Latest News

Analysis shows that the US munition was most likely responsible for the deadly strike on an Iranian wedding.

Analysis shows that the US munition was most likely responsible for the deadly strike on an Iranian wedding.
Analysis shows that the US munition was most likely responsible for the deadly strike on an Iranian wedding.

Weapons experts reviewed video and images verified by the Iranian authorities and concluded that it was likely a direct strike by an American munition, not a ricochet from another target.

The incident in Kuhestak, a small town in Iran, has reignited concern about the civilian cost of the U.S.-Iran war. It is the most dramatic case to date since a missile hit an Iranian primary school and killed scores of students and teachers in February.

U.S. Central Command announced that its forces had carried out multiple strikes in Iran's southern region on Sept. 1. These targeted air defense systems, radars, and communication?facilities of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The barrage was in response to earlier Iranian attacks against U.S. assets around the Gulf.

JD Vance, the U.S. president, said on Thursday that the United States is investigating this strike. "We are investigating it because we obviously care." Vance stated during a White House Press Briefing that "We want to know".

The U.S. Military said that it is aware of the reports and is looking into them.

The Iranian delegation at the United Nations has not responded to a comment request immediately.

According to eyewitnesses, on the night of the attack, dozens had gathered at a Kuhestak home for a wedding. According to expert-verified photos and videos, an explosive likely hit the roof of the building during the party.

Four military weapons experts were shown the video and images. They said that the damage was consistent for a direct strike, rather than secondary damage caused by a munition ricocheting from another target. Three experts believed the weapon was most likely an American weapon and not an Iranian air defense missile that erred.

Experts said that the weapon could have just missed its target.

Gareth Collett is a retired British Army Brigadier with a PhD in explosives engineering and a specialization in counter-terrorist bomb disposal.

Images show that wedding decorations, which are popular in this?part of Iran, were scattered around the rubble after the strike.

A witness sent a message to a friend a few moments after the attack, saying "Kuhestak has been destroyed." Four, five, ten houses were destroyed. There are many people under the rubble. "God help us"

Residents of the area spoke anonymously.

Under the condition of anonymity two U.S. officials said the U.S. Military had conducted strikes in the area of Kuhestak, specifically targeting the town’s telecommunications mast on September 1.

Satellite imagery shows that the tower is approximately 135 meters away from the location of the wedding. According to Iranian media, the tower was struck at around 9:30 pm local time.

One U.S. official said that the government is examining various scenarios in relation to the deaths at the wedding. This includes whether the deaths were caused by an American strike, a ricochet from an Iranian air defence missile or even an interceptor going rogue.

Balochestan Human Rights Documentation Network (BHDN) and Haalvsh who monitor and document abuses of human rights, reported four deaths and 68 injured.

According to the groups, three of the victims were guests at the wedding - Kolsoom Molahi Najhandania (43), Zarkhatoon Theri (50), and Amir Mohammad Karimi (4 years old) - According to the?groups, three of those killed were guests at the?wedding - Kolsoom Mollahi Najhandania, 43; Zarkhatoon Taheri, 50; and four-year-old Amir Mohammad Karimi.

Iranian media has also confirmed the names.

This incident occurred more than six month after a missile destroyed an elementary school in Minab, on 28th February. Hours later the U.S.-Israeli attacks against Iran that triggered the current conflict began. According to Iranian officials, the missile hit caused the deaths of more than 175 students and teachers.

The Pentagon hasn't publicly released its findings on the Minab attack, the U.S. Military's largest civilian casualty event in decades. First reported on March 5, that a preliminary, internal U.S. Military investigation indicated that U.S. Forces were likely responsible for the strike that occurred on the first day of war with Iran.

On Sept. 1 at around 9:30 pm local time, social media began to spread posts about a possible attack on a local wedding.

Human rights groups that were in contact with local residents reported that local authorities had pressured eyewitnesses to not discuss the attack on foreign media after the strike.

Intermediaries were used to contact residents.

"There were many people at the wedding." "Many people have been removed, and many more [injured persons] are being taken now," a local resident stated in a message shortly after the wedding.

Citing telecommunications authorities in Hormozgan in Iran's state media, the Iranian media said that the tower is a civilian structure which provides mobile, telephone and internet services for people in Sirik County.

During the six month war in Iran, U.S. forces repeatedly attacked Iranian radar and communication facilities near the Strait of Hormuz. The aim was to stop the Iranian military from attacking commercial ships and oil tanks transiting this waterway.

Iran has demonstrated that it is able to throttle energy shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, which drives up global energy prices and creates a challenge for the Trump Administration ahead of the U.S. midterm Congressional election.

Trevor Ball, an ex-U.S. Army explosive ordnance removal technician, and current weapons analyst at Armament Research Services were among the experts that reviewed the photos and videos on request.

He said that the damage appeared to be caused by a munition that detonated when it came into contact with the roof or just above. It was a direct strike.

The visible blast damage cannot be caused by fragments of the nearby attack on the communications tower that struck the area.

He said that it was probably a U.S.-made weapon.

Collett agreed that Ball's analysis was correct.

He said that the weight of evidence points towards an air-dropped 500 lb munition from the United States, rather than a missile for Iranian air defence.

Sebastian Schutte is a Research Professor at the Peace Research Institute, Oslo. He also reviewed the visual materials. He also agreed, based on the evidence available, that the hole in the roof wasn't the result of the ricochet from the telecommunications mast.

Three experts agreed that it was unlikely a missile fired by Iran accidentally destroyed the house.

Schutte stated that the angle of impact was not consistent with an air defence missile.?Collett also said there was no sign of the type of fragmentation which would be normal with an air-defense warhead.

On Iranian media, various weapons fragments have also been shown. Ball identified "some" of these fragments as belonging to the?joint-standoff weapon (JSOW), which is a type glide bomb used by U.S. forces.

Could not confirm that the fragments were from the attack on a house in Kuhestak.

Residents of Kuhestak held the funerals for those who were killed on Thursday. The procession was filled with mourners carrying caskets and posters while a funeral service played in the background.

Women in black full-body cloaks and bright red facemasks, which are distinctive of the southern coast region of Iran threw small flowers onto Amir Mohammad Karimi’s casket when it passed.

One eyewitness said, "The situation is sad and mournful in Sirik and the people are still shocked."

(source: Reuters)