Latest News

EU lawmakers authorize tougher bloc-wide charges for ecological crime

The European Parliament on Tuesday approved harder charges for ecological crimes such as unlawful timber trade, with offenses punishable by as much as 10 years in jail and company directors prosecuted for business wrongdoing.

It is about time we fought cross-border crimes at the EU level with harmonised and dissuasive sanctions to prevent brand-new ecological crimes. Under this agreement, polluters will pay, parliamentary rapporteur Antonius Manders stated.

Appropriate to the EU's 27 member states, the legislation targets offences such as illegal deficiency of water resources, severe breaches of EU chemicals law, pollution brought on by ships, and the destruction of ecosystems as a result of massive forest fires or prevalent contamination of air, water and soil.

Manders stated the new legislation - which updates a 2008 EU directive - people in leading positions at a business responsible for pollution can be prosecuted as well as business itself.

Environmental criminal offenses dedicated by people and business representatives will be punishable with jail time up to 8 years, depending on how lasting, serious or reversible the damage is. Offences that trigger the death of a person could draw a jail sentence of as much as ten years.

Transgressors will be needed to help restore a damaged environment and pay payment.

For companies, fines will rise to 5% of their yearly around the world turnover or additionally approximately 40 million euros ($ 43.41 million).

The brand-new instruction was adopted by 499 votes in favour, 100 versus and 23 abstentions and will take force after publication in the EU Official Journal. Member states will have 2 years to integrate the rules into their nationwide legal systems.

Marie Toussaint, a Greens member of the Strasbourg-based parliament, said in a declaration the EU was embracing among the world's most enthusiastic pieces of legislation to fight environmental crime, but it did not go far enough.

It is a pity the Council succeeded in presenting a fixed amount for companies, instead of a proportional quantity based on turnover. This will cause unreasonable scenarios that take no account of a business's monetary scenario.

(source: Reuters)