Latest News

Top US spy agencies fight over turf and mission

People familiar with the situation say that the CIA has stopped contributing to certain intelligence assessments produced by the office nation's top spy, such as those regarding the Iran War. This is because disputes have erupted over intelligence sharing and areas of responsibility.

A?U.S. official and three people with direct knowledge of the matter said that the infighting between the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has been raging for over a year. This has disrupted collaboration on national intelligence analyses?onwhich presidents have long relied to navigate through complex foreign challenges. Officials and people who have direct knowledge of the issue.

Sources spoke under condition of anonymity in order to discuss?sensitive internal?matters.

Sources said that the core of the disagreements was a dispute over the task force created by Tulsi Gabrield, director of national intelligence in April 2025.

Two people said that the CIA, under Director John Ratcliffe's leadership, believes that Gabbard’s Director’s Initiatives Group acted recklessly in circumventing declassification and intelligence sharing protocols. ODNI officials claim that the CIA has consistently denied the group access to intelligence.

The collapse in intelligence agency collaboration comes at a dangerous time for the Trump Administration, as the U.S. is embroiled in a conflict with Iran and faces national security challenges from China's military expansion to Russia’s war in Ukraine.

This also indicates that the reforms implemented after September 11, 2001, which created the director of national Intelligence to coordinate the 18 U.S. spy agencies, did not end the dysfunction.

"ODNI should be the oil that keeps the arteries in the intelligence community flowing, and that removes any blockages," said Beth Sanner. She was a former assistant director of national Intelligence during the first term of President Donald Trump.

If you don't do that, you risk intelligence failures because agencies will retreat into their stovepipes.

The CIA can also reach the President and other policymakers through other channels, besides the?assessments prepared by ODNI. The intelligence is a major part of the Presidential Daily Brief - a highly classified compendium of daily intelligence reports for the President.

Gabbard announced last week she would step down from her position as Trump's chief?spy by June 30. She cited the illness of her husband. Trump announced on Tuesday that he had appointed Bill Pulte, the chief of the Federal Housing Finance Agency as acting director for national intelligence.

Olivia Coleman, a spokeswoman for the ODNI, stated that "the president and policymakers are receiving the best intelligence and analyses" from the intelligence services. She added that ODNI, and the agencies under its supervision, "communicate daily and collaborate with CIA counterparts on the full spectrum of intelligence operations and products."

Coleman stated that the Director's Initiatives Group operated within ODNI oversight authorities, and supported President's Executive Orders.

In February, it was reported that Gabbard has wound down her group and reassigned their personnel to other departments within her agency. This is due to congressional scrutiny of the group's activities.

Liz Lyons, CIA's Director of Public Relations, said that under Director Ratcliffe the CIA moved quickly to meet President Trump's priorities. The agency became more aggressive and took smart risks in order to outmaneuver its adversaries. This gave the United States a decisive edge.

Davis Ingle, a White House spokesperson, said that Trump's "peace-through-strength foreign policy" is a tried and true approach to keeping America safe and deterring global threats. Media efforts to sow division within the country would also fail.

Ingle stated that "President Trump is confident in the entire team of exceptional national security experts."

LESS COOPERATION IN INTELLIGENCE EVALUATIONS

The mutual distrust between the agencies is evident in the CIA's decision to drastically reduce its contribution to Gabbard’s office's assessments.

The National Intelligence Council, the leading U.S. intelligence analysis body, has relied heavily on the CIA to produce its reports. These reports are important, especially in times of war.

Two sources who have direct knowledge of the issue said that the agency is no longer involved in regular assessments of Iran, where the U.S. Military has been fighting against since February.

Sources said that the CIA and ODNI operate largely in two separate analytic operations.

Sources said that at one point in the past year, due to friction between two agencies, the CIA stopped publishing NIC reports through the distribution service for the internal intelligence communities it controls. This temporarily limited the availability of analytical products.

An official in the United States said that reports were withheld only for "a few" hours due to a "processing problem."

Four sources claim that the interagency friction began soon after Gabbard took up her post in February 2025.

Sources said that one of her first actions was to tighten up the production of the Presidential Daily Brief. Sources said that the CIA had long played a leading role in compiling this brief.

Sources say that the relationship soured even more with the creation of a Director's Initiatives Group to "root out", alleged politicization in the intelligence community.

The group also investigated the origins and security of COVID-19, as well the security of voting machines.

Some critics, including former intelligence officials claim that the group was created to exact revenge against Trump's perceived political enemies.

Two people familiar with the situation say that task force members pressed the CIA at various points to share the intelligence and materials required to complete ODNI assigned probes. However, they felt not enough was shared.

CIA OFFICERS OUTTERED

Gabbard removed two of the top CIA officials who headed the NIC in May 2025.

A government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the ODNI had removed the two because "they created a toxic workplace, as documented by a survey of the workforce, and they had a long history of politicizing the intelligence."

The official failed to provide any evidence that would support these claims.

Gabbard then stripped security clearances from 37 current and ex-officials in 'August', revealing in the meanwhile the identity of a CIA agent working undercover overseas.

Gabbard claimed that the 37 had politicized intelligence and leaked it, but did not provide proof.

Former officials and other people charged that this move was partly in response to a 2017 intelligence assessment which found that Russia used an extensive influence campaign to sway 2016 presidential votes to Trump.

Last month, tensions between the CIA and ODNI became public when a CIA agent assigned to the Director’s Initiatives Group told a Senate panel the agency had denied the group access to intelligence about the origins COVID-19.

Two people familiar with the investigation said that the dispute triggered an inquiry by the Inspector General's Office, an independent watchdog located at ODNI.

Could not determine the scope. (Reporting and editing by Don Durfee, Daniel Wallay and Errin Banco)

(source: Reuters)