Latest News
-
Serbia promises aid to Ukraine, but ducks calls for more pressure on Russia
Aleksandar Vucic, the president of Ukraine, said that Serbia would send Ukraine more humanitarian assistance but had not signed a regional agreement calling for more pressure to be put on Russia and for continued security aid for Ukraine. Vucic had earlier met President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and taken part in the regional Southeastern Europe - Ukraine summit. It was the first time in more than a decade that a Serbian president visited the Ukrainian capital. Vucic had also participated in the regional Southeastern Europe-Ukraine summit last year. Belgrade has had a long history of close relations with Moscow. It has refused to join the Western sanctions against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. However, it has condemned Moscow's policy at the United Nations, and has expressed support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity. Vucic also met Zelenskiy several times. VUCIC FACES ANTI GOVERNMENT PROTESTS Following the summit, the longtime Serbian president, who is considering an early election as he navigates through more than a years worth of anti-government demonstrations, promised more financial, energy, and medical aid to Ukraine. He also pledged to help rebuild a town that was not named. Vucic told Serbian journalists that "we have not made any good progress so far, but we will try our best to get the best possible results for the Ukrainian people in this town." Vucic refused to sign a joint declaration of the summit, which called for a continuation of the political, military and financial support to Ukraine, as well as a strengthening of pressure on Russia. Vucic said he refused to sign the summit's joint declaration, which calls for the continuation of political, military, financial, and security support to Ukraine and strengthening pressure on Russia. Vucic stated that Serbia would continue to support Ukraine's EU application. "Ukraine and Moldova,?and all other... can count on Serbia's assistance," he said. He was referring to a former Soviet republic that is now governed by an EU-friendly government. Belgrade recognizes Ukraine as a whole, including the territories that Russia has seized since 2014. Kyiv, on the other hand, refuses to recognise Kosovo's 2008 independence, which is primarily a?Albanian province of Serbia. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in?2022, Serbia, a country with a population of around 6.5 million, has donated 60 million Euros in non-lethal, non-military assistance to Ukraine. Moscow has repeatedly accused Belgrade of selling ammunition via intermediaries to Ukraine. Belgrade has denied ever supplying ammunition to Ukraine, but said that it had sold to other purchasers worldwide. Vucic’s visit comes also after a conference of EU candidate countries held in Serbian capital,?Belgrade, last week. Ruslan Stefanchuk, the Ukrainian parliament's speaker, accused Moscow during the event of aggression, and "humiliating", Serbs. Maria Zakharova - the Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson - criticised Belgrade on Saturday for failing to respond "to the hostile antiRussian remarks" made Stefanchuk.
-
US sanctions are aimed at disrupting Iran's weapons procurement
The US?government announced sanctions against individuals and entities that it claimed were a part of a network that helped Iran acquire weapons. In a statement, the U.S. Treasury Department stated that sanctions would be imposed on Iranians and Russians as well as entities with bases in Iran, Russia,?and Nigeria. The move coincides with heightened tensions, including hostilities between Washington and Tehran over the Strait of Hormuz. Treasury released a statement saying that Wednesday's targets "exemplify Iran’s use of foreign aviation, transport, and financial conduits as well as travel coordinators in order to conceal the IRGC’s role 'in illicit procurement' and to move materials and personnel around the world." These sanctions are in addition to the U.S. actions taken?in May?against companies and individuals, including some based in China and Hong Kong?against accusations that they were aiding Iran's weapons sector. The U.S. imposed sanction in June against 11 individuals and entities who helped weapons?procurement for Iran's IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) and Iranian military.
-
Gold prices drop after US PPI data and focus on Middle East tensions
Gold prices recovered on Wednesday after the U.S. Producer prices fell unexpectedly in June. However, concerns about inflation and high interest rates remain due to the escalating Middle East tensions. By 11:35 am EDT (1535 GMT), spot gold had fallen nearly 1% in the previous session. U.S. gold futures dropped?0.4% at $4,053.70. Phillip Streible is the chief market strategist for Blue Line Futures. He said that gold has recovered from its earlier losses this morning, as PPI was lower than expected. This also eased concerns over multiple interest rate increases by the Fed this year. Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Labor Department reported that the Producer Price Index for Final Demand fell 0.3% in June after an upwardly revised 0.6% rise in May. The economists polled had predicted?an unchanged PPI following a previously reported advance of 1.1% in May. CME FedWatch Tool data shows that traders see a 10,2% chance for a rate hike at the Federal Reserve meeting in July, as opposed to 16,6% before the data. Data on Tuesday also showed that U.S. consumer prices slowed down more than anticipated in June. The U.S. announced that it had 'begun a new round of strikes against Iran, after reimposing a naval blocade on Iranian ports. Meanwhile, Iran has threatened to cut off regional energy exports. Oil continued to rise on Wednesday. Recent developments in the Strait of?Hormuz region have simply re-ignited fears about unchecked price pressures. If tensions continue to escalate, leading to higher oil prices, gold could be exposed. This is according Lukman Otunuga senior research analyst of FXTM. A solid break below this point could open the door to $3,950 or $3,000. If $4,000 is a reliable support, the price may rise to $4,100. Fuel costs are likely to continue rising, which could lead central banks to keep rates high for longer. This would reduce the appeal of gold as an asset that does not yield any income. Spot silver fell 1.6% to $57.67 while platinum rose 0.2% to $1.634.13. Palladium dropped 0.8% to 1,294.25. Reporting by Ashitha Shilpa Prasad in Bengaluru and Sukanya Mittra; editing by Shilpa Majumdar and Jonathan Ananda
-
Ghana adopts revised mining laws to strengthen oversight
The Ghanaian cabinet has approved amendments for the mining law to be submitted to parliament. Mines Minister Emmanuel Armah Kofi Buah announced this on Wednesday as part of efforts by government to increase oversight and curb illegal mines. Ghana, Africa's largest gold producer, is implementing reforms to boost state revenue and increase local participation in the mineral wealth. It introduced a sliding scale gold royalty regime this year linked to prices, and announced plans to phase out fiscal stabilization agreements. This could impact major miners such as Newmont, Gold Fields, AngloGold Ashanti, Zijin, and Perseus. Buah said at a press conference in Accra that Ghana's Minerals and Mining Act 2006, which has been in force for almost two decades, needs to be updated and modernized. This policy aims to indigenize the mining industry by strengthening the local content of minerals through domestic value-adding, improving links to the manufacturing industry and dealing decisively with the threat?of illicit mining and protecting our environment. The proposed law creates district mining committees that give host communities an early role in the licensing process. The prospecting and reconnaissance licences are to be replaced by a single exploration licence, which will have a maximum of five years. Extensions can only be granted after a review is made of the initial two-year programme. Buah added that if you don't invest in exploration for five years, you will lose your license. He added that mining?lease agreements would still be limited to a maximum of?20-years, but now companies would have to sign community development agreements directly negotiated with the host communities rather than being decided by the company. Maxwell Akalaare Adombila, Louise Heavens and Emmanuel Bruce contributed to the report.
-
Nuclear fuel company Standard Nuclear reduces US IPO size more than by half
Standard Nuclear has reduced the size of its proposed U.S. Initial Public Offering by more than 50 percent on Wednesday. It joins a'string' of companies who have lowered their valuation targets to match cautious investor sentiment this year. The company plans to sell 10,000,000 shares for $15 each. It originally intended to sell 18.25 million of its shares between $18-$21 each. Standard Nuclear's valuation would be $2.4 billion at $15, as opposed to its previous target of $3.55billion. Analysts claim that despite the strong resurgence of the U.S. IPO Market this year, investors remain cautious about valuations and prefer to ignore less exciting offerings. Ambulance giant GMR, and small modular reactor developer Deep Fission?have also downsized their initial public offerings?in the past few months. The poor performance of recent IPOs including SpaceX is negatively affecting demand for U.S. IPOs. This is especially true for high-risk and loss-making deals like Standard Nuclear, according to IPOX CEO Josef Schuster. The Oak Ridge, Tennessee, based company processes enriched uranium into advanced nuclear fuels for advanced nuclear reactors including small modular reactors or microreactors. It reported a $7.7-million net loss?and revenues of $593.802 for the three months ending March 31. This compares to a $8.3-million?net loss and revenues of $377.926 from a year ago. The company's revenues are primarily generated by?fuel development contracts and research and developments projects. Schuster stated that "sector-specific weaknesses" are contributing to a more challenging pricing environment. He referred to the subdued trading in NuScale?Power and Oklo which both fell more than 35% during this year. Standard?Nuclear will price its IPO on Wednesday, and debut on the NYSE Thursday. Reporting by Arasu Kanagi Basil in Bengaluru and Pragyan Kalita; editing by Shilpa Majumdar
-
Codelco believes that the lithium project at Chile's Maricunga Salt Flat is feasible within eight years
Codelco's chairman Bernardo Fontaine stated on Wednesday that the lithium project at?the Maricunga flat salt will become a reality in eight years. The state-owned copper company Codelco, along with its partner Rio Tinto, manages the Maricunga Lithium project. Fontaine stated that the agreement had not been signed because certain conditions were still to be met. Some of these conditions have already been met, while others are pending on an international level. The executive said that the joint venture agreement "awaits regulatory approval" from Chile and China, after receiving?antitrust approvals with no conditions from Brazil and South Korea, and Poland. The Chilean mining ministry has revised the special operating contract in response to observations made by the national auditor. Fontaine said that lithium is not a critical mineral and there are no supply issues. * Codelco’s new board is reviewing the state miner's plans, projects and prioritizing investment and evaluating possible asset sales. The company's?title of?world’s largest copper producer? will be lost in 2025.
-
Buffett calls Bill Gates Epstein ties "disgusting" and says that his children are prepared to share his fortune.
Warren Buffett called Bill Gates' association with the late sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein, "disgusting," but said that he would halt his donations to the Gates Foundation as his children grew older and were now ready to receive his wealth. Buffett told CNBC in an excerpt of a Wednesday interview that he tells his children to do it well. The comments were broadcast a day after 95-year-old Berkshire Hathaway Chairman omitted the Gates Foundation in his annual midyear charitable donations. He donated almost $6 billion worth of stock from his conglomerate. Buffett donated Berkshire shares worth more than $47 billion to the Gates Foundation between 2006 and 2008. The latest donation of 12 million Class B Shares will instead go to four foundations headed by his children Susie Howard and Peter. Buffett has donated over $23 billion in Berkshire Stock to the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation as well as the Howard G. Buffett Foundation, NoVo Foundation and Sherwood Foundation since 2006. BUFFETT SAYS GATES MADE 'MISTAKES Buffett revealed that Gates, who was a close friend and a director of Berkshire for 16 years, had visited him three weeks ago in Omaha. This meeting was held after the U.S. Department of Justice released in February files relating to Gates' relationship and philanthropic efforts with Epstein. Gates met with Congress about Epstein last month. He has expressed his regrets for Epstein and has never been charged with any crimes. Buffett stated that he had made mistakes when he hired people or chose friends and later found out they were not what he thought. Buffett said that donating to Bill Gates'?Gates Foundation was a "good choice" and he had no regrets about his relationship with him. Buffett stated, "We've had a?number? of?good?times? together." It has been an amazing friendship. Epstein, who was arrested on charges of sex-trafficking in August 2019, died in a Manhattan prison cell. The medical examiner in New York City ruled the death as a suicide. Keep your marbles Buffett also accelerated his timetable for distributing the remaining Berkshire stock, which represents an approximate 13% stake in this $1.06 trillion conglomerate. Buffett wants his shares to be distributed 10 years after his death, not by the end of 2034. He noted the advancing age of his children. Susie Buffett will be 81 years old by 2034. Buffett told CNBC that he had reevaluated his entire situation. It's not only a matter of mortality. It's about keeping your marbles. Reporting by Jonathan Stempel, New York. Editing by Emelia S. Sithole-Matarise & Andrea Ricci
-
Gold gains following US PPI data and focus on Middle East tensions
The gold price reversed its earlier declines on Wednesday, after U.S. producer prices unexpectedly dropped in June. However, escalating Middle East tensions?limited gains as they kept inflation and interest rate concerns alive. By 1258 GMT, the spot price of?gold? rose 0.3% to $4067.60 an ounce at 858 AM EDT. U.S. gold futures rose 0.2% to $4 075.80. Phillip Streible is the chief market strategist for Blue Line Futures. He said that gold has recovered from its earlier losses as PPI was lower than expected. This eases some concerns regarding multiple interest rate hikes by the Fed this year. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Labor Department, last month's Producer Price Index fell 0.3% after a downwardly-revised 0.6% rise in May. The PPI was expected to remain unchanged by economists polled, after a 1.1% increase in May. CME FedWatch Tool data shows that traders expect a 9.1% chance of an increase in interest rates at the Federal Reserve meeting on July, as opposed to 16.6% before data. Data on Tuesday also showed that U.S. consumer prices slowed down more than was expected in June. The U.S. announced that it had begun a second wave of attacks against Iran, after reimposing a naval blocade?of Iranian ports. Iran, meanwhile, threatened to cut off even more regional energy exports. Oil continued to rise on Wednesday. Recent developments in the 'Strait of Hormuz' have simply re-ignited fears about unchecked price pressures. If tensions escalate further and oil prices rise, gold could be exposed to downside risks, said Lukman tunuga senior research analyst of?FXTM. A solid break below this level may open the doors to $3,950 or $3,000. If $4,000 is a reliable support level, the price may rise back to $4,100." Fuel costs may continue to drive inflation, prompting central banks to keep rates at high levels for longer. This could also affect gold's appeal as an asset that doesn't yield. Platinum gained 0.4%, bringing the price to 1,638.24. Spot silver fell 0.1%. Palladium dropped 0.1% to $1.303.50. Reporting by Ashitha Shivprasad in Bengaluru and Sukanya Mittra; editing by Shilpa Majumdar
The US Supreme Court supports federal regulators FCC and SEC in their victories
In a pair?of rulings reaffirming the power of federal agencies, the U.S. Supreme Court has reaffirmed limitations it had previously imposed on government regulatory agencies but rejected attempts by?challengers? to push these constraints into new territories.
The court, with a conservative majority of 6-3, handed down decisions in two cases on Thursday that were in favor of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Securities and Exchange Commission. The court ruled against the challenges made to the FCC system of levying fines, and to?the?SEC?s broad powers to recover illegal profits through a financial remedy known as disgorgement.
The court has challenged the "administrative state", the government bureaucracy which regulates so many aspects of American life and business, in several recent major cases. However, the justices of Thursday backed the two agencies.
Georgetown University Law Professor David Super described these rulings as a "small, mostly technical win" for the FCC.
Super stated that "these cases should be understood to mean the court is telling Congress and the administrative agencies, if the adhere to the strict limits on public regulations in its previous decisions, it will not return and move the goalposts." In both cases, the administration of President Donald Trump defended agencies.
AT&T AND VERIZON LOSE In the FCC's case, the court ruled in favor of the agency 8-1, rejecting a challenge from wireless?carriers AT&T or Verizon. This was the latest case to examine whether an internal enforcement system at a federal agency violates the right to a trial by jury. The Supreme Court curbed in-house proceedings in the SEC case in 2024.
The Justices rejected on Thursday the argument of AT&T, Verizon and that the Jarkesy decision should dictate an outcome similar to the FCC case.
The court stressed that the financial penalties imposed by the agency - also known as forfeiture orders - do not prevent parties from challenging the fines imposed by the agency.
The court did not expand its previous decision in Jarkesy but it stressed that companies are under no obligation to comply with FCC forfeiture orders, until a jury rules on the case. University of Michigan Law School Professor Daniel Deacon stated.
Deacon stated that he wasn't surprised by the result or the fact that Trump's government had defended the agency’s power.
Deacon stated that the Trump administration is aware of its ability to use the administrative state in its own interests, but it hasn't always opposed agency claims of authority.
DISGORGEMENT AUTHORITIES The 9-0 decision of the court, which supported a broad interpretation of the SEC’s disgorgement power, strengthened one of its key powers.
The dispute was about whether the agency had to prove that victims had suffered economic damage, also called pecuniary losses, before it could seek to surrender illegal profits.
Ongkaruck?Sripetch, a defendant in the case of Liu v. SEC, asked the court for clarification on a prior ruling. He was challenging a court order that had been issued by the SEC requiring him to pay back more than $3,000,000 in ill-gotten gain and interest relating to a financial crime case. In a case called Liu V. SEC, the 2020 ruling limited the amount of disgorgement that could be requested to the net profit of the conduct in question.
The court stated on Thursday that the Liu decision didn't bolster Sripetch in his case against the SEC.
Jose Lopez, a former SEC attorney and an attorney with the law firm Dorsey & Whitney, said that the court's decision "preserved the SEC's strongest weapon in its enforcement arsenal."
In several important rulings, the court reined federal agencies in.
The court has, in recent years, formalized the doctrine of major questions, a conservative legal principle that allows judges to invalidate actions taken by executive agencies that are "of vast economic and political importance" unless they can be deemed clearly authorized by Congress.
The court, in 2024, overturned another precedent from 1984 that gave deference to U.S. government agencies when interpreting the laws they administer. The "Chevron doctrine" had long been opposed by conservatives and business interests.
Brianne Gorod is the chief counsel of the Constitutional Accountability Center. A liberal legal group that backed the SEC and FCC, she called the rulings on Thursday a victory for regulators, and "everyone" who benefits when these agencies are able to perform their duties.
Gorod stated that "while this court has had a long history of favoring the interests of big business and making it harder for federal agencies to perform their duties, today's rulings are a reminder it is not always possible to anticipate what this court will decide."
(source: Reuters)