Latest News

Mike Dolan: Trump reopens Fed fight at critical moment for bond markets

Kevin Warsh, Federal Reserve chair, has been fighting to keep the central banks out of politics. Last week, any hope that U.S. president Donald Trump would grant him breathing space evaporated when the White House targeted Fed governor Lisa Cook. This brought the independence of the central bank back into focus. Trump's renewed effort to remove Cook from her position as Fed chair over unproven allegations of mortgage fraud suggests two things. First, the administration is worried that the Fed may raise interest rates next month. Second, the president knows his appointee will not be able to stop this, even if it was in his best interests. Cook's public pressure could backfire, and she may be emboldened to join 'the hawks' if Trump does not remove her. There is also a possibility that the president will use her as a scapegoat in the event of policy tightening at the last two meetings before the midterm elections. He would counterpunch by saying that any rate increase was politically motivated to disobey him. The futures market sees a roughly 75% chance that a quarter point rate hike will occur by midterms. The main factors are the nearly six-year-long inflationary trend above target and the elevated core prices, along with the Iran-related energy price shock in the last six months. The outcome of the meeting on September 15-16 is viewed as a coin flip. Cook's Friday political jab was probably aware of this.

Trump's renewed attempt to remove Cook came in the form of a White House Letter saying that he was "considering". He also demanded a response from her within three weeks regarding what her lawyer has described as "baseless" allegations. This move came despite the June Supreme Court ruling which recognized the Fed's statutory protections but left open the question whether these allegations were grounds for removal. Cook has had a year to clear her name, even with the Supreme Court's pushback. Trump is now giving Cook three weeks to do so before the critical Fed meeting, where each vote counts on the increasingly divided committee. Tim Duy of SGH 'Macro Advisors, chief U.S. economics at the firm, wrote that "the issue of Fed autonomy has not yet resolved." This suggests Warsh may be unwilling or unable of supporting Trump's longstanding push to slash interest rates in response to elevated inflation. Warsh probably wishes that he was given more space to finish his reforms, and to make his policy case both internal and externally. This is especially true given the market's dissatisfaction with his vague inflation target and his preference for less communication. Keeping his distance could prove to be difficult. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had called Warsh, the Fed chairman since he took over the top job in May. Trump called Warsh brilliant late last month and blamed his board of directors for not lowering interest rates immediately.

The White House seems to have a renewed focus on the board.

Duy explained the implications for the markets and economy if Trump is successful. "If Trump wins, and only the accusation and ability to respond are necessary to replace Fed Governors, expect appointees that are willing to lower rates sharply like former Fed Gov. Stephen Miran," Duy stated. As of now, three members from this year's Federal Open Market Committee voted for a rate hike last month. Governors Chris Waller, and Cook voted against it, but both indicated that the Fed might have to tighten up to bring inflation above target back to its long-term 2% goal. If both of them voted for a rate hike next month, then the 9-3 split that was in favor of keeping rates would be 7-5. Jerome Powell, the former Fed chair and Trump's nemesis who is still on the board through his term ending in early 2028, could split the FOMC by voting for a rate hike.

A second big question is whether Warsh publicly back Cook as Powell did, in the absence proven guilt. How should the markets react? It is difficult to get a clear picture of the Fed's thinking ahead of this week’s consumer and producer prices inflation reports. These are the two major factors that influence Fed policy. Over the last 18 months, higher long-term Treasury rates and a weaker dollar has periodically appeared during intense bursts in the Fed independence saga. However, it is unclear whether investors view the issue as corrosive. It is best to look at the impact of Warsh's fuzzier inflation targets, combined with the renewed political pressure to fill the board with rate-cutting advocates. This combination could increase long-term inflation premiums on bond markets.

Barclays strategists said this week that if July was the beginning of the Fed losing confidence in its willingness to defend inflation targets, then the long term is under-pricing risk. They cited a notable change in the yields on long-dated bonds and inflation expectations following Warsh's latest press conference. The next two weeks are therefore of particular importance, according to us. The Fed's credibility and confidence in the market should be closely monitored to see how much damage was done, if any, to medium- and longterm inflation compensation.

Warsh, of course could stamp his independence at the next meeting by voting for the hawks. If this unlikely outcome does not occur, then doubts will be raised about the Fed's commitment to price stabilization and its independence from White House politics at a time when the bond market is vulnerable.

The opinions expressed are those of Mike Dolan a columnist at. This column is great! Check out Open Interest, your new essential source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.

(source: Reuters)