Latest News

EPA tightens up regulation on US waterways

EPA tightens up regulation on US waterways

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced on Wednesday that it would narrow the definitions of waters that could be federally regulated in order to comply with 2023 Supreme Court ruling. Republican legislators from agricultural states applauded this move.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin stated that the agency would work to create a simple definition "that will stand the test of time".

He said that the previous administration's definition of "waters of the United States" placed unfair burdens on American citizens and increased the cost of doing businesses.

This announcement is part of what Zeldin called a "ping-pong" of policy changes around the regulation and protection of "waters in the United States", which are protected by the 1972 Clean Water Act against pollutants such as fertilizers, pesticides and mining waste.

The EPA tried to expand its regulatory authority over wetlands and streams under the Obama and Biden Administrations. However, this was met with opposition from the industry, agriculture and Republican legislators who called it a sweeping move.

The Sackett vs. EPA 2023 case established a standard that limits the ability of the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers to regulate certain types of wetlands which do not connect to navigable waterways and streams.

Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, the chairwoman of the Senate Environment Committee, said: "By delivering a framework which is both clear, and legally sound and refining key terms, as well as rescinding previous vague and inconsistent guidelines, we bring predictability to all those who depend on clear, workable, water regulations."

Environmental groups have warned against a narrowing of the definition of waterways that are regulated. This would negatively impact on wetland conservation.

(source: Reuters)