Latest News

How can the next UK Prime Minister revive the economy? Channel Richard Nixon: Mike Peacock

The country has been unable to govern itself for the past decade. Andy Burnham may be Keir's likely successor. He has a plausible but narrow path to galvanize Britain's economy. To do this, he may need to channel the former U.S. president Richard Nixon. Burnham has a lot of time on his side. Burnham has three years before the next general election, which gives him time to implement fundamental changes. It's possible that the population is ready for change. Most Britons believe that the country has been heading in the wrong direction for a while, according to polls. Since the global financial crises, productivity growth has slowed. Since the global financial crisis, economic growth rates have dropped from 2.5% per year before the crisis to a little over 1%. Public debt, which was around 36% GDP in 2007, has now risen to almost 100%. Some may be willing accept difficult choices if they believe that it will lead to better times in the future. Burnham is a better communicator and may be able to weave a narrative that Starmer could not. Influence is the next factor. Starmer, despite having a large parliamentary majority in favour of his plans to reduce the over-bloated welfare system in the country, was unable to convince the vast majority of Labour MPs to back him.

Burnham has the chance to achieve this by channeling the "Nixon effect" in China. The former U.S. President's conservative, hawkish reputation allowed him to pursue rapprochement in the 1970s with Communist Beijing. A more left-leaning leader could not. Burnham might do the same thing in the other direction. Burnham has supported progressive economic policies for many years, calling it "business-friendly socialistism." This track record, combined with his popularity among his left-leaning party members, may help him convince them that he can be trusted to face the fiscal realities of the country.

How could Burnham pursue economic reforms? First, he must get the message right to both his party and to markets. Burnham, who was just re-elected to parliament in 2018, could claim that the global landscape has dramatically changed since Labour came to power in 2024. This means that he's not bound by Starmer’s commitments to not raise the personal tax rates, or to touch the generous state retirement arrangement known as "triple lock." Next step is to surround himself with the best people. It's a good sign that Jim O'Neill - former minister of the government and chief economist at Goldman Sachs - has advised him, along with Andy Haldane, former BoE Chief Economist. Burnham's selection of a finance minister is the key to his fiscal intentions.

He must also be prepared to take risks. O'Neill told BBC radio recently that "we need someone who is willing to do something bold, different and unique." Burnham, he said, should cut spending on welfare, healthcare, and state pensions to free up resources for productive investments without ballooning deficits. This move could win over bond investors and businesses, just as the early 1997 Labour decision to hand the Bank of England the control of interest rates had done. Burnham would have more room to invest with this trust without worrying the bond market. The fact that Canada is not an outlier in terms of debt should be helpful.

Burnham had a rough start in this regard, declaring early this year that "no government should be?hocked" by the bond market. Burnham has since changed his mind and agreed to keep the fiscal rules of current Finance Minister Rachel Reeves, which require that day-to-day expenditures be covered by income in three years, and net debt as a percent of GDP must drop within five years.

The UK's politicians are aware that they cannot play with the public's money, given the legacy of Liz Truss’ brief premiership, which was cut short in 2022 by the bond market's reaction to the?unfunded tax reductions.

GREAT COMMUNICATOR? Burnham is likely to face many of the challenges that his predecessor faced, but he may be luckier than?Starmer. If the Iran peace agreement?holds' and the Strait of Hormuz is reopened fully, the inflation rate could fall soon and the prospects of interest rates being cut next year may grow. This would help to reduce the country's debt.

The strength of the opposition is another issue. In successive by-elections there has been evidence that voters have voted tactically, backing the party they think will best defeat the right-wing Reform Party, and not necessarily their preferred candidate. This assumption may be correct. Burnham, who overwhelmingly defeated the Reform candidate at his by-election victory last week, could have more room to implement reforms.

As with Starmer's case, it will ultimately come down to personal conviction and personality.

Starmer came to power with no clear vision of the future for Britain, and little ability to articulate a path forward. When his party objected, he abandoned important policy plans.

Burnham is a great communicator, but this only counts if Burnham has a solid plan to sell. Burnham's former colleagues and even his allies say that he doesn't 'enjoy making unpopular decisions. His ability to make unpopular decisions will determine the fate of government and economy until 2029.

You like this column? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks. (Writing and Editing by Margueritachoy and Anna Szymanski.)

(source: Reuters)