Latest News

French court orders TotalEnergies to address climate risks associated with its products

French court orders TotalEnergies to address climate risks associated with its products
French court orders TotalEnergies to address climate risks associated with its products

A Paris court on Thursday ruled that French oil giant TotalEnergies had to disclose climate risks associated with emissions from its oil products and present plans to mitigate them.

The decision is a partial win for climate change NGOs who are trying to apply France's duty of vigilance corporate law from 2017 to climate change. The?court did not order any specific measures, such as limiting exploration and production overseas or setting binding emission?reduction targets.

In recent years, climate litigation against oil giants has had mixed results. The Netherlands Supreme Court is currently reviewing a landmark Dutch ruling that ordered Shell to reduce emissions.

Plan Updated

"Climate risk?to which companies can contribute through their activity is within the scope of duty?of surveillance... "Climate risks to which companies can contribute by their activity are within the scope of the duty?of vigilance...

TotalEnergies is required to submit an updated vigilance program for court review within?six month.

The company didn't immediately respond to a question about whether it will appeal. It said earlier on Thursday that it didn't 'believe the law should be applied to climate risks, and argued that it shouldn’t be held responsible for so-called Scope 3 emission -- those generated by customers using its fuel products.

A coalition of Association SHERPA and Notre Affaire a Tous along with France Nature Environnement - and the City of Paris - filed the case 2020. They argued that TotalEnergies’?oil & gas business is in conflict with climate goals, and it breaches the duty to identify and prevent environmental harm.

SHERPA didn't immediately respond to a comment request.

In?2023, the?suit was declared inadmissible. However, this decision was reversed on appeal. As an interested party, French prosecutors argued that the duty of vigilance was not meant to cover climate changes. (Reporting by America Hernandez in Paris. (Editing by Inti and Mark Potter.

(source: Reuters)