Latest News

Cotton certifier used by Inditex, H&M discovers no proof Brazil farms breached requirements

A group which licenses sustainability and working practice requirements on cotton used by Zara owner Inditex stated on Tuesday an independent audit had found no breaches by three Brazilian farms accused by an NGO of deforestation and landgrabbing.

The allegations by Earthsight versus Better Cotton had raised concerns for firms such as Inditex and H&M. after the NGO said they were utilizing some cotton from the. farms, bought through suppliers in Asia, in their items.

Inditex had asked Geneva-based Better Cotton, the world's. largest certifier of more sustainably farmed cotton, for clearness. on its certification process and development on its traceability. practices, in action to details got from Earthsight.

Quick fashion retailers deal with pressure from customers and. activists to offer items with less ecological effect.

Better Cotton, which was developed by companies and a number of. non-profit groups consisting of the World Wildlife Fund, states it. goals to support improved practices in areas such as water and. soil stewardship and to promote much better working requirements.

The group said that an independent audit by advisory firm. Peterson discovered that three farms in the state of Bahia, which. were accredited to sell Better Cotton, had not breached its. requirements and would not be suspended.

Inditex declined to talk about the results of the audit,. which were published by Better Cotton on Tuesday.

H&M told it remains in close dialogue with Better Cotton. to follow the results of the investigation and get more. understanding of its action plan.

Together with other brand members, we are engaging with. Better Cotton in discussions to more enhance their. basic, H&M stated.

Better Cotton stated the audit by Peterson had concluded that. a review of satellite images validated that the 3 farms had. not contributed to deforestation given that a minimum of 2008.

Alan McClay, Better Cotton's chief executive, told . that the audit found no proof of non-compliance by the three. farms and no legal cases involving them considering that 2008.

Better Cotton stated it was now thinking about performing. direct due diligence on big corporate owners of cotton farms. given the wider effect of these services.

We have a chance and most likely a responsibility now to. improve that due diligence and to strengthen it, stated McClay,. adding that some business might be at threat of losing their. licences if they do not stay up to date with progressing standards.

Better Cotton's strategic partner in Brazil gave the farms. their cotton accreditation, which the group acknowledges as an. comparable standard, he stated. Brazil contributes about 40% of. the cotton accredited by Better Cotton.

The focus of the investigation was on farms owned by SLC. Agricola and Horita Group companies, Better Cotton said.

SLC Agricola told it stays completely readily available to. team up with any brand-new verification that might be necessary.

Horita Group invited the outcome of the Peterson audit,. which it said was in reaction to unfounded accusations.

We concur with the audit's conclusion and are open to. execute the improvements that have been proposed. We continue. to strive for transparency, the primary value of governance that. we embrace in our group, Horita said in an emailed declaration.

Abrapa, the Brazilian Cotton Growers Association, said in a. statement it is evaluating with Better Cotton the auditor's. recommendations to help make requirements more robust and increase the. reliability of certification.

(source: Reuters)