in which the industry "has come to rely on EPA’s authority" to control greenhouse gases.

Brian Weiss, a spokesperson for the Alliance For Automotive Innovation, said that its members had not yet expressed their opinion on whether or not the endangerment ruling should be reversed.

Zeldin, a New York congressman, stated in his Senate confirmation hearing, that the endangerment findings gives EPA the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, but the agency is not obligated to.

(source: Reuters)