Latest News

Only 35 complaints of debanking are based on political bias, despite Trump's order

A review of data from the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau shows that less than 1 percent of customers who complained about the closure of their checking or savings accounts in the past 13 years said the banks acted for political or religion reasons. This is despite the White House mounting a campaign against "systemic abuses" of the financial system, which it claims have wronged conservatives. After citing what Trump termed discrimination against conservatives, U.S. president Donald Trump signed an executive directive earlier this month requiring banks to not discriminate on the basis of political or religious beliefs. This practice is known as debanking. The White House stated that the order targeted "systemic abuses of financial institutions which undermine free expression and economic opportunities." Few customers denied banking products have cited their political affiliations as the main concern. A review shows that only 35 of the 8,361 detailed bank account complaints filed with the CFPB, since 2012, include terms like "politics", "religion", "conservative", or "Christian".

"It isn't a real problem." Amanda Jackson, director of Americans for Financial Reform (a coalition of progressive groups), said that 'debanking' was an excuse for political attack. Other groups and the group say that the bigger issue is ensuring that U.S. Banks provide services to lower-income consumers. Financial institutions say that they have balanced fair access and steps to combat fraud with steps to combat the wave. They have also said that they haven't cut off customers because of their political beliefs.

Rachel Cauley is the communications director of the White House Office of Management and Budget. Russell Vought, the Office's leader, is also the acting director of the CFPB. She did not answer questions directly about the low number of complaints. She reiterated that the Trump family, and others, were denied banking services because of their political or religious beliefs.

Cauley argued that the actions amounted to an "Orwellian censorship technique which is antithetical to American life." The Trump Administration believes that access to the financial systems is a right of all Americans.

The CFPB does not identify the filer. Although none of the 35 complaints included proof that the accounts were closed due to political or religious motives, the complainants said that they suspected this.

According to a complaint filed in 2023 against JPMorgan regarding account closures, "I believe that this is discriminatory action based on race or religion and/or political beliefs."

Lauren Bianchi from JPMorgan said in an email: "We don't close accounts for religious or political reasons." She said that the bank is in favor of a ban on account closures due to political or religious motives, as well as for regulators allowing more transparency. Brian Knight, senior attorney for Alliance Defending Freedom - a Christian law office that supports Trump's executive orders - said the low number of complaints citing religion or politics could be due to the fact that banks do not have to provide much information to their customers.

Knight stated that "there's no mechanism for information sharing" other than litigation to force the banks to be more transparent about their thinking. (Reporting and editing by Dawn Kopecki, Andrea Ricci, and Ross Kerber)

(source: Reuters)