Latest News

The EU Flag Project Liquidity Concerns have selected some critical mineral companies

A document seen by revealed that some?key developers of critical minerals projects selected by the EU had called for urgent financing. It said?liquidity restrictions may put others in danger and?limit its ability to reduce its dependency on China.

After Beijing placed export controls on critical minerals for energy transition, electronic and defence, the?European?Union selected 47 projects in Europe last March and 13 others outside the bloc by June 2025.

In an "Urgent Action Call", 23 of 60 projects stated that "the goal must be to unlock urgently projects, especially those working towards a final investment decision who face acute liquidity and the market pressures and immediate danger."

The document didn't specify any specific companies.

In response to a question, the EU stated that they have been able to mobilize 1,7 billion euros ($1,97 billion) of financing for strategic project since December. They are also fully aware of the challenging market conditions.

When asked about the letter containing this document that was sent to European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, and Stephane Séjourne, industry commissioner, a?Commission spokeswoman said Europe?was?moving decisively towards strengthening its supply of essential raw materials.

The spokesperson added that it was done by "putting into place the framework for identifying strategic projects, accelerating permitting, and crucially mobilising the funding needed to make these projects a reality".

The financing issues of EU projects are meant to be part of the strategy of increasing its output of minerals, such as 'lithium, cobalt, and rare earths, required for development such?as AI Data Centres and Electric Vehicles (EVs). This contrasts sharply with U.S. deals worth nearly $40 billion.

The document sent to European Commission stated that "Fifteen month after the first Strategic Project Selection, projects are affected by unfulfilled promises on financing, access to markets and permits, as well as lack of vision, strategic and coherence among European approaches."

Viridian Lithium collapsed in March due to a lack of EU funding, according to Luc Pez. He added: "The choice of Viridian Lithium as an EU strategic program was a curse."

"Our private investors were waiting for Europe's commitment to the project but it never materialised." Pez stated that the numbers were small but crucial, referring to the lithium project. The project aimed at supplying 10% of EU's battery mineral needs.

PROGRESS MADE IN?BETTER ENGAGEMENT

The EU chose the projects to help it meet its targets in the Critical Raw Materials Act of 2024, which states that the bloc aims to mine 10% and process 40%, while recycling 25%, by 2030.

The EU spokesperson stated that "The Critical Raw Materials Act" is not a financing instrument, but it does propose several measures for project development.

The EU claimed?last summer that the projects would be aided with streamlined permits, financing, and assistance in selling their output. But the European Court of Auditors stated, "in February, efforts to diversify imports of essential minerals have yet to produce tangible results."

A director from one of the project's who attended the meeting said that at a meeting with Kerstin Joorna last month, the director general of GROW, the department of the Commission which includes the industry, "some progress was made in terms of better engagement, but no urgent financing solution was suggested."

The director declined to identify himself due to the sensitive nature of the issue. He said that it was not clear how many projects were experiencing liquidity problems.

The director stated that "Several projects had already been put on hold, so the promoters chose not to endorse the Call to Action to avoid attracting additional attention."

(source: Reuters)