Latest News

What the FEMA's shrinking funds mean for disasters to come

What the FEMA's shrinking funds mean for disasters to come

FEMA may face a deficit of up to $2 billion in the disaster relief fund

Storm season brings increased disasters

States and localities could shoulder costs

By David Sherfinski

"Basements were inundated." "I hate to say it, but that's what happens," she said.

She said, "FEMA was my first call." I have this memory that emergency funds were in my account in less than a week. I have a memory of what it should be like.

Gutzler struggles to even get a response for help with the damages caused by a tornado in March that swept the St. Louis region, including her community of Florissant. Other residents in the state also seek help after a second tornado swept the area in May.

She said that FEMA did not respond until several weeks after the incident. "I'd assume it was the administration and their capability."

She added that she had experience in customer service and knew what to do when people call you but you don't know the answer. You are taught to delay."

FEMA faces a competition for resources, on top of the federal government's staffing cuts. The Atlantic hurricane season is underway in the east U.S.

Experts are concerned that there will not be enough money and personnel available to deal with the next disaster.

"We know that this will be a very active Atlantic hurricane season," said Shana Udvardy. She is a senior climate resilience analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

She said that if we get one major hurricane, we will probably fall under the 'immediate need' category, which is used when disaster funds are running low.

DISASTER RELIEF FUNDS

In the aftermath of the Texas flooding this month, President Donald Trump declared a major catastrophe. This designation allows local governments and residents to request federal assistance.

According to the latest projections, FEMA's disaster relief fund will be depleted by $1.6-$2.3 billion by the end September. This is a result of the increasing number and costlier nature of disasters.

Russell Vought, the White House Budget Director, said that there was enough money to deal with the Texas catastrophe.

He told reporters in this month that FEMA had $13 billion on hand to cover the expenses. "The President has told Texas that it can get anything it wants."

If the fund is too low, then the government will switch to a funding category called 'immediate need', which puts non-emergency project on hold.

Udvardy stated that the funding is a source of stress for local and state governments who depend on it.

FEMA has not responded to any requests for comment.

States, local groups and non-profit organizations have been receiving a boost for projects that aim to reduce future disasters.

FEMA terminated BRIC in April, describing it as "wasteful and politicized" and announcing that it would transfer any funds not spent to the Disaster Relief Fund.

Some members of Congress are calling on Trump to restore these program grants, and asking if staff cuts at FEMA or other government agencies such as the National Weather Service have affected the response to Texas floods.

Bennie Thompson, Mississippi's top Democrat in the House Homeland Security Committee, said that the administration "cannot overlook the fact" that climate change is causing natural disasters to become more severe and frequent.

Thompson stated that "the president's threats to eliminate FEMA and fire scientists, as well as muzzle experts puts us in danger."

Kristi Noem, Department of Homeland Security secretary, said that FEMA was "disastrous", and "incompetent", at times in the past. This is especially true after Hurricane Katrina of 2005.

Noem said that the FEMA Review Council was set up by Trump in January.

Local Solutions

The administration can keep its relief fund full by issuing fewer major catastrophe declarations. However, this will shift the costs of cleanup to the states and localities.

Steve Ellis, the president of Taxpayers for Common Sense and a watchdog organization, said: "It appears they are less willing to provide disaster financing post-disaster or at least declare a major catastrophe."

In response to more intense and frequent climate-driven hurricanes, wildfires, and storms, nonprofit groups, localities and states have worked on their own solutions.

In Denver, Colorado residents voted for an increase in a tax and to establish a fund for climate protection seeded with approximately $40 million each year. Libby Zemaitis is senior manager for resilience at the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.

(source: Reuters)